Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Braz J Med Biol Res ; 51(12): e7558, 2018 Oct 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30365724

RESUMEN

The association between pet ownership and the development of allergic and respiratory diseases has been the aim of several studies, however, the effects of exposure in adults remain uncertain. The aims of the present study were to investigate the prevalence of asthma and lung function status among dog and cat owners. This cross-sectional study was performed at two universities with students and workers who were allocated into 3 groups according to pet ownership in the previous year: cat owners, dog owners, and no pets (control group). Subjects underwent spirometry, bronchial challenge test with mannitol, skin prick tests, and questionnaires about animal exposures and respiratory symptoms. Control group comprised 125 subjects; cat owner group, 51 subjects; and dog owner group, 140 subjects. Cat owners had increased asthma prevalence (defined by symptoms and positive bronchial challenge test), but no changes in lung function compared to the control group. The dog owner group had lower spirometry values (forced expiratory volume in one second and lower forced vital capacity), but similar asthma prevalence, compared to the control group. In the cat owner group, excess of asthma may have an immunological basis, since we found an association with atopy. Although we did not have endotoxin data from volunteers' households, we postulated that low values of lung function were associated to exposure to endotoxins present in environments exposed to dogs.


Asunto(s)
Asma/epidemiología , Asma/etiología , Gatos , Perros , Pulmón/fisiopatología , Propiedad/estadística & datos numéricos , Mascotas , Adolescente , Adulto , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Análisis de Varianza , Animales , Asma/fisiopatología , Brasil/epidemiología , Niño , Estudios Transversales , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Femenino , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado/fisiología , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalencia , Valores de Referencia , Hipersensibilidad Respiratoria/epidemiología , Hipersensibilidad Respiratoria/etiología , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Pruebas Cutáneas , Espirometría , Capacidad Vital/fisiología , Adulto Joven
2.
Braz. j. med. biol. res ; 51(12): e7558, 2018. tab
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-974253

RESUMEN

The association between pet ownership and the development of allergic and respiratory diseases has been the aim of several studies, however, the effects of exposure in adults remain uncertain. The aims of the present study were to investigate the prevalence of asthma and lung function status among dog and cat owners. This cross-sectional study was performed at two universities with students and workers who were allocated into 3 groups according to pet ownership in the previous year: cat owners, dog owners, and no pets (control group). Subjects underwent spirometry, bronchial challenge test with mannitol, skin prick tests, and questionnaires about animal exposures and respiratory symptoms. Control group comprised 125 subjects; cat owner group, 51 subjects; and dog owner group, 140 subjects. Cat owners had increased asthma prevalence (defined by symptoms and positive bronchial challenge test), but no changes in lung function compared to the control group. The dog owner group had lower spirometry values (forced expiratory volume in one second and lower forced vital capacity), but similar asthma prevalence, compared to the control group. In the cat owner group, excess of asthma may have an immunological basis, since we found an association with atopy. Although we did not have endotoxin data from volunteers' households, we postulated that low values of lung function were associated to exposure to endotoxins present in environments exposed to dogs.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Animales , Masculino , Femenino , Niño , Adolescente , Adulto , Gatos , Perros , Adulto Joven , Propiedad/estadística & datos numéricos , Asma/etiología , Asma/epidemiología , Mascotas , Pulmón/fisiopatología , Valores de Referencia , Hipersensibilidad Respiratoria/epidemiología , Asma/fisiopatología , Espirometría , Brasil/epidemiología , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado/fisiología , Prevalencia , Estudios Transversales , Factores de Riesgo , Análisis de Varianza , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos
3.
Clin Exp Allergy ; 47(11): 1436-1444, 2017 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28787776

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Workers exposed to laboratory animals have a high risk of developing laboratory animal allergy (LAA). Atopy seems to be the main risk factor for LAA. We hypothesized that occupational sensitization is a better predictor for the development of asthma, rhinitis, and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) than common sensitization. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between occupational sensitization to laboratory animals and clinical outcomes. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study performed at two universities on students and employees dealing with small rodents. The subjects were allocated in groups: non-sensitized, common sensitization, or occupational sensitization, according to the results of the skin prick test (SPT). All subjects answered a questionnaire about animal exposures, symptoms, allergic diseases, and underwent spirometry and bronchial challenge test with mannitol. Multivariate analysis was performed using Poisson regression to estimate the prevalence ratio (PR). RESULTS: Data from 453 volunteers were analysed. Non-sensitized group comprised 237 subjects; common sensitization group, 142 subjects; and occupational sensitization group, 74 subjects. Occupational sensitization was associated with greater risk for all outcomes studied. When the common sensitization group was reference, skin symptoms had PR of 1.36, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-1.85; wheezing had PR of 1.75, CI 95%: 1.21-2.53; rhinitis had PR of 1.25, 95%: 1.11-1.40; nocturnal dyspnoea had PR of 2.40, 95% CI: 1.31-4.40; bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) had PR of 2.47, 95% CI: 1.50-4.09; and confirmed asthma had PR of 2.65, 95% CI: 1.45-4.85. In addition, the overlap of asthma, rhinitis, and skin symptoms in a same subject was significantly more prevalent in the occupational sensitization group, 16.2% versus 4.9% in the common sensitization group. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Occupational sensitization is associated with allergic symptoms and respiratory diseases. SPT with occupational allergens along with other parameters may contribute to detection of risk for allergic and respiratory diseases associated with exposure to laboratory animals.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/inmunología , Animales de Laboratorio , Asma/inmunología , Exposición Profesional , Rinitis Alérgica/inmunología , Piel/inmunología , Piel/patología , Adulto , Animales , Animales de Laboratorio/inmunología , Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunización , Masculino , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Prevalencia , Rinitis Alérgica/diagnóstico , Rinitis Alérgica/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Pruebas Cutáneas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA