Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Br J Cancer ; 109(8): 2035-43, 2013 Oct 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24084766

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Natural history models of breast cancer progression provide an opportunity to evaluate and identify optimal screening scenarios. This paper describes a detailed Markov model characterising breast cancer tumour progression. METHODS: Breast cancer is modelled by a 13-state continuous-time Markov model. The model differentiates between indolent and aggressive ductal carcinomas in situ tumours, and aggressive tumours of different sizes. We compared such aggressive cancers, that is, which are non-indolent, to those which are non-growing and regressing. Model input parameters and structure were informed by the 1978-1984 Ostergotland county breast screening randomised controlled trial. Overlaid on the natural history model is the effect of screening on diagnosis. Parameters were estimated using Bayesian methods. Markov chain Monte Carlo integration was used to sample the resulting posterior distribution. RESULTS: The breast cancer incidence rate in the Ostergotland population was 21 (95% CI: 17-25) per 10 000 woman-years. Accounting for length-biased sampling, an estimated 91% (95% CI: 85-97%) of breast cancers were aggressive. Larger tumours, 21-50 mm, had an average sojourn of 6 years (95% CI: 3-16 years), whereas aggressive ductal carcinomas in situ took around half a month (95% CI: 0-1 month) to progress to the invasive ≤10 mm state. CONCLUSION: These tumour progression rate estimates may facilitate future work analysing cost-effectiveness and quality-adjusted life years for various screening strategies.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Modelos Biológicos , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Carcinoma in Situ/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma in Situ/epidemiología , Carcinoma in Situ/patología , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/epidemiología , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/patología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Mamografía , Cadenas de Markov , Persona de Mediana Edad , Método de Montecarlo , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Suecia/epidemiología
2.
Hum Exp Toxicol ; 32(5): 449-63, 2013 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23079669

RESUMEN

Lead (Pb) is a developmental neurotoxicant found in industrial activities, many of them already prohibited worldwide. This study aimed to evaluate current blood Pb (PbB) levels in children in Cordoba, Argentina, and to compare these with similar studies performed before Pb was banned in gasoline in 1996. We also sought to identify mechanistically relevant biomarkers by measuring δ-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase (δ-ALAD), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and catalase (CAT) activities. We finally aimed to determine whether sociodemographic characteristics are associated with Pb toxicity. Blood samples collected from 161 healthy children between September 2009 and February 2010 revealed mean PbB levels of 2.58 ± 0.30 µg/dl. Enzymatic δ-ALAD, CAT, and SOD activities showed no significant variations when plotted against PbB levels. Finally, children living in the suburbs have higher PbB levels than their city counterparts, while low socioeconomic status increased δ-ALAD inhibition compared with that of middle-income children. Overall, these results evidenced a substantial reduction in exposure to Pb in this pediatric population over a decade after Pb was restricted in gasoline and reveal the importance of pursuing novel biomarkers of toxicity along with the sociodemographic profile to complement Pb diagnosis.


Asunto(s)
Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Gasolina/efectos adversos , Plomo/sangre , Adolescente , Argentina , Biomarcadores/sangre , Catalasa/metabolismo , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Gasolina/análisis , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Porfobilinógeno Sintasa/metabolismo , Clase Social , Superóxido Dismutasa/metabolismo
3.
Intern Med J ; 39(7): 453-8, 2009 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19220546

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patterns-of-care studies emphasize significant variation in the management of lung cancer. The aim of the study was to compare the patterns of care for patients diagnosed with lung cancer in 1996 and 2002 within three health areas in New South Wales. METHODS: Treatment data were collected from medical records and treating doctors for the calendar year 1996 and between 1 November 2001 and 31 December 2002. Patients were residents of either south-western Sydney, Hunter or Northern Sydney health areas at the time of diagnosis. chi(2)-tests were used to investigate changes in treatment patterns between the two time periods. An adjusted odds ratio for treatment in 2002 relative to 1996 was calculated using logistic regression. RESULTS: Data were available for 738 and 567 cases in 1996 and 2002, respectively. Cancer-specific therapy was given within 6 months of diagnosis to 62 and 64% of patients, respectively. Adjusting for health area, age, sex, pathology and performance status, the odds ratio (OR) of treatment in 2002 relative to 1996 was 1.03 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78-1.35). When stage was included, the odds of treatment in 2002 relative to 1996 for non-small-cell lung cancer (n = 950) was 1.21 (95%CI 0.87-1.68). After adjustment for potential confounders, patients diagnosed with small-cell lung cancer (n = 176) were substantially less likely to receive treatment in 2002 compared with patients diagnosed in 1996 (OR = 0.11; 95%CI 0.04-0.34). CONCLUSION: The odds of receiving treatment in 2002 and 1996 were similar. However, patients diagnosed with small-cell lung cancer in 2002 were significantly less likely to receive treatment. Overall, this study suggests there has been no change in lung cancer care in New South Wales. Further work is required to determine what proportion of persons with lung cancer should receive cancer-specific treatment so that clinical practices can be judged appropriately.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Atención al Paciente/tendencias , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nueva Gales del Sur/epidemiología , Atención al Paciente/normas , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/tendencias , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/epidemiología , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Intern Med J ; 36(4): 244-50, 2006 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16640742

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This article is part of a project to determine the cost-effectiveness of averting the burden of disease. We used population data to investigate the costs and benefits of allocating resources to optimal treatment for asthma in adults, using a burden of disease framework. METHODS: We calculated the population burden of asthma in the absence of any treatment as years lived with disability (YLD), ignoring the years of life lost. We then estimated the proportion of burden averted with current interventions, the proportion that could be averted with optimally implemented current evidence-based guidelines and the direct treatment cost-effectiveness ratio in dollarA per YLD averted for both current and optimal treatment. RESULTS: The direct treatment cost of current treatment of adult asthma in Australia was dollar A452 million and averted 25% of the burden with a cost-effectiveness ratio of dollar A14 000/YLD averted. Optimal treatment and optimal compliance would cost dollar A627 million and avert 69% of the burden with a cost-effectiveness ratio of dollar A7000/YLD averted. CONCLUSION: Implementation of optimal treatment for asthma is affordable, will be more cost-effective and will significantly decrease disability.


Asunto(s)
Antiasmáticos/economía , Asma/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Antiasmáticos/uso terapéutico , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Australia , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Método de Montecarlo , Análisis Multivariante , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA