RESUMEN
Autoimmune glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) astrocytopathy was described for the first time in 2016. The most common clinical manifestation is meningoencephalomyelitis associated with a characteristic imaging pattern that allows diagnostic suspicion and its confirmation through determination of antibodies in serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). We present a case of a 35-year-old patient with involvement of the central and peripheral nervous system and a recent diagnosis of thyroid cancer, which compared to the compatible clinical picture of meningoencephalomyelitis, characteristic findings on MRI and after the exclusion of alternative pathologies, we finally arrived at the diagnosis by the positive determination of anti-GFAP in CSF. The patient underwent surgical treatment and radioactive iodine for the diagnosed thyroid tumor and she subsequently received treatment with corticosteroids with partial improvement of the neurological symptomatology. We emphasize that in this pathology the MRI images usually depict a characteristic pattern, although not pathognomonic, it is necessary to consider other causes. Before a high suspicion of this entity due to the clinical and imaging picture, it is convenient to measure the antibody in CSF, given the greater sensitivity and specificity compared to its serum screening, in order to arrive to the definitive etiological diagnosis as it was done in the clinical case that is presented.
La astrocitopatía autoinmune asociada a proteína ácida fibrilar glial (GFAP) fue descripta por primera vez en el año 2016. La manifestación clínica más frecuente es la meningoencefalomielitis asociado a un patrón imagenológico característico que permite la sospecha diagnóstica y su confirmación mediante la determinación de los anticuerpos en suero y en líquido cefalorraquídeo (LCR). Presentamos el caso de una paciente de 35 años con compromiso del sistema nervioso a nivel central y periférico y un reciente diagnóstico de cáncer de tiroides, que frente al cuadro clínico compatible de meningoencefalomielitis, los hallazgos característicos en resonancia magnética y luego de la exclusión de enfermedades alternativas, finalmente se arribó al diagnóstico por la determinación positiva de anti GFAP en LCR. Realizó tratamiento quirúrgico y con iodo radioactivo por su tumor hallado y posteriormente recibió tratamiento con corticoides con mejoría parcial de la signo-sintomatología neurológica. Destacamos que en esta enfermedad las imágenes por resonancia magnética presentan un patrón característico, aunque no patognomónico, siendo necesario considerar otras causas. Ante una alta sospecha de esta entidad por el cuadro clínico e imagenológico, es conveniente realizar dosaje del anticuerpo en LCR, dada la mayor sensibilidad y especificidad en comparación con su pesquisa en suero, con el fin de arribar al diagnóstico etiológico definitivo como en el caso clínico presentado.
Asunto(s)
Proteína Ácida Fibrilar de la Glía , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Astrocitos/patología , Autoanticuerpos/sangre , Autoanticuerpos/líquido cefalorraquídeo , Enfermedades Autoinmunes del Sistema Nervioso/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Autoinmunes del Sistema Nervioso/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Autoinmunes del Sistema Nervioso/inmunología , Proteína Ácida Fibrilar de la Glía/líquido cefalorraquídeo , Proteína Ácida Fibrilar de la Glía/sangre , Proteína Ácida Fibrilar de la Glía/inmunologíaRESUMEN
ABSTRACT: In the context of the global vaccination campaign against COVID-19, several cases of postvaccinal Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) were reported. Whether a causal relationship exists between these events has yet to be established. We investigated the clinical and electromyographic characteristics of patients who developed GBS after COVID-19 vaccination and compare these with findings in patients with GBS, without a history of recent vaccination. We included 91 cases between March 2020 and March 2022, treated at 10 referral hospitals of Buenos Aires, Argentina. Of these, 46 had received vaccination against COVID-19 within the previous month. Although Medical Research Council sum-scores were similar in both groups (median 52 vs. 50; P = 0.4), cranial nerve involvement was significantly more frequent in the postvaccination group (59% vs. 38%; P = 0.02), as was bilateral facial paralysis (57% vs. 24%; P = 0.002). No differences were found in clinical or neurophysiological phenotypes, although 17 subjects presented the variant of bilateral facial palsy with paresthesias (11 vs. 6; P = 0.1); nor were significant differences observed in length of hospital stay or mortality rates. Future vaccine safety monitoring and epidemiology studies are essential to demonstrate any potential causal relationship between these events.