RESUMEN
AIMS: This study aimed to assess the performance of an automated multiplex polymerase chain reaction (mPCR) technique for rapid diagnosis of native joint septic arthritis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with suspected septic arthritis undergoing aseptic diagnostic joint aspiration were included. The aspirate was used for analysis by mPCR and conventional microbiological analysis. A joint was classed as septic according to modified Newman criteria. Based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) values of the mPCR and the synovial fluid culture were compared using the z-test. A total of 72 out of 76 consecutive patients (33 women, 39 men; mean age 64 years (22 to 92)) with suspected septic arthritis were included in this study. RESULTS: Of 72 patients, 42 (58%) were deemed to have septic joints. The sensitivity of mPCR and synovial fluid culture was 38% and 29%, respectively. No significant differences were found between the AUCs of both techniques (p = 0.138). A strong concordance of 89% (Cohen's kappa: 0.65) was shown. The mPCR failed to detect Staphylococcus aureus (n = 1) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 1; no primer included in the mPCR), whereas the synovial fluid culture missed six microorganisms (positive mPCR: S. aureus (n = 2), Cutibacterium acnes (n = 3), coagulase-negative staphylococci (n = 2)). CONCLUSION: The automated mPCR showed at least a similar performance to the synovial fluid culture (the current benchmark) in diagnosing septic arthritis, having the great advantage of a shorter turnaround time (within five hours). Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:288-296.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Infecciosa/diagnóstico , Artritis Infecciosa/microbiología , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa Multiplex , Líquido Sinovial/microbiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paracentesis , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
AIMS: The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains demanding due to limitations of all the available diagnostic tests. The synovial fluid marker, α-defensin, is a promising adjunct for the assessment of potential PJI. The purpose of this study was to investigate the qualitative assessment of α-defensin, using Synovasure to detect or exclude periprosthetic infection in total joint arthroplasty. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 50 patients (28 women, 22 men, mean age 65 years; 20 to 89) with a clinical indication for revision arthroplasty who met the inclusion criteria of this prospective diagnostic study. The presence of α-defensin was determined using the qualitative Synovasure test and compared with standard diagnostic methods for PJI. Based on modified Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria, 13 cases were categorised as septic and 36 as aseptic revisions. One test was inconclusive. RESULTS: The Synovasure test achieved a sensitivity of 69% and a specificity of 94%. The positive and negative likelihood ratios were 12.46 and 0.33, respectively. A good diagnostic accuracy for PJI, with an area under the curve of 0.82, was demonstrated. Adjusted p-values using the method of Hochberg showed that Synovasure is as good at diagnosing PJI as histology (p = 0.0042) and bacteriology with one positive culture (p = 0.0327). CONCLUSION: With its ease of use and rapid results after approximately ten minutes, Synovasure may be a useful adjunct in the diagnosis of PJI. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:66-72.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , alfa-Defensinas/metabolismo , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Proteína C-Reactiva/metabolismo , Femenino , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/diagnóstico , Prótesis de Cadera/efectos adversos , Humanos , Prótesis de la Rodilla/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor Postoperatorio/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Falla de Prótesis/efectos adversos , Reoperación , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Líquido Sinovial/química , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Clinical joint activity is a strong predictor of joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but progression of damage might increase despite clinical inactivity of the respective joint (silent progression). The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of silent joint progression, but particularly on the patient level and to investigate the duration of clinical inactivity as a marker for non-progression on the joint level. METHODS: 279 patients with RA with any radiographic progression over an observational period of 3-5â years were included. We obtained radiographic and clinical data of 22 hand/finger joints over a period of at least 3â years. Prevalence of silent progression and associations of clinical joint activity and radiographic progression were evaluated. RESULTS: 120 (43.0%) of the patients showed radiographic progression in at least one of their joints without any signs of clinical activity in that respective joint. In only 7 (5.8%) patients, such silent joint progression would go undetected, as the remainder had other joints with clinical activity, either with (n=84; 70.0%) or without (n=29; 24.2%) accompanying radiographic progression. Also, the risk of silent progression decreases with duration of clinical activity. CONCLUSIONS: Silent progression of a joint without accompanying apparent clinical activity in any other joint of a patient was very rare, and would therefore be most likely detected by the assessment of the patient. Thus, full clinical remission is an excellent marker of structural stability in patients with RA, and the maintenance of this state reduces the risk of progression even further.