RESUMEN
Five antibodies, 2D.1 (pan-leukocyte), AE-1,3 (anti-keratin), B72.3 (anti-carcinoma), ME 1-14 (alpha-chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan) and polyclonal S-100 protein (P-S100), were tested to determine if this panel could be used immunocytochemically to differentiate melanoma from nonmelanoma. A total of 161 cases were evaluated: 145 fine needle aspirates of various body sites and 16 effusions, consisting of 52 melanomas, 41 adenocarcinomas, 11 squamous cell carcinomas, 14 undifferentiated carcinomas, 8 small cell carcinomas, 8 miscellaneous carcinomas, 8 primary central nervous system (CNS) tumors, 7 lymphomas/leukemias, 4 sarcomas and 8 benign effusions. The 52 melanomas were stained by ME 1-14 (in 31 cases) and by P-S100 (in 39 cases), but not by B72.3, AE-1,3 or 2D.1. The 82 carcinomas reacted with P-S100 (in 25 cases), B72.3 (in 37 cases), AE-1,3 (in 68 cases) and 2D.1 (in 1 case), but not with ME 1-14. Lymphomas were stained only by 2D.1 (5 of 7 cases). The eight primary CNS tumors reacted solely with ME1-14 (in 3 cases) and P-S100 (in 3 cases). The eight benign effusions exhibited staining by ME 1-14 (in 1 case), P-S100 (in 1 case), AE-1,3 (in 3 cases) and 2D.1 (in 8 cases), but not by B72.3. Thirty-six cases (including 11 melanomas) failed to stain with any antibody. In summary, 41 of 52 melanomas and 4 of 8 CNS tumors stained with ME1-14, P-S100 or both and were negative for B72.3, AE-1,3 and 2D.1. Only 2 of 101 other nonmelanomas exhibited this pattern. Thus, this panel distinguishes melanoma from other neoplastic and nonneoplastic processes in the majority of cases.
Asunto(s)
Melanoma/diagnóstico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Antígenos de Neoplasias/análisis , Carcinoma/diagnóstico , Carcinoma/inmunología , Humanos , Pruebas Inmunológicas , Queratinas/inmunología , Linfocitos/inmunología , Proteínas S100/inmunologíaRESUMEN
Approximately 70% of breast cancers contain cell populations with hyperdiploid (greater than G0/G1) DNA content; however, cells cultured from breast cancers have only diploid DNA contents and karyotypes. Mechanically dissociated cells rarely, if ever, grow in culture, while enzymatically dissociated cells do grow in most cases. To determine if cell dissociation techniques used to prepare cells for culture and other laboratory procedures select for cells with specific features, and if tumor cells are killed in the process, breast cancer cells obtained by mechanical dissociation and by enzymatic dissociation were examined for DNA content and cell viability (measured by dye exclusion). Mechanical dissociation yielded more dead cells and cells with hyperdiploid (greater than G0/G1) DNA than did enzymatic dissociation. Hyperdiploid cells were also found in the dye-excluding population with each dissociation technique, suggesting that the hyperdiploid cells were not always dead. We conclude that, in vivo, tumors contain cellular subpopulations with low viability and hyperdiploid (greater than G0/G1) DNA patterns. The extent to which these subpopulations are present in a sample depends on the dissociation technique employed. That only diploid cells are found in cultures of primary breast cancers may be because enzymatic dissociation, used to prepare cells for culture, yields predominantly diploid cells. These observations also have important implications for interpreting measurements made on dispersed cells, e.g., viability, DNA content, and other cytochemical markers.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/ultraestructura , Ploidias , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Separación Celular/métodos , Supervivencia Celular , Femenino , Citometría de Flujo , HumanosRESUMEN
Estrogen receptor (ER) analysis by sucrose density gradient analysis (SDGA) was compared with histochemical localization of estrogen binding using 6-carbomethoxy-bovine serum albumin-fluorescein isothiocyanode-estradiol (E2-6-CMO-BSA-FITC) (6FE), 17-thiosemicarbozene-BSA-FITC-estrogen (E-17-TSC-BSA-FITC) (17FE), and polyestradiol phosphate-antiestradiol antibody-FITC (PEP) on serial frozen sections of metastatic breast cancer lesions from 72 patients treated with hormonal therapy. A comparison of assays to clinical responses gave the following sensitivities: ER-SDGA, 90%; 6FE, 50%; 17FE, 55%; and PEP, 58%. Specificities were as follows: ER-SDGA, 81%; 6FE, 47%; 17FE, 41%; and PEP, 59%. The SDGA gave the highest predictive value for clinical response, while the predictive value for each of the three histologic techniques approximated that predicted by chance alone. These selected histochemical techniques for ER localization, despite impressive cytologic localization patterns, therefore, do not correlate with clinical response.