RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Standard-of-care first-line treatment for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) is pembrolizumab plus platinum and fluorouracil (FU). However, FU is associated with potential challenges (continuous 4-day infusion, high administration costs, and cardiovascular and gastrointestinal toxicities), creating a clinical need for alternative chemotherapy combinations. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of first-line pembrolizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel for R/M HNSCC in the open-label, single-arm, phase IV KEYNOTE-B10 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04489888). METHODS: Eligible adults had previously untreated, histologically or cytologically confirmed R/M HNSCC regardless of PD-L1 status, measurable disease per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR), and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously once every 3 weeks for ≤35 cycles and carboplatin AUC 5 mg/mL/min intravenously once every 3 weeks for ≤6 cycles and investigator's choice of paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 or 175 mg/m2 on day 1, intravenously once every 3 weeks. The primary end point was objective response rate per RECIST v1.1 by BICR. RESULTS: Between October 27, 2020, and April 29, 2022, 149 patients were screened and 101 received treatment. As of February 20, 2023, the median follow-up was 18.9 months (range, 9.1-27.0). At this final analysis, 49 (49%) of 101 patients had an objective response (95% CI, 38.4 to 58.7), including seven patients (7%) with a confirmed complete response. Of the 101 treated patients, grade 3-5 and serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in 76 (75%) and 27 (27%), respectively. There were no new safety signals. CONCLUSION: Pembrolizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel showed promising antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile in first-line R/M HNSCC, suggesting this combination may be an alternative option for this patient population.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Despite emerging novel therapies, treating acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains challenging. Complexities persist in designing pivotal clinical trials and establishing acceptable endpoints for AML. Recent FDA guidance for drug and biological products development for AML outlines considerations for trial design. The guidance defines overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) as endpoints representing clinical benefit for AML therapies without curative intent. We highlight the EFS definition, particularly the assignment of day 1 as the event date for patients with induction treatment failures (ITFs), as recommended in the guidance. Through a comprehensive simulation study, our results show that the guidance EFS definition performs adequately with high complete remission (CR) rates but may pose challenges for low CR rates. When the experimental arm CR rate is 5% or less over the control, the use of the ITF events at day 1 for EFS definition leads to a critical power decrease, hampering the ability to predict survival benefit for a moderate OS duration. We further expand upon the EFS definition with the event date at ITF period end. Our goal is to inform investigators and regulatory agencies about the implications and limitations of various EFS definitions for future pivotal trials in AML.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Tamsulosin is the most widely used alpha-1 blocker medication for managing benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) as indicated in the current practice guideline. The aim of this study was to compare all-cause medical costs and BPH-specific medical costs in older male adults with BPH treated with tamsulosin vs other alpha-1 blockers (i.e., doxazosin, terazosin, and alfuzosin). METHODS: This was a retrospective propensity-score matched cohort study based on 2006-2012 Medicare claims data. All-cause medical costs and BPH-specific medical costs were compared between tamsulosin and other alpha-1 blockers treatment groups using baseline-adjusted quantile regression analyses. The comparisons were performed at different percentiles of the cost distributions. RESULTS: 176,793 older male adults with BPH who used alpha-1 blockers were included in the analysis. All-cause medical costs in 75th and 95th percentiles of the cost distribution are substantially higher in tamsulosin treatment group when compared to other alpha-1 blocker medications (p < 0.05 for all). Tamsulosin treatment group had substantially higher BPH-specific medical costs in 99th percentile of the cost distribution when compared to doxazosin and terazosin (p < 0.001 for all). Overall, the top 5% of the patients with the highest all-cause medical costs accounted for approximately 45% of the overall all-cause medical costs, and the top 1% of the patients with the highest BPH-specific medical costs accounted for 39-51% of those costs. CONCLUSION: Older adults with BPH who encountered higher medical expenses had substantially higher medical costs when treated with tamsulosin than other common alpha blockers. Cost-related quality of measures should be assessed to improve health outcomes in older adults with BPH.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To develop a simple approach for evaluating the overall benefit-risk of a new noninferiority treatment compared with a standard of care. METHODS: We propose using multicriteria decision analysis that accounts for uncertainty associated with both clinical outcomes and patient preference data. Because patients' preferences are likely to be influenced by their baseline characteristics, we suggest carrying out a preference study at the beginning of a trial. To reduce the burden of an additional study questionnaire, preference elicitation could be done on a small sample of trial participants. To restore preferences for all trial participants, we propose using multiple imputation (MI). Using simulations, we examine whether 3 different MI procedures lead to the same benefit-risk assessment conclusion, as if all trial participant preferences were obtained. We also compare MI results to complete case analysis, where only preferences of the small sample of trial participants are considered. RESULTS: We show that the MI procedure successfully restores patients' preferences for the trial participants using different outcome criteria and preferences. For example, using 3 outcome criteria with only 10% of the trial participants providing their preferences, complete case analysis demonstrated a new noninferior treatment as favorable only 5.1% of the time, whereas MI procedures did so between 16.2% and 17.9% of the time. Given that 17.6% correspond to the fully observed weights, the MI methods demonstrate favorable results. CONCLUSIONS: The MI procedure can help facilitate a simple comprehensive benefit-risk assessment for new noninferior treatments.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Incomplete data analysis continues to be a major issue for non-inferiority clinical trials. Due to the steadily increasing use of non-inferiority study design, we believe this topic deserves an immediate attention. METHODS: We evaluated the performance of various strategies, including complete case analysis and various imputations techniques for handling incomplete non-inferiority clinical trials when outcome of interest is difference between binomial proportions. Non-inferiority of a new treatment was determined using a fixed margin approach with 95-95% confidence interval method. The methods used to construct the confidence intervals were compared as well and included: Wald, Farrington-Manning and Newcombe methods. RESULTS: We found that worst-case and best-case scenario imputation methods should not be used for analysis of incomplete data in non-inferiority trial design, since such methods seriously inflate type-I error rates and produce biased estimates. In addition, we report conditions under which complete case analysis is an acceptable strategy for missing at random missingness mechanism. Importantly, we show how two-stage multiple imputation could be successfully applied for incomplete data that follow missing not at random patterns, and thus result in controlled type-I error rates and unbiased estimates. CONCLUSION: This thorough simulation study provides a road map for the analysis of incomplete data in non-inferiority clinical trials for different types of missingness. We believe that the results reported in this paper could serve practitioners who encounter missing data problems in their non-inferiority clinical trials.

RESUMEN

Proper analysis and reporting of incomplete data continues to be a challenging task for practitioners from various research areas. Recently Nguyen, Strazdins, Nicholson and Cooklin (NSNC; 2018) evaluated the impact of complete case analysis and multiple imputation in studies of parental employment and health. Their work joins interdisciplinary efforts to educate and motivate scientists across the research community to use principled statistical methods when analyzing incomplete data. Although we fully support and encourage work in parallel to NSNC's, we also think that further actions should be taken by the research community to improve current practices. In this commentary, we discuss some aspects and misconceptions related to analysis of incomplete data, in particular multiple imputation. In our view, the missing data problem is part of a larger problem of research reproducibility and replicability today. Thus, we believe that improving analysis and reporting of incomplete data will make reproducibility and replicability efforts easier. We also provide a brief checklist of recommendations which could be used by members of the scientific community, including practitioners, journal editors, and reviewers to set higher publication standards.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Conventional MRI techniques do not necessarily provide information about multiple sclerosis (MS) disease pathology or progression. Nonconventional MRI techniques, including proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1 H-MRS), are increasingly used to improve the qualitative and quantitative specificity of MR images. This study explores potential correlations between MRI measures of disease and disability progression as measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Functional Systems (FS), and ambulation index scores in a unique cohort of MS patients treated with glatiramer acetate that has been closely monitored for over 20 years. METHODS: This was a multicenter, open-label, cross-sectional MRI substudy among participants in the GA-9004 open-label extension of the 36-month, double-blind GA-9001 study, timed to coincide with the prospectively planned 20-year clinical exam. RESULTS: Of 64 patients who participated in the MRI substudy, results are presented for the 39 patients (61%) who had a 1 H-MRS assessment at 20 years of treatment. Both total N-acetylaspartate relative to total creatinine (tNAA/tCr) concentration ratio and T1 lesion volume were found to be robustly associated with disability levels with different statistical approaches. Gray matter (GM) volume was found to be a more consistent parameter than white matter (WM) volume for disability allocation. The elastic net algorithm showed a trade-off between WM and GM volumes for disability estimation when different disability definitions were used. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with MS receiving long-term glatiramer acetate therapy, consistent effects on disability levels indicated by EDSS and pyramidal FS score thresholds were found for tNAA/tCr concentration ratio and T1 lesion volume.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Attenuation of Disease progression with Azilect GIven Once-daily (ADAGIO) delayed-start study demonstrated a benefit of early-start treatment with rasagiline 1 mg/day versus delayed-start treatment in PD. This follow-up study aimed to assess whether these benefits persist and the clinical progression rate during long-term naturalistic treatment. METHODS: The ADAGIO Follow-Up study was initiated approximately 26 months after completion of the ADAGIO study. Patients were followed for 3 years and were treated in an open-label manner with rasagiline 1 mg/day and any other PD treatment that was deemed appropriate. Changes from follow-up baseline to study end in UPDRS scores, and the emergence of clinical milestones (including unsteady gait and/or balance impairment, falls, freezing of gait, and cognitive decline) were assessed. RESULTS: The study enrolled 683 patients (58% of the full ADAGIO cohort and 72% of ADAGIO completers). At baseline, mean time from diagnosis was 46.9 months and UPDRS total score was 25.6 units. There were no significant differences in UPDRS total or subscale scores or time to any milestone between patients who were in the original ADAGIO early-start group versus those in the delayed-start group. At study end, patients (total cohort) had worsened by a mean ± standard deviation of 6.0 ± 11.6 UPDRS total units, 3.3 ± 8.6 UPDRS motor units and 2.0 ± 4.0 UPDRS activities of daily living (ADL) units. Overall, 43.6% of patients had onset of unsteady gait/balance impairment, 35.7% had fallen, 26.2% had freezing of gait, and 33.1% had cognitive decline. CONCLUSIONS: The ADAGIO Follow-Up study failed to demonstrate long-term benefits of early-start rasagiline treatment in the prior ADAGIO study. Clinically important milestones occurred in a substantial proportion of patients. © 2016 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of glatiramer acetate (GA) 20 mg/mL once-daily subcutaneous injections (GA20) in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) is well-established. However, injection-related adverse events (IRAEs) may impede treatment adherence and tolerability. GA 40 mg/mL three-times weekly (GA40) also has a favorable efficacy and safety profile. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and patient experience when converting from GA20 to GA40. METHODS/TRIAL DESIGN: GLACIER was an open-label, randomized, parallel-group trial conducted at 31 sites in the US between June 2013 and December 2013. Stable RRMS patients on GA20 were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to continue with GA20 or convert to GA40. The adjusted mean annualized rate of IRAEs was the primary endpoint for this study. Additionally, the severity of IRAEs, rate of injection-site reactions (ISRs), and patient-reported MS impact and treatment satisfaction were compared for the two treatment groups over the 4-month core study. RESULTS: A total of 209 patients were randomized to convert to GA40 (n=108) or continue with GA20 (n=101). The adjusted mean annualized rate of IRAEs was reduced by 50% with GA40 (35.3 events per year; n=108) versus GA20 (70.4 events per year; n=101) (risk ratio (RR)=0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.34-0.74; p=0.0006). There was a 60% reduction in the rate of moderate/severe events (GA40 (n=108): 0.9 events per year versus GA20 (n=101): 2.2 events per year; RR=0.40; p=0.0021). Perception of treatment convenience improved for GA40-treated patients soon after converting and was sustained. CONCLUSIONS: The GLACIER study demonstrates a favorable IRAE and convenience profile of GA40 for RRMS patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01874145 available at clinicaltrial.gov.

Asunto(s)