RESUMEN
Mastication is a notable source of interindividual variation in texture perception and could be linked to oral tactile sensitivity. To better understand the influence of oral tactile sensitivity on mastication behavior, this study measured masticatory behavior and texture discrimination in participants of high (n = 20) and low (n = 21) oral tactile sensitivity. Overall, there was no significant difference between high and low sensitivity participants in their ability to distinguish texture changes (p = .486). However, there were significant differences found between the groups based on their masticatory behaviors including chewing pattern and overall number of chewing cycles. Additionally, those in the high sensitivity group used more stochastic chewing movements, while those in the low sensitivity group were found to use crescent-shaped chewing cycles. It was also noted that in the high sensitivity group, the jaw moved further distances in all phases and moved at a higher velocity when opening but not when closing, when compared to the low sensitivity group. These results show what particular aspects of mastication are most influenced by oral tactile feedback. Chewing patterns have been shown to influence texture and flavor perception, as well as energy intake. However, much of the person-to-person variability in chewing patters comes from unknown sources. This study shows which chewing behaviors are different between a group of individuals with high oral tactile sensitivity and another with low oral tactile sensitivity. These findings highlight the manner in which tactile feedback from the mouth influences chewing.
Asunto(s)
Conducta Alimentaria/fisiología , Masticación/fisiología , Gusto/fisiología , Percepción del Tacto/fisiología , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Dureza , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Movimiento , Tacto , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
While it is widely accepted that texture is a multimodal in nature, little research has been published regarding how we use senses other than touch to assess texture. In beverages, humans use texture (i.e. viscosity) information to estimate calories and expected satiety. This study was designed to compare and contrast the sensitivity of humans to changes in viscosity and their ability to estimate satiety through different sensory modalities. Milk samples of varying viscosities were constructed, and 49 participants were asked to perform a series of 2-alternative forced choice tests and identify which sample was thicker. Sensitivity to viscosity changes across different sensory modalities was determined by having each participant consume the samples, listen to the samples pouring, and observe clear vials of the samples. Using vision, participants were notably less sensitive to changes in viscosity when compared to hearing or oral tactile sensations. Interestingly, oral tactile sensations and hearing were almost identical in their viscosity difference thresholds (0.346â¯cP and 0.360â¯cP, respectively). Similar patterns were observed when the participants were asked to estimate how full they expected to be after consuming beverage stimuli varying in viscosity. Expected caloric values and satiation were found to change with thickness level when participants were assessing the stimuli through the auditory or tactile modalities. However, these measures of expected caloric value and satiation did not change as a function of viscosity for visual assessment, suggesting the assessment of caloric density and satiation are linked to specific sensory modalities' ability to detect viscosity. This study highlights the relative importance of vision, auditory, and touch to forming our sensory judgements regarding viscosity and subsequent satiety estimations.
Asunto(s)
Bebidas , Saciedad , Tacto , Viscosidad , Adulto , Percepción Auditiva , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Nutritivo , Percepción del Tacto , Percepción Visual , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Texture perception is one of the most important factors in food acceptance, yet population-wide differences in texture sensations are not well understood. The variation in texture perception across populations is thought to depend on oral tactile sensitivity and masticatory performance. To address this hypothesis, we aimed to measure tactile acuity with a battery of tests and quantitate the relationship to masticatory performance. The study was performed on 98 participants, in three age groups (20-25, 35-45, or over 62). Two main measures of oral sensitivity were performed: to assess bite force, subjects were asked to discriminate between foam samples of varying hardness. Second, to assess lingual sensitivity the subjects were asked to identify 3D printed shapes using their tongue, as well as identify confectionary letters. Additionally, masticatory performance was measured through assessing each participants ability to mix two-colored chewing gum. In general, we found that sensitivity and masticatory performance in the younger age groups was superior to that of older adults. We also found a positive linear trend between bite force sensitivity and masticatory performance with younger participants, a trend not found in older participants. We found no significant relationship between age groups for bite force sensitivity and masticatory performance, suggesting that age-related declines in bite force sensitivity are not a significant cause of altered masticatory performance. This study represents a valuable first step in showing that bite force sensitivity does not depend on age, and the minimal influence of factors such as oral sensitivity on masticatory performance. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: In a society that is rapidly aging, it is important to understand the subtle changes in physiology and eating behavior that are associated with aging. This study used a variety of tests oral sensitivity to better understand which aspects of oral physiology are integral for effective chewing. The information gained helps shed light on to the factors that create an effective chewing cycle. Besides moving knowledge forward, this study may help in designing food and rehabilitation programs for those with trouble chewing and swallowing, increasing their overall quality of life.