RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Early treatment of psychotic illness improves outcomes, reduces relapse rates and should not be delayed. Cariprazine is a promising antipsychotic drug and may be a valuable resource when clinicians are in doubt if psychotic symptoms are due to schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis that included seven studies (n = 2896) analyzing the effect of cariprazine in psychotic symptoms assessed by the positive and negative symptoms scale (PANSS). RESULTS: We found cariprazine to be significantly superior to placebo (Hedges' g = 0.40; 95% CI 0.32-0.49) for acute psychosis independently of primary psychiatric diagnosis and also to be superior to placebo for both schizophrenia (Hedges' g = 0.39; 95% CI 0.29-0.50) and bipolar patients (Hedges' g = 0.43; 95% CI 0.27-0.58). CONCLUSIONS: We propose that cariprazine may be useful in treating psychosis independently of nosological differentiation at the beginning of the treatment Key pointsEarly treatment of psychotic illness with antipsychotic medications improves outcomes and reduces relapse rates.Cariprazine was found to be significantly superior to placebo for acute psychosis independently of primary psychiatric diagnosis.Cariprazine may be useful in treating psychosis independently of nosological differentiation between schizophrenia and bipolar disorder at the beginning of the treatment.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT Objective: Verify the clinical efficacy and safety of a low-cost tDCS device, in a clinical trial for major depressive disorder. Methods: 168 persons were recruited; 32 depressed individuals with moderate or severe depressive symptoms (HDRS17 scores higher than 18) were included and randomized for the trial (16 individuals in each group). The intervention consisted of 10 active anodal tDCS sessions at 2 mA for 30 minutes over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; or sham. The main outcome was HDRS17; secondary outcomes included satisfaction (TSQM II) and quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF). Assessments at baseline, endpoint and at 30 days follow-up. Results: The sample was composed by a total of 11 men and 21 women, mean age of 42.75 years (95% CI: 38.10-47.40). Active treatment was superior than sham: There was a significant interaction between group and time regarding HDRS-17 scores (F = 4.089, df = 2, p = 0.029; partial Eta squared = 0. 239). Post hoc analyses exhibited a statistically significant difference between active and sham group symptoms after a 30 days follow-up (difference = -7.75, p = 0.008, Cohen's d = 1.069). There were 3 dropouts, all in the active group, due schedule issues. No severe adverse effects reported. Conclusion: The current active tDCS protocol was related with clinical improvement of depressive symptoms. Intervention was well-tolerated. Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques are still not routinely used, although a viable strategy for treatment-resistant patients, partial responders and people unable to use pharmacological treatment. We aim to increase knowledge and use of tDCS for the Brazilian population.

RESUMO Objetivo: Testar a eficácia clínica e a segurança de equipamento de estimulação elétrica transcraniana por corrente contínua (ETCC) de baixo custo em ensaio clínico para transtorno depressivo maior (TDM). Métodos: Foram recrutadas 168 pessoas e incluídos e randomizados 32 indivíduos com depressão moderada ou grave (escores na HDRS17 >18; 16 indivíduos em cada grupo). A intervenção consistiu de 10 sessões de ETCC ativa a 2 mA no córtex pré-frontal dorsolateral esquerdo por 30 minutos, ou sham. O desfecho principal foi HDRS17; os desfechos secundários foram satisfação (TSQM II) e qualidade de vida (WHOQOL-BREF). Avaliações no início, no final do tratamento e após 30 dias de seguimento. Resultados: A amostra foi composta de 11 homens e 21 mulheres, com idade média de 42,75 anos (IC 95%: 38,10 a 47,40). O tratamento ativo foi superior ao sham: houve interação significativa entre grupo e tempo em relação aos escores de HDRS17 na ANOVA (F = 4,089, df = 2, p = 0,029; partial Eta squared = 0,239). A análise post hoc mostrou diferença significativa na HDRS17 no follow-up após 30 dias (diferença = -7,75, p= 0,008, Cohen's d = 1,069). Houve 3 dropouts, todos no grupo ativo, devido a problemas de agenda. Não houve registro de efeitos adversos graves. Conclusão: O tratamento ativo teve relação com melhora clínica de sintomas depressivos. A intervenção foi bem tolerada. Técnicas de estimulação cerebral não invasivas ainda não são rotina na prática clínica, apesar de estratégias viáveis para pacientes resistentes a tratamento, respondedores parciais e pessoas com intolerância a medicamentos. Esperamos ampliar o conhecimento e o uso de protocolos de ETCC na população brasileira.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE:: This study is a critical review analyzing occurrence of treatment-emergent mania (TEM) related to transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and trigeminal nerve stimulation (TNS). METHOD:: We present a systematic review of the literature on TEM related to tDCS and TNS treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD), conducted in accordance with the recommendations from Cochrane Group and the PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS:: Our search identified few reported episodes of TEM in the literature. In fact, we found 11 trials focused on treatment of MDD (seven controlled trials of tDCS and four trials of TNS, three open label and one controlled). We highlight the need for safety assessment in clinical research settings to establish with precision and in larger samples the risks inherent to the technique under investigation. CONCLUSION:: Safety assessment is of fundamental importance in clinical research. TEM is a very important safety issue in MDD trials. Further and larger controlled trials will help to clarify both the safety and the clinical effects of combinations of pharmacotherapy and tDCS or TNS in daily clinical practice.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Abstract Objective: This study is a critical review analyzing occurrence of treatment-emergent mania (TEM) related to transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and trigeminal nerve stimulation (TNS). Method: We present a systematic review of the literature on TEM related to tDCS and TNS treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD), conducted in accordance with the recommendations from Cochrane Group and the PRISMA guidelines. Results: Our search identified few reported episodes of TEM in the literature. In fact, we found 11 trials focused on treatment of MDD (seven controlled trials of tDCS and four trials of TNS, three open label and one controlled). We highlight the need for safety assessment in clinical research settings to establish with precision and in larger samples the risks inherent to the technique under investigation. Conclusion: Safety assessment is of fundamental importance in clinical research. TEM is a very important safety issue in MDD trials. Further and larger controlled trials will help to clarify both the safety and the clinical effects of combinations of pharmacotherapy and tDCS or TNS in daily clinical practice.

Resumo Objetivo: O presente estudo consiste em uma revisão e análise crítica da ocorrência de mania tratamento-emergente (TEM) relacionada a estimulação transcraniana por corrente contínua (ETCC) e estimulação do nervo trigêmeo (TNS). Método: Apresentamos uma revisão sistemática de literatura sobre TEM relacionada a ETCC e TNS no tratamento de transtorno depressivo maior (TDM), conduzida de acordo com as recomendações do Grupo Cochrane e protocolo PRISMA. Resultados: A pesquisa identificou poucos relatos de TEM na literatura. Na verdade, foram encontrados 11 ensaios clínicos com foco no tratamento de TDM (sete estudos controlados de ETCC e quatro de TNS, sendo três abertos e um controlado). Destacamos a necessidade de avaliações de segurança em pesquisas clínicas para se estabelecer com maior precisão e em amostras maiores os riscos inerentes à técnica sob investigação. Conclusão: Avaliação de segurança é fundamental na pesquisa clínica. A TEM é um efeito adverso importante no tratamento do TDM. Maiores ensaios clínicos controlados ajudarão a esclarecer os efeitos clínicos e a segurança da combinação de psicotrópicos e ETCC ou TNS.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION:: We report a transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocol over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) combined with cognitive training in schizophrenia. METHOD:: We assessed psychotic symptoms in nine patients using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). All evaluations were scored at baseline, at the end of the intervention protocol, and during a 4-week follow-up. The tDCS protocol consisted of 10 consecutive sessions over 5-day periods. We placed the cathode over the right and the anode over the left DLPFC. For sham stimulation, we turned the device off after 60 seconds. Cognitive training consisted of the administration of N-back and sequence learning tasks. RESULTS:: We performed an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to adjust for the dependent variable PANSS, considering the interaction with baseline severity scores (p = 0.619). Mixed analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed no statistical significance between the groups regarding final PANSS scores. CONCLUSION:: The results failed to demonstrate that the concomitant use of tDCS and cognitive training is effective to improve clinical outcomes in patients with schizophrenia. The present findings should be analyzed with care, considering the small sample size. Larger controlled trials on electric/cognitive stimulation should be produced in order to enhance therapeutic strategies in schizophrenia.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a promising non-pharmacological intervention for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses have reported mixed results. OBJECTIVE: To review articles that assess the efficacy of TMS in PTSD treatment. METHODS: A systematic review using MEDLINE and other databases to identify studies from the first RCT available up to September 2015. The primary outcome was based on PTSD scores (continuous variable). The main outcome was Hedges' g. We used a random-effects model using the statistical packages for meta-analysis available in Stata 13 for Mac OSX. Heterogeneity was evaluated with I2 (> 35% for heterogeneity) and the χ2 test (p < 0.10 for heterogeneity). Publication bias was evaluated using a funnel plot. Meta-regression was performed using the random-effects model. RESULTS: Five RCTs (n = 118) were included. Active TMS was significantly superior to sham TMS for PTSD symptoms (Hedges' g = 0.74; 95% confidence interval = 0.06-1.42). Heterogeneity was significant in our analysis (I2 = 71.4% and p = 0.01 for the χ2 test). The funnel plot shows that studies were evenly distributed, with just one study located marginally at the edge of the funnel and one study located out of the funnel. We found that exclusion of either study did not have a significant impact on the results. Meta-regression found no particular influence of any variable on the results. CONCLUSION: Active TMS was superior to sham stimulation for amelioration of PTSD symptoms. Further RCTs with larger sample sizes are fundamental to clarify the precise impact of TMS in PTSD.

Asunto(s)