RESUMEN
Objective: To investigate the knowledge regarding clinical research among children at 8-18 years of age. The survey results will form the basis for developing public education program for this population. Methods: The survey was conducted among children at 8-18 years of age using WeChat and spot investigation between January 2016 and January 2017. According to different developmental stages, the survey population was divided into four groups: age 8-10, 11-13, 14-15 and 16-18 years. The level of knowledge regarding clinical research was analyzed. Results: Totally 1 329 questionnaires were issued and 1 233 effective questionnaires were returned with a recovery rate of 92.8%. The overall awareness rate regarding clinical research was 32.8% (405/1 233) . It revealed that 282 (22.9%) individuals thought that clinical research was to treat people like experimental rats. When asked "who have the final decision on research participation", the percentages of those who chose oneself, parents or guardian and doctor were 44.6% (550/1 233), 74.2% (915/1 233) and 36.8% (454/1 233) respectively. When asked "If you want to participate a study, but your parents or guardian do not agree, what would you do?", 33.9% (418/1 233) of individuals will "give up". As to "If you do not want to participate a study, but your parents or guardian think you should, what would you do?", 51.3% (632/1 233) chose "listen to parents" and 28.8% (355/1 233) chose "refuse the suggestions of parents or guardian". As to "what are your greatest concerns of participating an investigation?" , 68.1% (840/1 233) chose "worry about added pain or discomfort". but 58.0% (715/1 233) thought if "doctors and nurses take good care of me" their "concerns will reduce" or "feel better to participate in the research?". 55.6% (686/1 233) and 49.3% (608/1 233) individuals responded that they will "participate in an research?" when they "know that other people also participate the research" and when they "know the details regarding what will happen after the enrollment". Conclusions: The knowledge level of clinical research among children aged 8-18 years were not high. It is very necessary to promote the public education of clinical research for this population and also very necessary to address their concern regarding the research.
Asunto(s)
Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Adolescente , Ansiedad , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cefozopran is a parenteral cephalosporin with a broad spectrum of activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of cefozopran after single- and multiple-dose intravenous administration in healthy subjects, to provide clinical guidance in its application. METHODS: This was a single-center, open-label, randomized, two-phase study conducted in 12 subjects. In the single-dose phase, subjects were randomly assigned to receive single doses of 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 g of injected cefozopran hydrochloride in a three-way crossover design with a 5-day washout period between administrations. In the multiple-dose phase, subjects received 2.0 g every 12 h for 4 days. Plasma and urine pharmacokinetic samples were assayed by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated and analyzed statistically. Safety assessments were conducted throughout the study. RESULTS: Twelve healthy volunteers (six males and six females) were enrolled and completed the study. Following a single 1-h intravenous infusion of 0.5, 1.0 or 2.0 g cefozopran, maximum plasma concentration (C max) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of the last measurable concentration (AUClast) increased in a dose-proportional manner. The mean half-life in plasma (t ½) was in the range of 1.20-2.80 h. Cefozopran was mainly excreted in its unchanged form, with no tendency for accumulation, via the kidney, and varied from 65.99 to 73.33 %. No appreciable accumulation of either drug occurred with multiple intravenous doses of cefozopran, and pharmacokinetic parameters for cefozopran were similar on days 1 and 4. No serious adverse events were reported. Adverse events were generally mild. CONCLUSION: Cefozopran was safe and well tolerated in the volunteers and displayed linear increases in the C max and AUClast values.