RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the incidence of Runt-related transcription factor 1 (RUNX1) gene and its associated gene mutations in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and analyze its clinical characteristics and prognosis. METHODS: The genomic DNA-PCR method was used to detect the exon of RUNX1 gene, and the gene mutations were analyzed by genetic sequencing. NPM1, DNMT3A, FLT3-ITD, IDH1/2, K/N-RAS, CEPBA, TET2, and WT1 co-mutations were also detected. Patients were followed up to determine efficacy and prognosis. RESULTS: Among 171 patients, the RUNX1 gene mutation was detected in 17 cases, and the mutation rate was 9.9%. The type of RUNX1 gene mutation was 9 missense mutations, 4 frameshift mutations, and 4 nonsense mutations. The peripheral blood leukocyte count of the patients in mutation group was 3 (1-101) ×109/L, which was significantly lower than those in the non-mutation group [26 (1-298)×109/L] (P=0.002), while the platelet count was 79 (22-166)×109/L, which was higher than 50 (8-351)×109/L in the non-mutation group (P=0.010), and the proportion of bone marrow blasts of the patients in the mutation group was 37 (0-72)%, which was lower than 53 (0-98)% in the non-mutation group (P=0.020). The RUNX1 mutation rate in M0 type was 55.6%, and in M4 type was 13.6%, which was significantly higher than other FAB subtypes (P=0.003). There was no significant difference in age, sex, hemoglobin concentration, and counts of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (P>0.05). The prognosis of cytogenetics in the patients in the middle and high-risk groups was 88.1% and 89.7%, which were significantly higher than that in the low-risk group, and the difference showed statistically significant (P=0.018). There was no significantly relationship between RUNX1 and specific karyotype abnormalities, including Trisomy 8, Del (7q), t (8; 21), and Inv (16) (P>0.05). There was a significant relationship between RUNX1 gene mutation and IDH1/2, N/K-RAS gene mutation (P<0.01). The complete response rate (CR) of the patients with chemotherapy in the RUNX1 mutation group(37.5%) was significantly lower than 79.4% in the non-mutated group (P=0.001). The overall survival (OS) of the patients in RUNX1 gene mutation group was lower than that in non-mutation group (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: AML patients with RUNX1 gene mutation shows unique clinical and biological characteristics, RUNX1 mutation can be regarded as a molecular marker of poor prognosis in AML patients.