Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Grad Med Educ ; 9(6): 716-720, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29270260

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In 2013, milestone ratings became a reporting requirement for emergency medicine (EM) residency programs. Programs rate each resident in the fall and spring on 23 milestone subcompetencies. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the incidence of straight line scoring (SLS) for EM Milestone ratings, defined as a resident being assessed the same score across the milestone subcompetencies. METHODS: This descriptive analysis measured the frequencies of SLS for all Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited EM programs during the 2015-2016 academic year. Outcomes were the frequency of SLS in the fall and spring milestone assessments, changes in the number of SLS reports, and reporting trends. Chi-square analysis compared nominal variables. RESULTS: There were 6257 residents in the fall and 6588 in the spring. Milestone scores were reported for 6173 EM residents in the fall (99% of 6257) and spring (94% of 6588). In the fall, 93% (5753 residents) did not receive SLS ratings and 420 (7%) did, with no significant difference compared with the spring (5776 [94%] versus 397 [6%]). Subgroup analysis showed higher SLS results for residents' first ratings (183 of 2136 versus 237 of 4220, P < .0001) and for their final ratings (200 of 2019 versus 197 of 4354, P < .0001). Twenty percent of programs submitted 10% or more SLS ratings, and a small percentage submitted more than 50% of ratings as SLS. CONCLUSIONS: Most programs did not submit SLS ratings. Because of the statistical improbability of SLS, any SLS ratings reduce the validity assertions of the milestone assessments.


Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica/normas , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/normas , Evaluación Educacional/métodos , Medicina de Emergencia/educación , Internado y Residencia/normas , Acreditación/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Consejos de Especialidades , Estados Unidos
3.
Acad Emerg Med ; 20(7): 724-9, 2013 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23782404

RESUMEN

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) has outlined its "Next Accreditation System" (NAS) that will focus on resident and residency outcome measurements. Emergency medicine (EM) is one of seven specialties that will implement the NAS beginning July 2013. All other specialties will follow in July 2014. A key component of the NAS is the development of assessable milestones, which are explicit accomplishments or behaviors that occur during the process of residency education. Milestones describe competencies more specifically and identify specialty-specific knowledge, skills, attitudes, and behaviors (KSABs) that can be used as outcome measures within the general competencies. The ACGME and the American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) convened an EM milestone working group to develop the EM milestones. This article describes the development, use within the NAS, and challenges of the EM milestones.


Asunto(s)
Acreditación/normas , Competencia Clínica/normas , Medicina de Emergencia/educación , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Internado y Residencia/normas , Masculino , Estados Unidos
5.
Am J Emerg Med ; 28(3): 385.e5-8, 2010 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20223404

RESUMEN

Posterior sternoclavicular joint dislocations (PSCJDs) are extremely rare, emergent injuries. We present an unprecedented case of a 16-year-old boy without any initial history or signs of trauma who died of a brachiocephalic vein laceration secondary to an occult PSCJD. The pathophysiology, treatment, and diagnosis of PSCJD are discussed.


Asunto(s)
Venas Braquiocefálicas/lesiones , Luxaciones Articulares/etiología , Articulación Esternoclavicular/lesiones , Accidentes por Caídas , Adolescente , Resultado Fatal , Humanos , Masculino
8.
Ann Emerg Med ; 41(4): 513-29, 2003 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12658252

RESUMEN

Patients with severely increased blood pressure often present to the emergency department. Emergency physicians evaluate and treat hypertension in various contexts, ranging from the compliant patient with well-controlled blood pressure to the asymptomatic patient with increased blood pressure to the critically ill patient with increased blood pressure and acute target-organ deterioration. Despite extensive study and national guidelines for the assessment and treatment of chronically increased blood pressure, there is no clear consensus on the acute management of patients with severely increased blood pressure. In this article, we examine the broad spectrum of disease, from the asymptomatic to critically ill patient, and the dilemma it creates for the emergency physician in deciding how and when in the process to intervene.


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento de Urgencia/métodos , Hipertensión/terapia , Enfermedad Aguda , Cuidados Posteriores , Antihipertensivos/clasificación , Antihipertensivos/farmacología , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Determinación de la Presión Sanguínea , Manejo de Caso , Urgencias Médicas , Medicina de Emergencia/métodos , Medicina de Emergencia/normas , Tratamiento de Urgencia/normas , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Hipertensión/diagnóstico , Hipertensión/etiología , Tamizaje Masivo , Rol del Médico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA