RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite the detrimental impact of abnormal glucose metabolism on cardiovascular prognosis after myocardial infarction (MI), diabetes is both underdiagnosed and undertreated. We investigated associations between structured diabetes care routines in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) and detection and treatment of diabetes at one-year post-MI. METHODS: Center-level data was derived from the Perfect-CR survey, which evaluated work routines applied at Swedish CR centers (n = 76). Work routines involving diabetes care included: (1) routine assessment of fasting glucose and/or HbA1c, (2) routine use of oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), (3) having regular case rounds with diabetologists, and (4) whether glucose-lowering medication was adjusted by CR physicians. Patient-level data was obtained from the national MI registry SWEDEHEART (n = 7601, 76% male, mean age 62.6 years) and included all post-MI patients irrespective of diabetes diagnosis. Using mixed-effects regression we estimated differences between patients exposed versus. not exposed to the four above-mentioned diabetes care routines. Outcomes were newly detected diabetes and the proportion of patients receiving oral glucose-lowering medication at one-year post-MI. RESULTS: Routine assessment of fasting glucose/HbA1c was performed at 63.2% (n = 48) of the centers, while 38.2% (n = 29) reported using OGTT for detecting glucose abnormalities. Glucose-lowering medication adjusted by CR physicians (n = 13, 17.1%) or regular case rounds with diabetologists (n = 7, 9.2%) were less frequently reported. In total, 4.0% of all patients (n = 304) were diagnosed with diabetes during follow-up and 17.9% (n = 1361) were on oral glucose-lowering treatment one-year post-MI. Routine use of OGTT was associated with a higher rate of newly detected diabetes at one-year (risk ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.62 [1.26, 1.98], p = 0.0007). At one-year a higher proportion of patients were receiving oral glucose-lowering medication at centers using OGTT (1.22 [1.07, 1.37], p = 0.0046) and where such medication was adjusted by CR physicians (1.31 [1.06, 1.56], p = 0.0155). Compared to having none of the structured diabetes care routines, the more routines implemented the higher the rate of newly detected diabetes (from 0 routines: 2.7% to 4 routines: 6.3%; p for trend = 0.0014). CONCLUSIONS: Having structured routines for diabetes care implemented within CR can improve detection and treatment of diabetes post-MI. A cluster-randomized trial is warranted to ascertain causality.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores , Glucemia , Rehabilitación Cardiaca , Diabetes Mellitus , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa , Hemoglobina Glucada , Hipoglucemiantes , Infarto del Miocardio , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Glucemia/metabolismo , Glucemia/efectos de los fármacos , Suecia/epidemiología , Anciano , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio/rehabilitación , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio/sangre , Resultado del Tratamiento , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Hemoglobina Glucada/metabolismo , Factores de Tiempo , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Biomarcadores/sangre , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Control Glucémico , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Pautas de la Práctica en MedicinaRESUMEN
Background Ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring has long been used to monitor BP in hypertension and lately emerged as a useful tool to detect hypotensive susceptibility in reflex syncope. However, hemodynamic characteristics in reflex syncope have not been sufficiently explored. The present study investigated the differences between ambulatory BP monitoring profiles associated with reflex syncope and normal population. Methods and Results This is an observational study comparing ambulatory BP monitoring data from 50 patients with reflex syncope and 100 controls without syncope, age- and sex-matched 1:2. Mean 24-hour systolic (SBP) and diastolic BP, pulse pressure (24-hour PP), dipping status, and number of daytime SBP drops <90 to 100 mm Hg were analyzed. Variables associated with reflex syncope were investigated using multivariable logistic regression. Patients with reflex syncope displayed significantly lower 24-hour SBP (112.9±12.6 versus 119.3±11.5 mm Hg, P=0.002), higher 24-hour diastolic BP (85.2±9.6 versus 79.1±10.6 mm Hg, P<0.001), and markedly lower 24-hour PP (27.7±7.6 versus 40.3±9.0 mm Hg, P<0.001) compared with controls. Daytime SBP drops <90 mm Hg were more prevalent in patients with syncope (44% versus 17%, P<0.001). Daytime SBP drops <90 mm Hg, 24-hour PP <32 mm Hg, 24-hour SBP ≤110 mm Hg, and 24-hour diastolic BP ≥82 mm Hg were independently associated with reflex syncope, with 24-hour PP <32 mm Hg achieving the highest sensitivity (80%) and specificity (86%). Conclusions Patients with reflex syncope have lower 24-hour SBP but higher 24-hour diastolic BP and more frequent daytime SBP drops <90 mm Hg than individuals without syncope. Our results support the presence of lower SBP and PP in reflex syncope and suggest a role for ambulatory BP monitoring in the diagnostic work-up of this condition.
Asunto(s)
Hipertensión , Síncope Vasovagal , Humanos , Presión Sanguínea/fisiología , Monitoreo Ambulatorio de la Presión Arterial/métodos , Hipertensión/diagnóstico , Síncope/diagnóstico , ReflejoRESUMEN
AIMS: Diagnostic criteria for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in patients with suspected reflex syncope are lacking. The study hypothesis was that patients with reflex syncope have a higher prevalence of systolic blood pressure (SBP) drops on ABPM. METHODS AND RESULTS: ABPM data from reflex syncope patients and controls, matched by average 24â h SBP, age, sex, and hypertension were compared. Patients with constitutional hypotension, orthostatic hypotension, and predominant cardioinhibition during carotid sinus massage or prolonged electrocardiogram monitoring or competing causes of syncope were excluded. Daytime and nighttime SBP drops (<110, 100, 90, 80â mmHg) were assessed. Findings were validated in an independent sample. In the derivation sample, daytime SBP drops were significantly more common in 158 syncope patients than 329 controls. One or more daytime drops <90â mmHg achieved 91% specificity and 32% sensitivity [odds ratio (OR) 4.6, P < 0.001]. Two or more daytime drops <100â mmHg achieved 84% specificity and 40% sensitivity (OR 3.5, P = 0.001). Results were confirmed in the validation sample of 164 syncope patients and 164 controls: one or more daytime SBP drops <90â mmHg achieved 94% specificity and 29% sensitivity (OR 6.2, P < 0.001), while two or more daytime SBP drops <100â mmHg achieved 83% specificity and 35% sensitivity (OR 2.6, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: SBP drops during ABPM are more common in reflex syncope patients than in controls. Cut-off values that may be applied in clinical practice are defined. This study expands the current indications for ABPM to patients with reflex syncope.