RESUMEN
Objective:To investigate the current status of vocational training for pediatric clinical research coordinators (CRC), and discuss the construction of base-based pediatric CRC training, and to promote the ability of pediatric CRCs.Methods:From July 25 to October 16, 2023, an anonymous self-designed questionnaire survey was conducted through the Wenjuanxing platform to investigate the current situation of pediatric CRC vocational training and base training needs. The data were collated using Excel. Categorical data were described as numbers and percentages.Results:A total of 328 usable questionnaires were returned. Only 7.62% (25 people) believed that existing CRC training was sufficient and could meet actual work needs; 4.88% (16 people) responded that there was no training; 46.34% (152 people) believed that the training was insufficient to support actual work needs; 87.50% (287 people) believed that continuous CRC training was needed; 46.95% (154 people) preferred experienced CRCs for teaching, who should have at least 3 years of CRC work experience; and 46.95% (154 people) preferred a duration of 3 months for CRC training. The preferred training methods were: practice under the direction of experienced CRCs (90.85%, 298 people), step-by-step teaching of practical skills (88.41%, 290 people), case analysis and discussion (87.20%, 286 people), process simulation (83.23%, 273 people), and lecture-based teaching (76.52%, 251 people). The preferred post-training assessment methods were: case analysis (76.52%, 251 people), operation simulation (74.09%, 243 people), process simulation (73.17%, 240 people), written examination (66.16%, 217 people), and interview (63.72%, 209 people).Conclusions:The current pediatric CRC training is not enough to meet actual work needs. It is urgent to develop and promote a CRC training system that can meet work needs, laying the foundation for the construction of pediatric clinical research ecology in China.
RESUMEN
Objective:To understand the current situation and problems of pediatric drug clinical trials in China, and provide reference for the healthy development of pediatric drug clinical trials.Methods:Such keywords as " pediatrics" " children" " annual reports" " children′s drug research and development" " policies" were used, to search for information on China′s pediatric drug research and development policies and regulations, pediatric drug clinical trial institutions and pediatric drug clinical trial professional registration status, as well as pediatric drug clinical trial project registration status as of October 2023 on the drug clinical trial institution registration management information platforms and relevant government department websites. Then descriptive analysis was made on the collected information.Results:China has released 9 policies and regulations on pediatric drug research and development, supporting the development of new varieties, dosage forms, and specifications of pediatric drugs that meet the physiological characteristics of children, and giving priority review and approval to pediatric drugs. 477 drug technology guiding principles have been released, but only 14 of them were specifically designed for pediatric populations. As of March 20, 2023, there were a total of 272 registered pediatric drug clinical trial institutions, accounting for 20.72% of the total number of registered institutions. The top 5 provinces for their number of registered institutions were Guangdong province (34), Henan province (21), Zhejiang province (20), Beijing (20), and Jiangsu province (18); A total of 26 clinical trial specialties for pediatric drugs have been registered, with the largest number of registrations being pediatric respiratory (143), pediatric hematology (72), pediatrics other (71), pediatric endocrinology (68), and pediatric neurology (64). From 2020 to 2022, the proportion of pediatric drug clinical trial registration projects in newly registered drug clinical trials was 8.8% (129/1 473), 8.3% (168/2 033), and 8.3% (164/1 974), respectively, while clinical trials conducted only in the pediatric population accounted for 2.2% (33/1 473), 3.0% (61/2 033), and 3.2% (64/1 974), respectively.Conclusions:The policies and regulations on pediatric drug research and development in China still need further improvement. The number of registered pediatric drug clinical trial institutions and pediatric specialties is lower than that of adults and distributed unevenly. Clinical trial registration projects for pediatric drugs, especially those conducted in the pediatric population, account for a relatively small proportion. It is recommended to further improve the policy system for drug research and development in the pediatric population, optimize the layout of pediatric drug clinical trial institutions and specialties in the country.
RESUMEN
【Objective:】 To analyze and explore the key points of the ethical review of real-world research in pediatric population, and to provide reference for ethical review of real-world research in pediatric population. 【Methods:】 According to the characteristics of real-world research and pediatric clinical trials, the review points of real-world research in pediatric population were analyzed and discussed in comparison with the principles and focus of ethical review in general clinical research. 【Results:】 The ethics committee should pay particular attention to the review of informed consent, privacy protection, risk benefit assessment, cost and compensation, and should also take into account the research design, data governance, research conflicts of interest, research registration and publication, etc., and conduct scientific and reasonable ethical review of real-world research in pediatric population. 【Conclusion:】 Clinical trials in pediatric population should have stricter and scientific ethical review, which can not only protect the interests of vulnerable groups of minors, but also standardize real-world research in pediatric population and promote the healthy development of pediatric clinical research, so as to better protect children and promote their health.
RESUMEN
By collecting 475 protocol violation reports of pediatric clinical trials accepted by the ethics committee of a grade A tertiary hospital from January 2016 to December 2022, and conducting classification statistics of the responsible body, types of violation, and natures of violation, this paper analyzed and discussed the specific reasons and response measures for protocol violation. The results showed that the most common types of protocol violation included missed medication and incorrect medication dosage for pediatric research participants, missed laboratory inspection, over-windowed follow-up, and non-compliance with inclusion/exclusion criteria. And the responsibility bodies were pediatric research participants and/or their guardians, followed by the researchers. Besides, the sponsor, clinical trial coordinator, and other factors also contributed to protocol violation. Establishing awareness of responsible body, emphasizing subject management, building sound quality control system, and strengthening ethical supervision are the main countermeasures to prevent and reduce protocol violation in pediatric clinical trials, which helps to protect the safety and rights of pediatric research participants and promote standardized research in pediatric clinical trials.
RESUMEN
Objective@#To investigate the knowledge regarding clinical research among children at 8-18 years of age. The survey results will form the basis for developing public education program for this population.@*Methods@#The survey was conducted among children at 8-18 years of age using WeChat and spot investigation between January 2016 and January 2017. According to different developmental stages, the survey population was divided into four groups: age 8-10, 11-13, 14-15 and 16-18 years. The level of knowledge regarding clinical research was analyzed.@*Results@#Totally 1 329 questionnaires were issued and 1 233 effective questionnaires were returned with a recovery rate of 92.8%. The overall awareness rate regarding clinical research was 32.8% (405/1 233) . It revealed that 282 (22.9%) individuals thought that clinical research was to treat people like experimental rats. When asked "who have the final decision on research participation", the percentages of those who chose oneself, parents or guardian and doctor were 44.6% (550/1 233), 74.2% (915/1 233) and 36.8% (454/1 233) respectively. When asked "If you want to participate a study, but your parents or guardian do not agree, what would you do?", 33.9% (418/1 233) of individuals will "give up". As to "If you do not want to participate a study, but your parents or guardian think you should, what would you do?", 51.3% (632/1 233) chose "listen to parents" and 28.8% (355/1 233) chose "refuse the suggestions of parents or guardian". As to "what are your greatest concerns of participating an investigation?" , 68.1% (840/1 233) chose "worry about added pain or discomfort". but 58.0% (715/1 233) thought if "doctors and nurses take good care of me" their "concerns will reduce" or "feel better to participate in the research?". 55.6% (686/1 233) and 49.3% (608/1 233) individuals responded that they will "participate in an research?" when they "know that other people also participate the research" and when they "know the details regarding what will happen after the enrollment".@*Conclusions@#The knowledge level of clinical research among children aged 8-18 years were not high. It is very necessary to promote the public education of clinical research for this population and also very necessary to address their concern regarding the research.