RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The therapeutic benefits of Niaoduqing granules (NDQG) in kidney diseases has been comprehensively studied, but its adverse drug reactions remain unexplored. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety of NDQG in kidney disease treatment. METHODS: The literature was searched in Embase, Medline via PubMed, Cochrane Library database, Wanfang database, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, SinoMed, and Chinese VIP Database from inception to January 15, 2022, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. The ClinicalTrials.gov website was searched for ongoing trials. The frequency and characteristics of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were the primary and secondary outcomes, respectively. Subgroup analysis were conducted to explore the effects of clinical trial types, different kidney diseases, drug combinations and dosage on the safety of NDQG. RESULTS: This review included 132 trials comprising 115 RCTs and 17 cohort studies. Additionally, 118 studies reported ADR rates with complete data, including 10381 participants. Regarding ADR frequency, no significant difference was observed between NDQG (7.26%) and control (8.39%) groups (RR = 0.890, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.788-1.007); with no heterogeneity among the studies (I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.958). ADR frequency in patients with chronic kidney disease (65 trials, n = 5823) was significantly lower in the NDQG treatment group than in the control group (RR = 0.810, 95% CI: 0.67-0.969, I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.993); however, for patients with diabetic nephropathy there was no difference between both groups (26 trials, n = 2166, RR = 1.077, 95% CI: 0.802-1.446, I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.611). Similarly, the incidence of ADR in patients on dialysis and patients with pyelonephritis and nephrotic syndrome was the same for both groups, with 95% CI overlapping the line. For different interventions, including NDQG monotherapy or its combination with other commonly used drugs (including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, statin drugs, and compound α-keto acid) or dialysis, the incidence of ADR showed no significant difference between the experimental and control arms. The ADR in the NDQG group primarily affected the gastrointestinal system (64.74%), central and peripheral nervous system (9.07%), whole body (5.79%), and skin and appendages (4.53%). The most common clinical manifestations were diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis showed that compared with supportive therapy, the incidence of ADR was similar when NDQG was added. However, current evidence is not definitive and more well-designed and conducted RCTs are warranted to definitively establish the reliable evidence. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD 42018104227.
Asunto(s)
Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , Síndrome Nefrótico , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Humanos , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome Nefrótico/tratamiento farmacológico , Piel , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In traditional Chinese medicine, Sinomenii Caulis contains Sinomenine (SIN), one of the major active ingredients. According to some studies, SIN can reduce proteinuria and provides clinical effectiveness rates in diabetic kidney disease (DKD) patients, however, the evidence is not strong and mechanisms of action are unclear. The efficacy and safety of SIN in treating DKD were evaluated by meta-analysis, and the potential mechanism of SIN therapy for DKD was initially explored by network pharmacology. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and SinoMed databases were comprehensively searched until March 28, 2022. Randomized controlled trials on DKD treated with SIN were selected. The main results were clinical effective rate and the secondary results were the decrease in 24-hour urine total protein (24-hour UTP), serum creatinine, adverse reactions, etc. Drug combinations and disease stages were analyzed in subgroups. Sensitivity analysis was performed for 24-hour UTP. The potential target genes and pathways of SIN in treating DKD were studied using protein-protein interactions, gene ontology, and the Kyoto Genome Encyclopedia and Genomes enrichment analysis. RESULTS: The meta-analysis included 7 randomized controlled trials. SIN treatment had a higher clinical effectiveness rate than conventional treatment (relative riskâ =â 1.53, 95% confidence interval [1.30; 1.80], Zâ =â 5.14, Pâ <â .0001); the decrease in 24-hour UTP, treatment group was higher than control group (standardized mean differenceâ =â -1.12, 95% confidence interval [-1.71; -0.52], Zâ =â -3.69, Pâ =â .0002); In the experimental group, adverse reactions were more common than in the control group. SIN mainly affected 5 target genes, NFκB-1, TNF, interleukin 6, interleukin 1ß and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3, and IL-17, AGE-RAGE signaling pathways, lipids, and atherosclerosis were all controlled to achieve therapeutic effects. CONCLUSION: SIN is an effective and safe drug for treating DKD, enhancing clinical efficacy, and reducing proteinuria. The main potential mechanism is anti-inflammatory.