RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Traumatic diaphragmatic injury (TDI), although rare, is associated with high mortality and morbidity and timely recognition is important. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of a 44-year-old male who fell from a three-story building and presented with complaints of shortness of breath and chest pain. On examination, his chest compression test and extended focused assessment with sonography in trauma (E-FAST) were positive. Chest X-ray showed loss of diaphragmatic contour, fracture of fifth to eleventh ribs on the left side, and opacities in the left hemithorax. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography of chest, abdomen, and pelvis showed bowel loops over the left hemithorax with grade 1 splenic injury. A diagnosis of ruptured diaphragmatic hernia with grade I splenic injury was made and emergency primary repair of the diaphragm was done via thoracotomy. DISCUSSION: Clinical diagnosis of TDI is difficult and can be misdiagnosed as a pneumothorax. In addition, the subtle presentation can often be missed. CT scan of the chest and abdomen is the imaging of choice to reach a diagnosis. Once diagnosed, emergency surgery via laparotomy or thoracotomy is mandatory. Delay in diagnosis can have a fatal consequence or delayed complications which have high mortality. CONCLUSION: Diaphragmatic injury should be suspected in all blunt thoracoabdominal traumas, and the presence of this injury should be excluded to prevent late complications. Timely intervention can provide excellent outcomes.
RESUMEN
Introduction: Hyponatremia is one of the common electrolyte abnormalities in intensive care unit settings. Hyponatremia may lead to an increased hospital stay, morbidity and mortality. Hyponatremia can occur due to a variety of iatrogenic as well as part of complex disease processes during hospital admission. The objective of this study was to find the prevalence of hyponatremia in patients admitted to the intensive care unit of a tertiary care centre. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in the intensive care unit of a tertiary care centre for a duration of six months from 12 August 2015 to 11 January 2016. Ethical approval was taken from the Institutional Review Committee (Reference number: 124/6-11-E/072/073). Data was collected from hospital records. Patients with abnormal serum sodium levels after admission to the intensive care unit were included in the study. Hyponatremia was defined as a serum sodium level less than 135 mEq/L. Convenience sampling methods were used. Point estimate and 95% Confidence Interval were calculated. Results: Among 102 patients, the prevalence of hyponatremia was found to be 21 (20.59%) (12.74-28.44, 95% Confidence Interval). Conclusions: The prevalence of hyponatremia in patients admitted to the intensive care unit was higher than in other studies conducted in similar settings. Keywords: cross-sectional study; prevalence; sodium.
Asunto(s)
Hiponatremia , Humanos , Hiponatremia/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Sodio , Centros de Atención TerciariaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Severe sepsis and septic shock are major causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide and need immediate medical attention. Early recognition, fluid resuscitation and early antimicrobials are the mainstays of sepsis therapy. This study analyzed the management strategies of severe sepsis and septic shock and evaluated its impact. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted on patients admitted through emergency department of Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital of Nepal, who were diagnosed with severe sepsis and septic shock. RESULTS: A total of 85 patients were diagnosed as severe sepsis and septic shock with 45 female patients and mean age 47.69 years ranging from 18 to 83 years. Pneumonia (45.9%) was found to be the major source of infection. The most commonly prescribed antibiotics and vassopressor at emergency department were ceftriaxone (24.7%) and norepinephrine (44.7%) respectively. The mean length of stay in Emergency department was 13.01 ± 7.03 h, while it was 11.27 ± 5.26 days in hospital. A total of 31 (36.5%) septic patients died. Deceased patients were found to have greater age, higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score and presence of co-morbid conditions. CONCLUSIONS: This study looked in-depth on management and outcome of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Mortality from severe sepsis and septic shock were high, but similar to other studies.