RESUMEN
Objective: In patients with heart failure (HF), anxiety and depression are commonly observed and confer an adverse outcome. The first-in-class member of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), sacubitril/valsartan has been demonstrated to improve functional class and decrease mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and reduce the readmission of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, its effects on anxiety and depression levels remain unknown.Methods: Sacubitril/valsartan was started on 764 symptomatic patients with HFrEF and HFpEF who were receiving guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB). Patients were evaluated using Hamilton's depression rating scale (HDRS) and the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) for their levels of depression and anxiety before and after treatment at a six-month follow-up.Results: A significant reduction in HADS and HDRS scores was observed in patients with HFrEF (9.7 ± 1.3 to 6.4 ± 0.7, p = 0.032 and 19.2 ± 2.2 to 8.9 ± 1.6, p < 0.001, respectively) compared with HFpEF (p = 0.161 and 0.273, respectively). The six-minute walk test (6-MWT) significantly increased HFrEF from 195 ± 68 to 321 ± 97 (p < 0.001). There was an overall improvement in the functional class of all patients.Conclusion: Patients with HFrEF have the additional advantage of using sacubitril/valsartan in the form of decreased anxiety and depression symptoms in addition to an improvement in functional class. However, patients with HFpEF did not exhibit significant improvement in their psychological scores.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The disruption of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) causes more adverse events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, incidence and predictors of DAPT non-compliance are unknown in chronic coronary syndrome patients when compared between planned and ad hoc PCI. METHODS: This investigation was aimed to assess the incidence, predictors, outcomes, and primary mode of non-compliance of DAPT in patients with chronic coronary syndrome undergoing their first PCI. We analyzed the patients between planned (group 1) and ad hoc (group 2) PCI. RESULTS: There were a total of 628 participants in this investigation (370 were in planned PCI and 270 in the ad hoc PCI group). Out of 628 patients, by one month, 10% left DAPT in planned PCI group and 19.7% in ad hoc PCI group (aOR: 0.451, 95% CI: 0.285-0.713, p = 0.001). At 12 months, DAPT non-compliance was significantly more in ad hoc PCI group (52.7% vs. 47.8%; aOR: 0.647 95% CI: 0.470-0.891, p = 0.008). Age > 65 years (p < 0.001), low education status (p = 0.012), residents of rural areas (p < 0.001), ad hoc PCI group (p = 0.036), and angina class II (p = 0.038) were predictors for DAPT non-compliance in this cohort. CONCLUSION: Approximately 5 out of 10 patients disrupt DAPT due to non-compliance. This investigation provides an insight on additional predictors of non-compliance to DAPT, helping us to identify and address specific patient-related factors for disruption.