Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Indian J Dent Res ; 30(3): 450-454, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31397423

RESUMEN

AIMS: Dental implants have revolutionized the treatment modality for replacing missing teeth. The ability of implants to osseointegrate with the bone leads to its success. The problem is sometimes there is inadequate bone available for implant. If hygiene is not maintained, biofilms of bacteria can be formed around the dental implant. One approach to this problem has been development of bioactive surgical additives. Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) appears as an alternative. There are various techniques of using PRF. These techniques need skill and practice to use PRF. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate implant stability and flow of injectable PRF (i-PRF) of regular implant and modified innovative design implant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty goat jaw bones were selected. Implants were placed in mandibular posterior region. Fifteen implants were placed using regular dental implant system (Group A) on the left side of jaw bone. The other 15 implants were placed using modified dental implant (Group B) on the right side of jaw bone. The body of these implants at middle has drainage vents to drain/flow the i-PRF-like dye. The dye was injected through regular and modified implants (DV-PIMS technique). Then the stability was checked with the help of Periotest. Cross section was taken 3 cm away from dental implant at the angle of mandible, to check the flow of i-PRF/platelet-rich plasma (PRP)-like dye. RESULTS: Periotest evaluation showed a mean of 2.3 for implant Group B and a mean of 1.5 for implant Group A. The flow of i-PRF-like dye was seen in Group B, and Group A does not show any flow. CONCLUSION: There are various techniques of using PRF. These techniques need skill and practice to use PRF. This (DV-PIMS) method aims to explain new implant design that disperses an i-PRF solution from inside out. The screw section of the new implant is made of a reservoir running vertically down inside. That reservoir is filled with (injectable) PRF, and then a cover screw is placed. The solution will begin to slowly diffuse out, through the vents in implant, keeping biofilms from forming or avoiding at the screw-bone interface and accelerate healing process.


Asunto(s)
Implantes Dentales , Fibrina Rica en Plaquetas , Animales , Cadáver , Implantación Dental Endoósea , Cabras
2.
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent ; 3(2): 51-8, 2013 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24778980

RESUMEN

AIM: The aim of this study is to determine the etiology, frequency of mandibular fractures among different age and sex, to determine the frequency of anatomic distribution, and to report the different modalities of treatment provided to the patients reported at our institution from February 2008 to September 2009. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients fulfilling the selection criteria and having mandible fracture were selected for the study. Patient information was collected by means of a medical data form specifically designed for the present study. The values were subjected to Z and Chi-square tests. RESULTS: Out of 35 patients, thirty one were males (88.57%) and four were females (11.43%) with a male:female ratio of 8:1. We found a peak occurrence in young adults, aged 21-30 years (n = 15, 42.86%). In case of etiology of fracture, road traffic accidents (RTAs) was the most common (n = 25, 71.43%) and condyle was most frequently involved site (n = 19, 38.78%). In most (n = 16, 45.71%) of the patients, an open reduction and rigid internal fixation using bone plate and screws was done. CONCLUSION: In the present study, the prevalence of mandible fractures was more prevalent in male patients, especially during the 3(rd) decade of life. The most common cause was road traffic accident and the more frequently affected region was condyle of the mandible. Open reduction and rigid internal fixation using miniplates and screws was the most commonly used treatment.

3.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22863606

RESUMEN

Fibromatosis in the maxillofacial region is a very rare occurrence among diverse pathologic conditions, and because of the rarity of this tumor, definite treatment regimen is not established, which may be a contributing factor for a high recurrence rate. Fibromatosis may attain a large size and cause compression, infiltration, and destruction of adjacent structures. Such growth behavior presents severe management problems, especially in the head and neck region, where the presence of many vital structures within a small space makes the patient susceptible to the effects of the fibromatosis, likewise making complete excision difficult. We report the case of a 28-year-old female patient with aggressive desmoid fibromatosis involving the mandible, with a literature review of postoperative pharmacologic management to prevent recurrence.


Asunto(s)
Fibromatosis Agresiva/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Mandibulares/diagnóstico , Adulto , Biopsia/métodos , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Reconstrucción Mandibular/métodos , Radiografía Panorámica , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA