RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Preoperative cisplatin alone may be as effective as cisplatin plus doxorubicin in standard-risk hepatoblastoma (a tumor involving three or fewer sectors of the liver that is associated with an alpha-fetoprotein level of >100 ng per milliliter). METHODS: Children with standard-risk hepatoblastoma who were younger than 16 years of age were eligible for inclusion in the study. After they received one cycle of cisplatin (80 mg per square meter of body-surface area per 24 hours), we randomly assigned patients to receive cisplatin (every 14 days) or cisplatin plus doxorubicin administered in three preoperative cycles and two postoperative cycles. The primary outcome was the rate of complete resection, and the trial was powered to test the noninferiority of cisplatin alone (<10% difference in the rate of complete resection). RESULTS: Between June 1998 and December 2006, 126 patients were randomly assigned to receive cisplatin and 129 were randomly assigned to receive cisplatin plus doxorubicin. The rate of complete resection was 95% in the cisplatin-alone group and 93% in the cisplatin-doxorubicin group in the intention-to-treat analysis (difference, 1.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -4.1 to 7.0); these rates were 99% and 95%, respectively, in the per-protocol analysis. Three-year event-free survival and overall survival were, respectively, 83% (95% CI, 77 to 90) and 95% (95% CI, 91 to 99) in the cisplatin group, and 85% (95% CI, 79 to 92) and 93% (95% CI, 88 to 98) in the cisplatin-doxorubicin group (median follow-up, 46 months). Acute grade 3 or 4 adverse events were more frequent with combination therapy (74.4% vs. 20.6%). CONCLUSIONS: As compared with cisplatin plus doxorubicin, cisplatin monotherapy achieved similar rates of complete resection and survival among children with standard-risk hepatoblastoma. Doxorubicin can be safely omitted from the treatment of standard-risk hepatoblastoma. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00003912.)
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Hepatoblastoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Biopsia , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Niño , Preescolar , Cisplatino/efectos adversos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Doxorrubicina/efectos adversos , Femenino , Hepatoblastoma/mortalidad , Hepatoblastoma/cirugía , Humanos , Lactante , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Masculino , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Análisis de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
The study sought to evaluate the response to cyclophosphamide (CPM) in hepatoblastoma (HB). Patients with a refractory or relapsing HB after first-line therapy as per SIOPEL 2 and 3 protocols were eligible. All patients were to receive two courses of CPM 2 g/m(2) on days 1 and 2 at 3-week intervals. Eighteen patients were included; 17 were evaluable for response. Prior treatment was cisplatinum alone (1 patient) or cisplatinum-carboplatin-doxorubicin (17 patients). The disease status at the beginning of CPM was: progressive during first-line treatment (10 patients), persistent unresectable disease at the end of the protocol (2 patients), relapse (6 patients). Tumour response was partial response (1 patient), stable disease (1 patient), progressive disease (15 patients) and not evaluable in one. All patients died, 17 of progressive disease and one of surgery complications. The low response rate (1/17) led the SIOPEL group to conclude that single-agent CPM is not effective for the treatment of relapsing or refractory HB.