RESUMEN
At the beginning of 2020, the Italian Lombardy region was hit by an "epidemic tsunami" which was, at that point in time, one of the worst pandemics ever. At that moment the effects of SARS-COV 2 were still unknown. To evaluate whether the pandemic has influenced ART (Assisted Reproduction Techniques) outcomes in an asymptomatic infertile population treated at one of the major COVID-19 epicentres during the weeks immediately preceding lockdown. All ART procedures performed during two time periods were compared: November 1st, 2018 to February 28th, 2019 (non-COVID-19 risk) and November 1st, 2019 to February 29th, 2020 (COVID-19 risk). In total 1749 fresh cycles (883 non-COVID-19 risk and 866 COVID-19 risk) and1166 embryos and 63 oocytes warming cycles (538 and 37 during non-COVID and 628 and 26 during COVID-19 risk, respectively) were analysed. Clinical pregnancies per cycle were not different: 370 (25.38%) in non-COVID versus 415 (27.30%) (p = 0.237) during COVID-19 risk. There were no differences in biochemical pregnancy rates 52 (3.57%) versus 38 (2.50%) (p = 0.089) nor in ectopic pregnancies 4 (1.08%) versus 3 (0.72%) (p = 0.594), spontaneous miscarriages 84 (22.70%) versus 103 (24.82%) p = 0.487, nor in intrauterine ongoing pregnancies 282 (76.22%) versus 309 (74.46%) p = 0.569. A multivariate analysis investigating differences in spontaneous miscarriage rate showed no differences between the two timeframes. Our results support no differences in asymptomatic infertile couples' ART outcomes between the pre COVID and COVID-19 periods in one of the earliest and most severe pandemic areas.
Asunto(s)
Aborto Espontáneo/epidemiología , COVID-19/complicaciones , Infertilidad/terapia , Índice de Embarazo , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Infecciones Asintomáticas/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Pandemias , Embarazo , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/normas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The outcomes of 1028 assisted reproductive technology cycles were studied retrospectively, considering two different periods of embryo transfer. In the first period, 262 cycles in women < 36 years old were studied, in which three embryos were transferred, followed by 157 cycles in women > or = 36 years, in which four embryos were transferred. In the second period, 332 cycles were evaluated in women < 36 years and 277 cycles in women > or = 36 years old, reducing the number of embryos transferred to two and three respectively. Embryos were only scored morphologically, and the best embryos were chosen for transfer. In the first period, in women < 36 years old, a clinical pregnancy rate of 55.7% was achieved, compared with 42.5% in the second period (P < 0.01). In women > or = 36 years old, the first period of embryo transfer showed a clinical pregnancy rate of 39.5%, compared with 28.5% in the second period (P < 0.01). The number of twin pregnancies in the three groups of patients in whom one to four embryos were transferred was not significantly different (24.2, 28.4, 24.8%). It is concluded that even with the biases induced by a retrospective study, the reduction in the number of embryos transferred, from three to two in women < 36 years of age, and from four to three in women > or = 36 years of age, without any selection other than pre-transfer morphological score, adversely affects the outcome of treatment, without a significant reduction in twin gestation rate. Other strategies are to be implemented in gametes and embryo selection, and patients must be aware that, even with a reduction in pregnancy rate, the goal is to achieve a high cumulative pregnancy rate, reducing the complications induced by multiple pregnancies.