RESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Home parenteral nutrition (HPN) is indicated in patients with chronic intestinal failure. The aim of the current study was to review existing scientific literature of full or partial economic evaluations associated to HPN. METHODS: A bibliographic database search was undertaken in PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase and Scopus, complemented by a reference list search. We combined search terms regarding HPN and costs/health economics. The inclusion criteria included: a) population: all population and age groups; b) intervention: partial or full HPN; c) comparator: no parenteral nutrition, continued or intermittent hospital based PN, other nutritional interventions or no comparator; d) outcomes: cost outcomes and economic evaluations associated to HPN. A different quality assessment tool was used for each of the different type of economic approach. RESULTS: Twenty-three papers were included in the final review. 21 were partial economic evaluations (16 cost-of-illness studies and 5 cost analyses), and 2 were full economic evaluations, both cost-utility analysis. Most studies investigated costs from a healthcare perspective (n = 18), therefore they included only direct costs. Three studies included personal costs for HPN patient. None of the studies included productivity costs. CONCLUSIONS: Most scientific literature regarding the economic costs of HPN comes from partial economic evaluations, such as cost-of-illness studies and cost analysis. According to them, HPN is an expensive treatment, although cost saving when compared to hospital based parenteral nutrition (PN). Full economic evaluations proved HPN as being cost-effective than hospital based PN, however more research is needed to confirm this in all settings.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Intestinales/economía , Enfermedades Intestinales/terapia , Nutrición Parenteral en el Domicilio/economía , Enfermedad Crónica , Costo de Enfermedad , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitor, dapagliflozin, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and background glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP1-RA) therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a 12-month, real-world observational study, which assessed the effectiveness and safety of dapagliflozin in patients with T2DM and background GLP1-RA therapy. The main outcome measures were changes in A1C and weight at 6 and 12 months from baseline. Secondary outcomes were differences in A1C and weight reduction between this cohort and another group of patients with T2DM treated with dapagliflozin but without background GLP1-RA therapy. In total, 109 patients with GLP1-RA and 104 patients without GLP1-RA were included. Baseline mean A1C and weight in the GLP1-RA and non-GLP1-RA groups were 7.4% vs. 7.3% and 96.2 kg vs. 95.1 kg, respectively. A significant reduction in A1C was seen with dapagliflozin in both cohorts at 6 and 12 months (GLP1-RA: -0.51% and -0.34%, non-GLP1-RA: -0.69% and -0.62%, respectively, p < 0.0001 in all analyses). Weight was significantly reduced in both groups at 6 and 12 months (GLP1-RA: -2.3 kg and -2.4 kg, non-GLP1-RA: -3.9 kg and -4.8 kg, respectively, p < 0.0001 in all analyses). A1C reduction and weight loss were significantly lower in patients with GLP1-RA than in patients without GLP1-RAs. Drug discontinuation rates were similar in both cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Dapagliflozin, when added in real life to patients with T2DM treated with GLP1-RAs, induced a further significant, albeit modest improvement in A1C and a further weight loss.