RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incidence of musculoskeletal-related acute physical disability in the elderly (APDE). METHODS: A primary care-based registry was established in Madrid's Health Area 7 from October 1, 2005 to September 31, 2006. We included all persons age ≥65 years, who were non-institutionalized and covered by the health cards assigned to the participating general practitioners (GPs). A case of APDE was defined as a moderate mobility alteration in the disability level within the Rosser's Classification System, in the last 3 months, related to a musculoskeletal cause. Incidence rates (IRs) were estimated per 10,000 person-years by direct standardization with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). RESULTS: Eight primary care centers and 23 GPs participated in the registry, covering 8,546 elderly patients. In the inclusion year, the GPs identified 147 new APDE cases in 106 patients. The annual estimated incidence of APDE was 331 cases per 10,000 person-years (95% CI 280-389) and the IR of new patients with an APDE episode was 239 (95% CI 196-288); the IR was higher in women (344 cases; 95% CI 279.8-423.0) than in men (207 cases; 95% CI 127.0-338.2). CONCLUSION: The incidence estimate of acute physical disability related to musculoskeletal disorders in the elderly should help us to determine the magnitude of this health problem, as well as the first step to establishing a specific practice for the recovery of cases and for the prevention of loss of functioning, mobility, and independence.
Asunto(s)
Personas con Discapacidad , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/epidemiología , Atención Primaria de Salud , Sistema de Registros , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Personas con Discapacidad/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/fisiopatología , Atención Primaria de Salud/tendencias , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The clinical effect of surgical delay in older patients with hip fracture is controversial. Discrepancies among study findings may be due to confounding that is caused by the reason for the delay or a differential effect on patient risk subgroups. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of surgical delay on hospital outcomes according to the cause of delay. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: A hip fracture unit in a university hospital in Spain. PATIENTS: 2250 consecutive elderly patients with hip fracture. MEASUREMENTS: Time to surgery, reasons for surgical delay, adjusted in-hospital death, and risk for complications. RESULTS: Median time to surgery was 72 hours. Lack of operating room availability (60.7%) and acute medical problems (33.1%) were the main reasons for delays longer than 48 hours. Overall, rates of hospital death and complications were 4.35% and 45.9%, respectively, but were 13.7% and 74.2% in clinically unstable patients. Longer delays were associated with higher mortality rates and rates of medical complications. After adjustment for age, dementia, chronic comorbid conditions, and functionality, this association did not persist for delays of 120 hours or less but did persist for delays longer than 120 hours (P = 0.002 for overall time effect on death and 0.002 for complications). The risks were attenuated after adjustment for the presence of acute medical conditions as the cause of the delay (P = 0.06 for time effect on mortality and 0.31 on medical complications). Risk for urinary tract infection remained elevated (odds ratio, 1.54 [95% CI, 0.99 to 2.44]). No interaction between delay and age, dementia, or functional status was found. LIMITATION: This was a single-center study without postdischarge follow-up. CONCLUSION: The reported association between late surgery and higher morbidity and mortality in patients with hip fracture is mostly explained by medical reasons for surgical delay, although some association between very delayed surgery and worse outcomes persists. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: None.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Actividades Cotidianas , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Cardiopatías/complicaciones , Fracturas de Cadera/complicaciones , Fracturas de Cadera/mortalidad , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Estudios Prospectivos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/complicaciones , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of major geriatric syndromes (MGSs)-frailty, cognitive impairment, severe dependence and depression-and their influence on outcomes in unselected patients with acute cardiac diseases. DESIGN: Observational prospective study with 12-month clinical and functional follow-up. SETTING: Clinical cardiology unit of a university hospital in Madrid, Spain. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients ≥75 years old urgently admitted to the cardiology unit. INTERVENTION: Systematic comprehensive geriatric assessment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: 12-month rates of mortality, readmission, functional decline and need for new social help. RESULTS: Among the 211 patients studied, 127 (60.2%) presented at least one MGS on admission: 86 frailty (40.8%), 67 cognitive impairment (31.8%), 31 severe dependency (14.7%) and 9 depression (4.3%). Patients with MGSs were slightly older (82±5 vs 81±4 years, p=0.02) but did not show greater disease severity or comorbidity. The presence of MGSs was associated with a higher incidence of functional decline during hospitalisation (35.7% vs 8.6%, p=0.002) and higher 12-month age-, comorbidity- and diagnosis-adjusted risks of readmission (OR, 2.1.92; 95% CI 0.98 to 3.7), functional decline (OR, 2.86; 95% CI 1.41 to 5.79) and need for new social help (OR, 3.10; 95% CI 1.45 to 6.60). MGSs were also associated with a higher 12-month mortality rate, which was only obvious in patients hospitalised for heart failure but not for other reasons. CONCLUSIONS: A majority of older patients hospitalised for acute cardiac conditions in a cardiology department show at least one MGS on admission. MGSs are associated with poorer inhospital and postdischarge functional and clinical outcomes, particularly in patients with heart failure.
Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas , Envejecimiento , Trastornos del Conocimiento/epidemiología , Depresión/epidemiología , Anciano Frágil , Cardiopatías/epidemiología , Enfermedad Aguda , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Trastornos del Conocimiento/diagnóstico , Trastornos del Conocimiento/fisiopatología , Comorbilidad , Depresión/diagnóstico , Depresión/fisiopatología , Femenino , Evaluación Geriátrica , Cardiopatías/diagnóstico , Cardiopatías/fisiopatología , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Oportunidad Relativa , Readmisión del Paciente , Prevalencia , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Recuperación de la Función , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , España/epidemiología , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To analyze the effectiveness of a multicomponent intervention integrated into daily practice for the prevention of in-hospital delirium in elderly patients. DESIGN: Controlled study comparing an intervention in a geriatric unit (GI) with usual care in two internal medicine services (UC). SETTING: University hospital in Madrid, Spain. PARTICIPANTS: Five hundred forty-two consecutive patients (170 GI, 372 UC), aged 70 and older, with any of the risk criteria for delirium (cognitive impairment, visual impairment, acute disease severity, dehydration). INTERVENTION: Educational measures and specific actions in seven risk areas (orientation, sensory impairment, sleep, mobilization, hydration, nutrition, drug use). Daily monitoring of adherence. MEASUREMENTS: Baseline characteristics, risk factors for delirium, and quality care indicators were analyzed. The primary endpoint was incidence of delirium assessed daily. The secondary endpoint was functional decline, defined as loss of independence in any of the activities of daily living. The intervention effect was evaluated using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Delirium affected 11.7% of the GI group and 18.5% of the UC group (P=.04). After adjustment for confounders, the intervention was associated with lower incidence of delirium (odds ratio=0.4, 95% confidence interval=0.24-0.77; P=.005). In the patients who experienced delirium, severity, length, and recurrence of episodes were similar in both groups. Adherence to the intervention protocols was 75.7%. The intervention reduced the rate of functional decline (45.5% in GI vs 56.3% in UC, P=.03) and improved other quality indicators (e.g., mobilization and physical restraints reduction). CONCLUSION: A multicomponent, nonpharmacological intervention integrated into routine practice reduces delirium during hospitalization in older patients, improves quality of care, and can be implemented without additional resources in a public healthcare system.
Asunto(s)
Delirio/prevención & control , Hospitalización , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , APACHE , Actividades Cotidianas/clasificación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Terapia Combinada , Conducta Cooperativa , Estudios Transversales , Delirio/epidemiología , Delirio/enfermería , Delirio/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Capacitación en Servicio , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Masculino , Escala del Estado Mental , Factores de Riesgo , EspañaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether an early multidisciplinary geriatric intervention in elderly patients with hip fracture reduced length of stay, morbidity, and mortality and improved functional evolution. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled intervention trial. SETTING: Orthopedic ward in a university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred nineteen patients aged 65 and older hospitalized for hip fracture surgery. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomly assigned to a daily multidisciplinary geriatric intervention (n=155) or usual care (n=164) during hospitalization in the acute phase of hip fracture. MEASUREMENTS: Primary endpoints were in-hospital length of stay and incidence of death or major medical complications. Secondary endpoints were the rate of recovery of previous activities of daily living and ambulation ability at 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: Median length of stay was 16 days in the geriatric intervention group and 18 days in the usual care group (P=.06). Patients assigned to the geriatric intervention showed a lower in-hospital mortality (0.6% vs 5.8%, P=.03) and major medical complications rate (45.2% vs 61.7%, P=.003). After adjustment for confounding variables, geriatric intervention was associated with a 45% lower probability of death or major complications (95% confidence interval=7-68%). More patients in the geriatric intervention group achieved a partial recovery at 3 months (57% vs 44%, P=.03), but there were no differences between the groups at 6 and 12 months. CONCLUSION: Early multidisciplinary daily geriatric care reduces in-hospital mortality and medical complications in elderly patients with hip fracture, but there is not a significant effect on length of hospital stay or long-term functional recovery.