RESUMEN
Hospital readmission after lung transplantation negatively affects quality of life and resource utilization. A secondary analysis of data collected prospectively was conducted to identify the pattern of (incidence, count, cumulative duration), reasons for and predictors of readmission for 201 lung transplant recipients (LTRs) assessed at 2, 6, and 12 mo after discharge. The majority of LTRs (83.6%) were readmitted, and 64.2% had multiple readmissions. The median cumulative readmission duration was 19 days. The main reasons for readmission were other than infection or rejection (55.5%), infection only (25.4%), rejection only (9.9%), and infection and rejection (0.7%). LTRs who required reintubation (odds ratio [OR] 1.92; p = 0.008) or were discharged to care facilities (OR 2.78; p = 0.008) were at higher risk for readmission, with a 95.7% cumulative incidence of readmission at 12 mo. Thirty-day readmission (40.8%) was not significantly predicted by baseline characteristics. Predictors of higher readmission count were lower capacity to engage in self-care (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.99; p = 0.03) and discharge to care facilities (IRR 1.45; p = 0.01). Predictors of longer cumulative readmission duration were older age (arithmetic mean ratio [AMR] 1.02; p = 0.009), return to the intensive care unit (AMR 2.00; p = 0.01) and lower capacity to engage in self-care (AMR 0.99; p = 0.03). Identifying LTRs at risk may assist in optimizing predischarge care, discharge planning and long-term follow-up.
Asunto(s)
Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Trasplante de Pulmón/efectos adversos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Calidad de Vida , Autocuidado , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Alta del Paciente , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
In addition to improved functional ability, patients who complete rehabilitation programs typically have positive psychologic changes, including increased motivation and an enhanced quality of life. Potentially, patients with end-stage lung disease awaiting a lung transplant can have similar benefits. However, no studies were identified that examined the impact of an exercise program on quality of life in patients awaiting lung transplantation. This pilot study was an initial step toward evaluating outcomes of a health maintenance program on exercise tolerance and quality of life. Subjects were nine lung transplant candidates who met lung transplant listing criteria and who were randomized to participate in a 6-week health maintenance program consisting of education alone or education plus exercise. Subjects completed cardiopulmonary exercise testing, a 6-minute walk, and the Quality of Well-being scale, Quality of Life Index, and Symptom Frequency/Symptom Distress scale before and after completion of the program. No significant between-group changes were seen. Quality of Well-being scores (p < 0.005) and 6-minute walk distance (p < 0.03) improved over time in both groups. Findings suggest that patients awaiting lung transplantation perceived improved quality of well-being and increased walk distance after participation in a health maintenance program. Education plus exercise conferred no benefits beyond those achieved by education alone. However, the number of subjects studied was small and duration of follow-up was limited.