RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggests that the tumor stem cells that are responsible for the pathogenesis of gliomas have similar properties to those of neural stem cells. We have studied two of the most consistently expressed stem cell markers in gliomas, i.e., CD133 and Nestin, and compared them with respect to p53 expression and IDH status. OBJECTIVES: To assess the level of expression of Nestin and CD133, and identify a correlation among various grades of diffuse glioma with IDH status and expression of p53. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional retrospective study with 102 subjects for the expression of cancer stem cell markers; CD133 and Nestin and the correlation of their expression with that of p53 and IDH1 status in adult diffuse glioma. The study was conducted in the Departments of Pathology and Neurosurgery. The expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections. The scoring of expression of CD133 and Nestin was adapted from Zhang et al. The scoring for p53 was adopted from Aruna et al. Results: The diffuse gliomas were graded based on WHO into grade II (30.3%), grade III (28.4%), and grade IV (41.3%). Among WHO grade IV, 59.4% were primary, and 40.4% were secondary glioblastomas. 73% of the diffuse gliomas were IDH mutant, and p53 showed an overall expression of 76.4%. The expression of CD133 and Nestin were compared with the increasing grades of diffuse gliomas, which, when plotted on ROC curves, had AUCs of 0.6806 and 0.6119, respectively. Their expression showed a positive correlation with the IDH status of the tumor. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer stem cell markers CD133 and Nestin are expressed in diffuse glioma and have a higher expression with increasing WHO grade of malignancy. These cancer stem cell markers have shown significant association with the IDH-1 mutant status of diffuse gliomas. Hence, it can be inferred that diffuse gliomas with a higher expression of CD133 and Nestin have a poorer prognosis. Further, these cancer stem cell markers may be used as therapeutic targets in the future.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) reporting system for pancreaticobiliary cytopathology was released to internationalize the reporting, assisting in correct diagnosis and patient treatment with significant revisions from the previous Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) system. The "neoplastic: benign" and "neoplastic: other" categories have mostly been superseded by two new ones: "pancreatic neoplasia-low-grade" (PaN-low) and "pancreatic neoplasia-high-grade" (PaN-high), which classify intermediate neoplastic lesions based on cytological atypia. We aim to assess the reproducibility and risk of malignancy (ROM) for reporting pancreaticobiliary cytopathology by the WHO system in comparison with the PSC system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study by reviewing archival slides sent for pancreaticobiliary cytological evaluation from June 2021 to June 2023, by two pathologists blinded to each other's findings. Absolute ROM was determined by histopathology/cell block study/clinical follow-up (minimum 6 months)/overtly malignant imaging/metastasis. RESULTS: A total of 332 cases from 329 patients met the inclusion criteria, comprising pancreatic, gallbladder, and biliary lesions. The median patient age was 54 years (range, 14-86 years). The overall sensitivity of the test is 74.9% specificity is 93.2%, positive predictive value of 96.8%, negative predictive value of 57.6%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 81.8%. The absolute ROM for each site in all categories was comparable with that of the published data from the WHO system. CONCLUSION: Our study highlights the reliability of the WHO system for guiding clinical decision-making and patient management in the context of pancreaticobiliary. However, continual efforts among pathologists are essential to maintain consistent accuracy in cytological interpretations.
RESUMEN
Multiple primary synchronous tumours have always created an inquisitiveness among clinicians, radiologists and pathologists. The diagnosis invariably proposes a challenge to diagnosticians. The coexistence of a primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is exceedingly rare, with countable number of cases being reported in literature. We report a pioneer case of 75-year-old male, having chronic hepatitis B, diagnosed with synchronous primary RCC and HCC in by fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and confirmed by immunohistochemistry.