RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: While being prepared for abortions, some women experience decisional ambivalence during their encounters with health personnel at the hospital. Women's experiences with these encounters have rarely been examined. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to explore ambivalent abortion-seeking women's experiences of their encounters with health personnel. RESEARCH DESIGN: The data were collected in individual interviews and analysed with dialogical narrative analyses. PARTICIPANTS AND RESEARCH CONTEXT: A total of 13 women (aged 18-36 years), who were uncertain of whether to terminate their pregnancies during the first trimester, were interviewed before and after they made their decisions. The participants were recruited at six Norwegian outpatient clinics. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS: Approval was granted by the Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics. FINDINGS: The ambivalent pregnant women sought to make autonomous decisions while simultaneously involving their closest confidants and health personnel in the process. The following three types of narratives of women's experiences with encounters with health personnel were identified: the respected women; the identified women; and the abandoned women. DISCUSSION: The findings are discussed in terms of the ambivalent pregnant woman's autonomous responsibility in considering an abortion and how her autonomy can be enabled or impaired during encounters with health personnel. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATION: Although the women considered themselves autonomous and responsible for their final decisions, they wished health personnel were involved in their situations. The health personnel contributed by enabling or disabling the possibility of decision-making in accordance with the women's values. The findings indicate that health personnel who care for women considering abortions must be trained in dialogical competence.
Asunto(s)
Solicitantes de Aborto/psicología , Pacientes/psicología , Autonomía Personal , Solicitantes de Aborto/estadística & datos numéricos , Aborto Inducido/métodos , Aborto Inducido/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Noruega , Pacientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo , IncertidumbreRESUMEN
Abortion during the first trimester is legal in most Western countries. However, deciding to terminate a pregnancy is a challenging process, and some women arrive at the abortion clinic still not absolutely certain. We explored the experiences of 13 pregnant Norwegian women struggling to finalize their decision, interviewing them before and after their decision. Verification of the pregnancy meant a new reality for the women. They started to consider their readiness, describing the experience as a lonely journey during which their values were challenged. A feeling of existential loneliness dominated the decision-making process and the implementation.
Asunto(s)
Aborto Inducido/psicología , Toma de Decisiones , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo/psicología , Embarazo no Deseado/psicología , Mujeres Embarazadas/psicología , Incertidumbre , Salud de la Mujer , Adulto , Afecto , Conducta de Elección , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Noruega , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Investigación Cualitativa , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
In this article we elaborate on how living in a changed female body after gynecological cancer is experienced 5 to 6 years after treatment. Based on a phenomenological life-world perspective, 32 interviews with 16 women showed that changes involved dealing with unfamiliarity related to experiences of bodily emptiness, temperature fluctuations, sex-life consequences, vulnerability, and uncertainty. Findings are discussed in relation to Svenaeus's perspective on illness as an unhomelike being-in-the-body and being-in-the-world. This perspective could spur health personnel to improve patient information and dialogue and thus facilitate a process leading to more familiarity and homelikeness for patients during treatment and follow-up.