RESUMEN
In vertebrate vision, early retinal circuits divide incoming visual information into functionally opposite elementary signals: On and Off, transient and sustained, chromatic and achromatic. Together these signals can yield an efficient representation of the scene for transmission to the brain via the optic nerve. However, this long-standing interpretation of retinal function is based on mammals, and it is unclear whether this functional arrangement is common to all vertebrates. Here we show that male poultry chicks use a fundamentally different strategy to communicate information from the eye to the brain. Rather than using functionally opposite pairs of retinal output channels, chicks encode the polarity, timing, and spectral composition of visual stimuli in a highly correlated manner: fast achromatic information is encoded by Off-circuits, and slow chromatic information overwhelmingly by On-circuits. Moreover, most retinal output channels combine On- and Off-circuits to simultaneously encode, or multiplex, both achromatic and chromatic information. Our results from birds conform to evidence from fish, amphibians, and reptiles which retain the full ancestral complement of four spectral types of cone photoreceptors.
Asunto(s)
Pollos , Retina , Masculino , Animales , Células Fotorreceptoras Retinianas Conos , Encéfalo , Excipientes , MamíferosRESUMEN
Visual perception scales with changes in the visual stimulus, or contrast, irrespective of background illumination. However, visual perception is challenged when adaptation is not fast enough to deal with sudden declines in overall illumination, for example, when gaze follows a moving object from bright sunlight into a shaded area. Here, we show that the visual system of the fly employs a solution by propagating a corrective luminance-sensitive signal. We use in vivo 2-photon imaging and behavioral analyses to demonstrate that distinct OFF-pathway inputs encode contrast and luminance. Predictions of contrast-sensitive neuronal responses show that contrast information alone cannot explain behavioral responses in sudden dim light. The luminance-sensitive pathway via the L3 neuron is required for visual processing in such rapidly changing light conditions, ensuring contrast constancy when pure contrast sensitivity underestimates a stimulus. Thus, retaining a peripheral feature, luminance, in visual processing is required for robust behavioral responses.
Asunto(s)
Drosophila melanogaster/fisiología , Percepción Visual/fisiología , Animales , Sensibilidad de Contraste/fisiología , Reconocimiento Visual de Modelos/fisiología , Estimulación LuminosaRESUMEN
Insects with ears process sounds and respond to conspecific signals or predator cues. Axons of auditory sensory cells terminate in mechanosensory neuropils from which auditory interneurons project into (brain-) areas to prepare response behaviors. In the prothoracic ganglion of a bush-cricket, a cluster of local DUM (dorsal unpaired median) neurons has recently been described and constitutes a filter bank for carrier frequency. Here, we demonstrate that these neurons also constitute a filter bank for temporal patterns. The majority of DUM neurons showed pronounced phasic-tonic responses. The transitions from phasic to tonic activation had different time constants in different DUM neurons. Time constants of the membrane potential were shorter in most DUM neurons than in auditory sensory neurons. Patterned stimuli with known behavioral relevance evoked a broad range of responses in DUM neurons: low-pass, band-pass, and high-pass characteristics were encountered. Temporal and carrier frequency processing were not correlated. Those DUM neurons producing action potentials showed divergent processing of temporal patterns when the graded potential or the spiking was analyzed separately. The extent of membrane potential fluctuations mimicking the patterned stimuli was different between otherwise similarly responding neurons. Different kinds of inhibition were apparent and their relevance for temporal processing is discussed.
Asunto(s)
Percepción Auditiva/fisiología , Gryllidae/fisiología , Interneuronas/fisiología , Animales , Vías Auditivas/fisiología , Femenino , Ganglios de Invertebrados/citología , Ganglios de Invertebrados/fisiología , Audición/fisiología , MasculinoRESUMEN
In bush-crickets the first stage of central auditory processing occurs in the prothoracic ganglion. About 15 to 50 different auditory dorsal unpaired median neurons (DUM neurons) exist but they have not been studied in any detail. These DUM neurons may be classified into seven different morphological types, although, there is only limited correlation between morphology and physiological responses. Ninety seven percent of the stained neurons were local, 3% were intersegmental. About 90% project nearly exclusively into the auditory neuropile, and 45% into restricted areas therein. Lateral extensions overlap with the axons of primary auditory sensory neurons close to their branching point. DUM neurons are typically tuned to frequencies covering the range between 2 and 50 kHz and thereby may establish a filter bank for carrier frequency. Less than 10% of DUM neurons have their branches in adjacent and more posterior regions of the auditory neuropile and are mostly tuned to low frequencies, less sensitive than the other types and respond to vibration. Thirty five percent of DUM show indications of inhibition, either through reduced responses at higher intensities, or by hyperpolarizing responses to sound. Most DUM neurons produce phasic spike responses preferably at higher intensities. Spikes may be elicited by intracellular current injection. Preliminary data suggest that auditory DUM neurons have GABA as transmitter and therefore may inhibit other auditory interneurons. From all known local auditory neurons, only DUM neurons have frequency specific responses which appear suited for local processing relevant for acoustic communication in bush crickets.
Asunto(s)
Vías Auditivas/fisiología , Ganglios de Invertebrados/citología , Gryllidae/anatomía & histología , Neuronas/fisiología , Estimulación Acústica , Potenciales de Acción/fisiología , Animales , Femenino , Audición , Masculino , Neurópilo/fisiología , Orientación/fisiología , Ácido gamma-Aminobutírico/metabolismoRESUMEN
The performance of vertebrate ears is controlled by auditory efferents that originate in the brain and innervate the ear, synapsing onto hair cell somata and auditory afferent fibers [1-3]. Efferent activity can provide protection from noise and facilitate the detection and discrimination of sound by modulating mechanical amplification by hair cells and transmitter release as well as auditory afferent action potential firing [1-3]. Insect auditory organs are thought to lack efferent control [4-7], but when we inspected mosquito ears, we obtained evidence for its existence. Antibodies against synaptic proteins recognized rows of bouton-like puncta running along the dendrites and axons of mosquito auditory sensory neurons. Electron microscopy identified synaptic and non-synaptic sites of vesicle release, and some of the innervating fibers co-labeled with somata in the CNS. Octopamine, GABA, and serotonin were identified as efferent neurotransmitters or neuromodulators that affect auditory frequency tuning, mechanical amplification, and sound-evoked potentials. Mosquito brains thus modulate mosquito ears, extending the use of auditory efferent systems from vertebrates to invertebrates and adding new levels of complexity to mosquito sound detection and communication.