RESUMEN
Delleman syndrome is a rare congenital disorder. We report an 8-month old female with a history of a fleshy mass covering the left eye since birth. Examination revealed poor vision in the left eye, an upper lid coloboma and an epibulbar dermoid with a large area of alopecia and scalp hypoplasia involving the left frontoparietal region. Transfontanelle ultrasound scan did not reveal any intracranial cyst. Cranial computerised tomography subsequently revealed characteristic cerebral malformations of Delleman syndrome. This report demonstrates clinical and computed tomographic features of a case of Delleman syndrome with emphasis on the usefulness of transfontanelle ultrasonography in assessing for life-threatening intracerebral cysts or hydrocephalus, particularly in resource-limited settings, where neuroimaging is not readily available or affordable.
Asunto(s)
Quistes del Sistema Nervioso Central/diagnóstico por imagen , Anomalías del Ojo/diagnóstico por imagen , Párpados/diagnóstico por imagen , Dedos/anomalías , Anomalías Cutáneas/diagnóstico por imagen , Quistes del Sistema Nervioso Central/congénito , Anomalías del Ojo/complicaciones , Párpados/anomalías , Femenino , Dedos/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Lactante , Nigeria , Enfermedades Orbitales/diagnóstico , Anomalías Cutáneas/complicaciones , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
Uncorrected presbyopia is a major cause of poor near vision in the developing countries. To determine the prevalence and demographic characteristics of presbyopia among adult populations (40 years and above) in a sub-urban population, southwest Nigeria, a population-based cross-sectional study was carried out from April to May 2014. A multi-stage sampling method was used to select eligible respondents. All participants had distance visual acuity assessment done and participants with visual acuity of less than 6/6 were refracted. Near vision was then assessed at 40 cm with distance correction in place if required. Information on near vision was obtained from the participants using interviewer administered questionnaires. Data collected were analysed using SPSS version 22. A total of 440 subjects aged 40 years and above were studied. Prevalence of presbyopia was 75 % and was significantly associated with increasing age. There was higher prevalence of presbyopia among females than males (76.3 % vs. 73.5 %), though not statistically significant. Also prevalence of presbyopia was not significantly associated with educational and occupational status in the study. This study demonstrated a high prevalence of presbyopia. There is need for improved awareness on presbyopia screening and available correction in the local government.
Asunto(s)
Presbiopía/epidemiología , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Escolaridad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nigeria/epidemiología , Ocupaciones/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Distribución por Sexo , Población Urbana/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
The purpose of this study was to compare patient comfort and preference between the use of Icare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer for the measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP). This was a prospective study carried out at the Eye clinic of the University College Hospital, Ibadan on volunteers aged 18 years and above. Demographic information of the participants was collected using a proforma. All participants had Icare tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) performed on them in sequence within a 15-min period. After the measurements, participants were asked to report their assessment of the level of comfort with each method and to state their preferred choice for IOP measurement. One hundred subjects participated in the study; 45 (45 %) were males, and the mean age was 47.1 (± 17.4) years. Forty-three subjects (43 %) reported that Icare was either much more comfortable or more comfortable than GAT, while 31 (31 %) stated that Goldmann applanation was either much more or more comfortable. Twenty-six participants (26 %) reported that the level of comfort was the same with the two instruments. With regard to which of the instruments will be preferred for IOP check at another clinic visit, 53 (53 %) of the respondents preferred the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Some of the participants preferred GAT because they believed it was more sophisticated, while the main reported reason for preferring Icare was the stinging sensation of the anesthetic eye drop when using GAT. Although more participants reported the Icare tonometer to be more comfortable, the Goldmann tonometer was preferred by majority of the respondents.