Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39207597

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Around the world, the COVID-19 pandemic has presented many difficulties, and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has become a major worry. The antiviral and anti-inflammatory characteristics of methylene blue (MB) have garnered interest for potential medicinal applications. The object of the current study is to assess the effect of orally administered MB on the treatment of ARDS associated with COVID-19. METHOD: A randomized clinical study was carried out on 122 hospitalized patients who had ARDS related to COVID-19. Patients who met the eligibility requirements were randomized at random to either the control group (CG) (n = 60) or the intervention group (IG) (n = 62). Standard treatments were administered to both groups, with the addition of oral MB to the IG. Clinical outcomes, including SpO2 levels, CRP levels were assessed on the third and fifth days. Additionally, at the time of discharge, patients' assessments were made in terms of APACHE II scores, SOFA scores, LDH and CRP levels, SpO2, and respiratory rate in comparison to the day prior to the intervention. Patients were followed for mortality outcomes at one month and three months after the intervention. RESULTS: Significant changes were observed in SpO2 levels over time (P < 0.001) and between groups (P = 0.022), with higher levels in the MB-treated group. The interaction between time and group (P = 0.019) indicated a stronger increase in SpO2 in the IG, with the IG's SpO2 level increasing by 6.42%. Furthermore, CRP levels showed significant changes over time (P < 0.001), but not between groups (P = 0.092). However, the interaction between group and CRP change over time (P = 0.019) suggested a distinct pattern of CRP decrease in the IG. Significant improvement in RR, SpO2, CRP, and APACHE II score were found according to discharge results. However, in terms of SpO2 and the APACHE II score, this improvement was noteworthy for IG. The length of hospitalization and mortality rates at one- and three-month follow-ups did not differ significantly. CONCLUSION: Oral administration of MB demonstrated positive effects on improving SpO2 levels and reducing inflammatory markers in COVID-19-related ARDS patients. Despite no significant impact on survival rates or hospitalization length, the study supports the potential efficacy of MB as an alternative treatment for COVID-19 ARDS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered with the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials ( http://www.irct.ir ) under the registration code IRCT20200409047007N2 on 11/29/2021.

2.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38095650

RESUMEN

Cardiotoxicity caused by anthracyclines chemotherapy is one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity in cancer survivors. Continuous infusion (CI) instead of bolus (BOL) injection is one of the methods that seem to be effective in reducing doxorubicin (DOX) cardiotoxicity. Due to the variety of results, we decided to compare these two approaches regarding toxicity and efficacy and report the final results for different cancers. We included 21 studies (four preclinical and seventeen clinical trials) up to May 15, 2023. In children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and adults with chronic lymphoblastic leukemia (CLL) and gastric cancer, results were in favor of BOL injection, without increase in cardiotoxicity. On the other hand, CI showed to be better option in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and breast cancer. Various results were also observed in adult patients with sarcoma. Overall, it can be concluded that the benefits of CI, especially in adults, outweigh its disadvantages. However, due to the variety of results and heterogeneity of studies, further clinical trials with a larger sample size and a longer duration of follow-up are needed to make a more accurate comparison between CI and BOL injection.

3.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38095652

RESUMEN

The development of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) is a serious complication in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who undergo an induction to remission chemotherapy. Given the increased mortality in AML patients with IFI despite prophylaxis, we need to address this problem. Statins have traditionally been employed in clinical settings as agents for reducing lipid levels. Nonetheless, recent investigations have brought to light their antifungal properties in animals, as well as in vitro studies. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of atorvastatin when added to the routine IFI prophylaxis regimen in patients diagnosed with AML. A randomized, multicenter, triple-blind study was conducted on 76 AML patients aged 18-70, who received either placebo or atorvastatin in addition to fluconazole. Patients were followed for 30 days in case of developing IFIs, patient survival, and atorvastatin- related adverse drug reactions. Data were analyzed with SPSS version 26.0. A level of significance of 0.05 was utilized as the threshold for all statistical tests. The data were analyzed by adjusting for the effect of age, regarding that there was a significant difference between the two groups, and showed that atorvastatin reduced the development of both probable and proven IFI (based on EORTC/MSGERC criteria) compared to placebo. IFI-free survival was also significantly better in the atorvastatin group. The incidence of developing aspergillosis did not differ between the two groups. No serious adverse events related to atorvastatin were observed. The present investigation has substantiated the antecedent in vitro and animal research on the fungicidal impact of statins and has suggested the need for additional research involving larger sample sizes and an extended duration of follow-up. Trial registration: This study was registered on the Iranian registry of clinical trials as IRCT20210503051166N1 (Date of confirmation 2021.05.03).

4.
Int Immunopharmacol ; 112: 109227, 2022 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36099787

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Changes in the incidence of bleomycin pulmonary toxicity (BPT) as a result of adding colony-stimulating factors (CSF) to bleomycin regimens has been investigated in numerous studies. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the outcomes of these studies. METHODS: A systematic search was performed using Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase on April 2021. Studies evaluating the incidence of BPT in patients receiving bleomycin with and without CSF were included. In addition, meta-analysis was performed by pooling odds ratios using R. RESULTS: Out of 340 obtained records, our qualitative and quantitative analysis included 3234 and 1956 patients from 22 and 14 studies, respectively. The quantitative synthesis showed that addition of CSF significantly increased the risk of BPT incidence (OR = 1.82, 95 % CI: 1.37-2.40, p < 0.0001; I2 = 10.7 %). Subgroup analysis did not show any association between continent, bleomycin dose, cancer type, type of study, and pulmonary function test with BPT incidence. CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis showed that co-administration of CSF with bleomycin increases the incidence of BPT. The physicians need to consider this finding while deciding the best strategy for this cohort of patients.


Asunto(s)
Bleomicina , Factores Estimulantes de Colonias , Enfermedades Pulmonares , Humanos , Bleomicina/efectos adversos , Estudios de Cohortes , Factores Estimulantes de Colonias/efectos adversos , Incidencia , Enfermedades Pulmonares/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades Pulmonares/epidemiología
5.
J Family Med Prim Care ; 11(5): 1949-1956, 2022 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35800586

RESUMEN

Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a pulmonary involvement which was reported for the first time in December 2019 in the city of Wuhan, Hubei province, China. The aim of the study was to describe the demographic, clinical, laboratory, and radiological characteristics of 204 definitive laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients hospitalized in Mashhad, Khorasan Razavi province, Iran. Patients and Methods: This study was performed on 204 laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients. A set of laboratory tests combined with various patient information and results from lung high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) were gathered in a checklist and analyzed to give us a better view of patients who are hospitalized due to the complications caused by this disease. Results: The average age of our patients was 58.83 ± 15.93 years. There were 122 (59.8%) male and 82 (40.2%) female patients, and almost all of our patients had at least one underlying disease. Nine (4.4%) of our patients reported having gone for a trip to COVID-19-epidemic areas in the last 2 weeks. The most common signs shared among all our patients were cough, fever, and decreased O2 saturation; the average respiratory rate was 25.50 ± 6.74/min, average axillary body temperature was 37.69°C ± 0.69°C, and average O2 saturation was 88.34% ± 7.34%. Conclusion: Based on our results, the most common signs of this disease are fever, cough, and shortness of breath, similar to seasonal influenza. Our data on disease severity showed that 33 (16.2%) patients had moderate disease, 139 (68.1%) had severe disease, and 28 (13.7%) were critical; 22 (10.8%) of our hospitalized patients died due to the complications of this disease.

6.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 8731, 2021 04 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33888747

RESUMEN

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can present with a variety of symptoms. Severity of the disease may be associated with several factors. Here, we review clinical features of COVID-19 inpatients with different severities. This cross-sectional study was performed in Imam Reza hospital, Mashhad, Iran, during February-April 2020. COVID-19 patients with typical computed tomography (CT) patterns and/or positive reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) were included. The patients were classified into three groups of moderate, severe, and critical based on disease severity. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and radiologic findings were collected and compared. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Overall, 200 patients with mean age of 69.75 ± 6.39 years, of whom 82 (41%) were female were studied. Disease was severe/critical in the majority of patients (167, 83.5%). Disease severity was significantly associated with age, malignant comorbidities, dyspnea, nausea/vomiting, confusion, respiratory rate, pulse rate, O2 saturation, extent of CT involvement, serum C-reactive protein (CRP), pH, pO2, and aspartate transaminase (P < 0.05). Moreover, complications including shock, coagulopathy, acidosis, sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and intubation were significantly higher in patients with higher severities (P < 0.05). O2 saturation, nausea/vomiting, and extent of lung CT involvement were independent predictors of severe/critical COVID-19 (OR 0.342, 45.93, and 25.48, respectively; P < 0.05). Our results indicate O2 saturation, nausea/vomiting, and extent of lung CT involvement as independent predictors of severe COVID-19 conditions. Serum CRP levels and pO2 were also considerably higher patients with higher severity and can be used along with other factors to predict severe disease in COVID-19 patients.


Asunto(s)
Proteína C-Reactiva/metabolismo , COVID-19/diagnóstico por imagen , COVID-19/epidemiología , Factores de Edad , Anciano , COVID-19/patología , Comorbilidad , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Irán , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
7.
Int Immunopharmacol ; 93: 107239, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33582019

RESUMEN

Since SARS-CoV-2 infection is rapidly spreading all around the world, affecting many people and exhausting health care resources, therapeutic options must be quickly investigated in order to develop a safe and effective treatment. The present study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of convalescent plasma (CP) for treating severe cases of COVID-19 who developed acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Among 64 confirmed cases of severe COVID-19 with ARDS in this study, 32 patients received CP besides first line treatment. Their clinical response and outcome in regard to disease severity and mortality rate were evaluated and compared with the other 32 patients in the control group who were historically matched while randomly chosen from previous patients with the same conditions except for receiving CP therapy. Analysis of the data was performed using SPSS software. Patients with plasma therapy showed improvements in their clinical outcomes including a reduction in disease severity in terms of SOFA and APACHE II scores, the length of ICU stay, need for noninvasive ventilation and intubation and also showed an increase in oxygenation. They also showed reduction in mortality which was statistically significant in less severe cases with mild or moderate ARDS. Early administration of the convalescent plasma could successfully contribute to the treatment of severe COVID-19 patients with mild or moderate ARDS at risk of progressing to critical state.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/terapia , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/inmunología , COVID-19/virología , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunización Pasiva/efectos adversos , Inmunización Pasiva/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/inmunología , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/virología , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven , Sueroterapia para COVID-19
8.
Clin Case Rep ; 8(12): 3208-3212, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33363908

RESUMEN

Leishmaniasis is a rare complication in adult cases even in endemic areas. Here, the first report of visceral leishmaniasis in a young woman in northeast of Iran has been described.

9.
Trials ; 21(1): 575, 2020 Jun 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32586363

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: In this study, we investigate the effect of hydroxychloroquine on the prevention of Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) in cancer patients being treated. TRIAL DESIGN: This is a multi-centre, two-arm, parallel-group, triple-blind, phase 2-3 randomised controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS: All patients over the age of 15 from 5 types of cancer are included in the study. Patients with acute lymphoid and myeloid leukemias in the first line treated with curative intent, patients with high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with leukemia protocols and patients with non-metastatic breast and colon cancer in the first line of treatment will enter the study. The exclusion criteria will include known sensitivity to Hydroxychloroquine, weight below 35 kilograms, history of retinopathy, history of any cardiac disease, acute respiratory tract infection in the last 2 months, having COVID-19 in the first two weeks of entering the trial, having Diabetes Mellitus, having an immuno-suppressive disease other than cancer, having chronic pulmonary disease and taking immuno-suppressant drug other than chemotherapeutic agents for current cancer. This study is performed in five academic centres affiliated to Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. INTERVENTION AND COMPARATOR: Patients are randomly assigned to two groups; one being given hydroxychloroquine and the other is given placebo. During two months of treatment, the two groups are treated with either hydroxychloroquine (Amin® Pharmaceutical Company, Isfahan, Iran) or placebo (identical in terms of shape, colour, smell) as a single 200 mg tablet every other day. Patients will be monitored for COVID-19 symptoms during the follow-up period. If signs or symptoms occur (fever, cough, shortness of breath), they will be examined and investigated with a high-resolution computed tomography (CT) scan of the lungs, COVID-19 specific IgM, IgG antibody assay and a nucleic acid amplification test (NAT) for the SARS-CoV-2 virus. MAIN OUTCOMES: The primary end point of this study is to investigate the incidence of COVID-19 in patients being treated for their cancer over a 2-month period. RANDOMISATION: Randomisation will be performed using randomly permuted blocks. By using an online website (www.randomization.com) the randomization sequence will be produced by quadruple blocks. The allocation ratio in intervention and control groups is 1:1. BLINDING (MASKING): Participants and caregivers do not know whether the patient is in the intervention or the control group. The outcome assessor and the data analyst are also blinded to group assignment. NUMBERS TO BE RANDOMISED (SAMPLE SIZE): The calculated total sample size is 60 patients, with 30 patients in each group. TRIAL STATUS: The trial began on April 14, 2020 and recruitment is ongoing. Recruitment is anticipated to be completed by June 14, 2020 There has been no change in study protocol since approval, protocol version 1 was approved April 12, 2020. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial has been registered by the title of "Effect of Hydroxychloroquine on Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) prevention in cancer patients under treatment" in Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) with code "IRCT20200405046958N1", https://www.irct.ir/trial/46946. Registration date is April 14, 2020. FULL PROTOCOL: The full protocol is attached as an additional file, accessible from the Trials website (Additional file 1). In the interest in expediting dissemination of this material, the familiar formatting has been eliminated; this Letter serves as a summary of the key elements of the full protocol.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , COVID-19 , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/terapia , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto Joven
10.
Ocul Immunol Inflamm ; 28(5): 739-744, 2020 Jul 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32569494

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate ocular findings in patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the Northeast of Iran. METHODS: In a cross-sectional, observational study all consecutive patients with confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis at the central referral center of these patients in northeast of Iran were included. Ocular examinations (external and slit) were randomly performed for the patients who were admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and six COVID wards of the hospital. Moreover, Chart records and serum chemistry results were collected. RESULTS: A total of 142 patients with the mean age of 62.6 ± 15 years (range: 23-96 years) and almost equal gender distribution (male: N = 77, 54.2%) were included in the study. During the initial external examination by the ophthalmologist, 44 (31%) patients were found to have conjunctival hyperemia and 22 (15.5%) patients had chemosis. Consecutive slit examination showed 41 (28.9%) conjunctival hyperemia, 22 (15.5%) chemosis, 11 (7.7%) cataract, and 9 (6.3%) diabetic retinopathy. The patients with at least one ocular manifestation had significantly higher blood urea levels at the time of admission compared to those with no obvious ocular involvement (median: 41.5, IQR: 28-66.3 vs. median: 33, IQR: 23.8-51.8, P = .023). Moreover, a significant difference was observed in the total white blood cell count, lymphocyte percent, neutrophil count, Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), and blood urea level between patients with positive and negative Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) for SARS-CoV-2 virus. None of the patients reported ocular symptoms prior to systemic involvement. The proportion of patients with at least one ocular manifestation was significantly higher in those admitted in the ICU compared to the non-ICU wards. wards. While conjunctival hyperemia was the most prevalent ocular finding in all patients, chemosis was the most common ocular manifestation in ICU admitted patients. CONCLUSION: Ocular manifestation was observed in more than half of our COVID-19 patients. Hence, it seems important to involve ophthalmologist in the diagnosis and management of these patients.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus/patogenicidad , Conjuntivitis Viral/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones Virales del Ojo/diagnóstico , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , COVID-19 , Conjuntivitis Viral/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Infecciones Virales del Ojo/epidemiología , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Hiperemia/diagnóstico , Hiperemia/epidemiología , Irán/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Microscopía con Lámpara de Hendidura , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA