RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke with large artery occlusion has become the standard of care. However, the question if a subgroup of patients, with a low cerebral blood volume Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score (CBV-ASPECTS) ≤ 7 should be excluded from endovascular treatment remains open. Therefore; we investigated the difference of outcome between patients who were treated by endovascular treatment vs patients who did not receive endovascular treatment. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed our stroke database for all patients who presented within six hours of onset with unfavourable imaging findings and who received endovascular treatment or best medical treatment alone. Unfavourable imaging was defined as a CBV-ASPECTS ≤ 7, which was an exclusion criterion for endovascular treatment at our institution before 2015. RESULTS: From 60 patients with an initial CBV-ASPECTS ≤ 7, 40 received best medical treatment and 20 were treated with endovascular treatment. Arterial hypertension and atrial fibrillation was more present in patients without endovascular treatment, the other baseline characteristics and percentage of patients treated with intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator were not significantly different in both groups. At discharge, 40% of the interventional treated patients had a favourable outcome (eight of 20 (40%) vs six of 40 (15%; p = 0.031). The median values of the National Institute of Health Stroke Score and modified Rankin Scale at discharge were significantly lower in the treated cohort (6.5 (2.5-10.5) vs 16 (9.5-22.5); p = 0.006; 3 (0-5.5) vs 5 (4.5-5.5); p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Patients with a CBV-ASPECTS ≤ 7 are likely to benefit from therapy and therefore may not be excluded from endovascular treatment. Further randomised trials are warranted to validate the data.
Asunto(s)
Trombolisis Mecánica/métodos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Angiografía Cerebral/métodos , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada/métodos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Tomografía Computarizada Multidetector/métodos , Selección de Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: One-stop management of mechanical thrombectomy-eligible patients with large-vessel occlusion represents an innovative approach in acute stroke treatment. This approach reduces door-to-reperfusion times by omitting multidetector CT, using flat detector CT as pre-mechanical thrombectomy imaging. The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of the latest-generation flat detector CT with multidetector CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospectively derived data from patients with ischemic stroke with large-vessel occlusion and mechanical thrombectomy were analyzed in this monocentric study. All included patients underwent multidetector CT before referral to our comprehensive stroke center and flat detector CT in the angiography suite before mechanical thrombectomy. Diagnosis of early ischemic signs, quantified by the ASPECTS, was compared between modalities using cross tables, the Pearson correlation, and Bland-Altman plots. The predictive value of multidetector CT- and flat detector CT-derived ASPECTS for functional outcome was investigated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: Of 25 patients, 24 (96%) had flat detector CT with sufficient diagnostic quality. Median multidetector CT and flat detector CT ASPECTSs were 7 (interquartile range, 5.5-9 and 4.25-8, respectively) with a mean period of 143.6 ± 49.5 minutes between both modalities. The overall sensitivity was 85.1% and specificity was 83.1% for flat detector CT ASPECTS compared with multidetector CT ASPECTS as the reference technique. Multidetector CT and flat detector CT ASPECTS were strongly correlated (r = 0.849, P < .001) and moderately predicted functional outcome (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.738; P = .007 and .715; P = .069, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Determination of ASPECTS on flat detector CT is feasible, showing no significant difference compared with multidetector CT ASPECTS and a similar predictive value for functional outcome. Our findings support the use of flat detector CT for emergency stroke imaging before mechanical thrombectomy to reduce door-to-groin time.