RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are associated with similar patient disease burdens and a high prevalence of comorbid anxiety (ANX), depression (DEP), and fibromyalgia (FM). Nonetheless, these comorbidities are infrequently assessed in routine care, in part because multiple questionnaires are not feasibly completed by patients. We analyzed the prevalence of ANX, DEP, and FM in patients with OA versus patients with RA seen in routine care using indices within a single Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ) and associations with \ Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) and its component function, pain, and patient global scores. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of MDHAQ data in unselected patients with OA or RA receiving routine care at one setting included four indices within an MDHAQ: MDHAQ ANX screen, MDHAQ DEP screen, Fibromyalgia Assessment Screening Tool, and RAPID3. The prevalence of each comorbidity and associations with RAPID3 and components were analyzed in unadjusted and age-adjusted (Mantel-Haenszel) odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Overall, 40.4% of 361 patients with OA and 36.3% of 488 patients with RA screened positive for ANX, DEP, and/or FM (8.1% and 7% for all three, respectively). RAPID3 and each component were elevated significantly in patients with any positive screen result for ANX, DEP, and/or FM in both diagnoses (ORs of 2.6-35.8). CONCLUSION: FM, DEP, and/or ANX rates were 40.4% in patients with OA and 36.3% in patients with RA, associated with significantly poorer patient status measures. Each of these three common comorbidities of patient distress may be feasibly screened for on a single MDHAQ in routine care.

RESUMEN

Objective: To analyse patients with RA for inflammatory activity by physician estimate of global assessment (DOCGL) vs an estimate of inflammatory activity (DOCINF) to explain variation in the swollen joint count (SJC). Methods: Patients with RA were studied at routine care visits. Patients completed a multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ) and the physician completed a 28-joint count for swollen (SJC), tender (TJC) and deformed (DJC) joints and a RheuMetric checklist with a 0-10 DOCGL visual numeric scale (VNS) and 0-10 VNS estimates of inflammation (DOCINF), damage (DOCDAM) and patient distress (DOCSTR). The disease activity score in 28 joints with ESR (DAS28-ESR), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) were calculated. Individual scores and RA indices were compared according to Spearman correlation coefficients and regression analyses. Results: A total of 104 unselected patients were included, with a median age and disease duration of 54.5 and 5 years, respectively. The median DAS28-ESR was 2.9 (Q1-Q3: 2.0-3.7), indicating low activity. DOCINF was correlated significantly with DOCGL (ρ = 0.775). Both DOCGL and DOCINF were correlated significantly with most other measures; correlations with DOCGL were generally higher than with DOCINF other than for SJC. In regression analyses, DOCINF was more explanatory of variation in SJC than DOCGL and other DAS28-ESR components. Conclusions: Variation in SJC is explained more by a 0-10 DOCINF VNS than the traditional DOCGL or any other measure in RA patients seen in routine care. DOCINF on a RheuMetric checklist can provide informative quantitative scores concerning inflammatory activity in RA patients monitored over long periods.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: More than 20% of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients have comorbid fibromyalgia (FM+), which may elevate DAS28-ESR (disease activity score 28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate) and other indices, resulting in challenges to assess inflammatory disease activity. Although several reports indicate that elevated patient global assessment (PATGL) may elevate DAS28 in the absence of inflammatory activity, less information is available concerning the other three components, tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), to possibly elevate DAS28 in FM+ vs. FM- RA patients. METHODS: A PubMed search identified 14 reports which presented comparisons of DAS28-ESR and its four components in RA FM+ vs. FM- groups. Median DAS28, component arithmetic differences, pooled effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals were analysed in the FM+ vs. FM- groups. RESULTS: In FM+ vs. FM- groups, median DAS28 was 5.3 vs. 4.2, SJC 4.0 vs. 3.0, TJC 13.2 vs. 5.3, PATGL 61.6 vs. 39.9, ESR 26.3 vs. 26.5. DAS28-ESR was classified as "high" (>5.1) in 11/14 FM+ groups and "moderate" (3.2-5.1) in all 14 FM- groups. Effect sizes in FM+ vs. FM- groups for DAS28-ESR, SJC, TJC, PATGL, and ESR were large (≥0.8) in 10/14, 1/13, 12/13, 7/13, and 1/13 comparisons, respectively, and pooled effect sizes 0.84 (0.3, 1.4), 0.33 (-0.4, 1.0), 1.27 (0.01, 2.5), 0.91 (-0.6, 2.4), and 0.07 (-0.6, 0.7), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: DAS28-ESR is elevated significantly in FM+ vs. FM- RA patients; pooled effect sizes were highest for TJC, followed by PATGL, SJC and ESR. The findings appear relevant to response and remission criteria, treat-to-target, and general management of RA.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patient global assessment (PATGL) is a component of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthritis (SpA) activity indices, reflecting inflammation in selected clinical trial patients. In routine care, PATGL often may be elevated independently of inflammatory activity by fibromyalgia (FM) and/or depression, leading to complexities in interpretation. A feasible method to screen for FM and/or depression could help to clarify interpretation of high PATGL and index scores, including explanation of apparent limited responses to anti-inflammatory therapies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with RA or SpA in routine care in Barcelona, Chicago, and Sydney complete a 2-page multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ) in 5-10 min. The MDHAQ includes PATGL and three indices, RAPID3 (routine assessment of patient index data) to assess clinical status, FAST4 (0-4 fibromyalgia assessment screening tool) and MDS2 (0-2 MDHAQ depression screen). PATGL was compared for each diagnosis at each site and pooled data in FAST4 positive (+) vs negative (-) and/or MDS2+ vs MDS2- patients using medians and median regressions. RESULTS: Median PATGL was 5.0 in 393 RA and 175 SpA patients; 2.0-3.0 in 305 (58.9%) FAST4-,MDS2- patients, 5.5-6.0 in 71 (13.7%) FAST4-,MDS2+ patients, 7.0-7.5 in 50 (9.7%) FAST4+,MDS2- patients, and 7.0-8.0 in 92 (17.8%) FAST4+,MDS2+ patients. Positive FAST4 and/or MDS2 screens were seen in 41% of patients. Results were similar in RA and SpA at 3 settings on 3 continents. CONCLUSION: Median 0-10 PATGL varied from 2-3/10 to 5.5-8/10, according to negative vs positive screening for FM and/or depression on a single MDHAQ for busy clinical settings.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The study was designed to develop fibromyalgia assessment screening tool (FAST) indices based only on multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ) scores as clues to fibromyalgia (FM), analyzed for possible agreement with the 2011 FM criteria. METHODS: All patients with all diagnoses complete an MDHAQ at each visit in routine care. The MDHAQ includes scores for physical function, pain, global assessment, fatigue, self-report painful joint count, and a 60-symptom checklist. MDHAQ items similar or identical to the 2011 FM criteria symptom severity scale (SSS) and widespread pain index (WPI) components of a polysymptomatic distress scale (PSD) were compiled into continuous MDHAQ-FM-SSS, MDHAQ-FM-WPI, and MDHAQ-FM-PSD indices. Ten candidate MDHAQ scores were analyzed against the 2011 FM criteria using descriptive statistics, Spearman correlations, kappa statistics, and receiver operating characteristic curves for the area under the curve (AUC). MDHAQ candidate variables with the highest AUC were compiled into cumulative MDHAQ-FAST indices of three (FAST3) or four (FAST4) scores. RESULTS: The highest AUCs among MDHAQ scores were seen for symptom checklist, painful joint count, fatigue, and pain, which are included in FAST4; FAST3-F excludes pain, and FAST3-P excludes fatigue. AUCs for FAST3-P, FAST3-F, and FAST4, as well as continuous MDHAQ-FM scores, all were greater than 0.92, indicating excellent criterion validity. Kappa statistics versus the 2011 criteria were 0.63-0.68, higher than 0.41-0.47 versus physician ICD-10 diagnoses. CONCLUSION: Pragmatic FAST3, FAST4, and MDHAQ-FM indices are similar to FM criteria to screen for FM in routine care. It is more feasible to collect the same MDHAQ, which is informative in all rheumatic diseases studied, from each patient than to ask different patients with different diagnoses to complete different questionnaires.

RESUMEN

A patient history generally provides the most important information in diagnosis and management of patients with most rheumatic diseases, including osteoarthritis (OA). Patient history components can be expressed as quantitative, structured, "scientific" data, rather than "subjective" narrative descriptions, using patient self-report questionnaires. The Western Ontario McMaster (WOMAC) questionnaire is used in all OA clinical trials, and the health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) in all rheumatoid arthritis (RA) clinical trials, as "disease-specific" questionnaires. However, both questionnaires include scores for physical function function and pain; physical function scores are correlated highly significantly at r=0.78 in both RA and OA patients, while WOMAC pain scores are correlated with HAQ visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores at r=0.73 in OA and r=0.71 in RA. Therefore, the WOMAC and HAQ may be regarded as largely "generic" questionnaires, at least for people with arthritis. Since it is not feasible to ask patients with different diagnoses to complete different care questionnaires in busy clinical settings, a single multidimensional HAQ (MDHAQ), derived from the HAQ and largely similar and informative in all rheumatic diseases, has been used in all rheumatology patients in several settings. The MDHAQ also has been incorporated into two OA clinical trials, with virtually identical results to the WOMAC. In routine clinical care, MDHAQ scores have documented that the disease burden of OA is comparable to RA in terms of scores for pain, physical function, and RAPID3 (routine assessment of patient index data) an index of pain, function and patient global assessment. Further observations indicate capacity of the MDHAQ to recognise fibromyalgia similarly to formal fibromyalgia criteria, as well as the ineffectiveness of opioids in OA, and similar prevalence of depression and other psychological issues in OA to RA. These findings also illustrate the value of a database of MDHAQ data for retrospective analysis of serendipitous observations from routine clinical care.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Recent studies have suggested that fibromyalgia is inaccurately diagnosed in the community, and that ~75% of persons reporting a physician diagnosis of fibromyalgia would not satisfy published criteria. To investigate possible diagnostic misclassification, we compared expert physician diagnosis with published criteria. METHODS: In a university rheumatology clinic, 497 patients completed the Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MD-HAQ) and the 2010 American College of Rheumatology preliminary diagnostic criteria modified for self-administration during their ordinary medical visits. Patients were evaluated and diagnosed by university rheumatology staff. RESULTS: Of the 497 patients, 121 (24.3%) satisfied the fibromyalgia criteria, while 104 (20.9%) received a clinician International Classification of Diseases (ICD) diagnosis of fibromyalgia. The agreement between clinicians and criteria was 79.2%. However, agreement beyond chance was only fair (κ = 0.41). Physicians failed to identify 60 criteria-positive patients (49.6%) and incorrectly identified 43 criteria-negative patients (11.4%). In a subset of 88 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the kappa value was 0.32, indicating slight to fair agreement. Universally, higher polysymptomatic distress scores and criteria-based diagnosis were associated with more abnormal MD-HAQ clinical scores. Women and patients with more symptoms but fewer pain areas were more likely to receive a clinician's diagnosis than to satisfy fibromyalgia criteria. CONCLUSION: There is considerable disagreement between ICD clinical diagnosis and criteria-based diagnosis of fibromyalgia, calling into question ICD-based studies. Fibromyalgia criteria were easy to use, but problems regarding clinician bias, meaning of a fibromyalgia diagnosis, and the validity of physician diagnosis were substantial.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are a rare group of autoimmune diseases characterized by muscle inflammation. Typically high-dose daily oral corticosteroids are used as the first-line therapy of IIM. Pulse dose intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) has been used for serious or refractory cases. Here, we systematically analyze the therapeutic effect of pulse dose IVMP in patients with IIM in a large municipal safety net medical center and review the literature on pulse IVMP in adult IIM. We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients who were diagnosed with IIM in the rheumatology clinics of the Cook County Health and Hospital Systems. Data collected included patient demographics, diagnosis, immunosuppressive therapies, serial serum creatine kinase (CK) measurements, and serial muscle strength testing. Seven patients received pulse dose IVMP for active myositis. At the time of pulse dose IVMP, the mean strength in the weakest muscle group was rated as 3.1 of 5 (range, 2-4; SD, 0.9) and the mean peak CK was 5746 U/L (range, 1602-14,039; SD, 4911). Dysphagia was reported in 5 of the 7 patients at the time of IVMP. Four to six weeks after IVMP, the mean strength in the weakest muscle group was 3.3 of 5 (range, 1-5; SD, 1.5) and mean peak CK was 1064 U/L (range, 63-1788, SD, 712). Four to six weeks after IVMP, dysphagia had resolved in 2 and improved in 3. At the end of follow-up, mean strength in the weakest muscle group was 4.7 of 5 (range, 4-5; SD, 0.5), mean peak CK was 480 U/L (range, 37-1016; SD, 337), and the mean prednisone dosage was 15 mg (range, 2.5-60; SD, 21). Although our study has certain limitations, our cohort of adult patients with IIM had marked improvement in clinical and biochemical outcomes. Four to six weeks after IVMP infusion, there was a rapid improvement in muscle enzyme levels, muscle strength, and dysphagia. This therapy warrants further controlled trials.

Asunto(s)