RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Clinical and functional impairment after nonoperative treatment of distal biceps ruptures is not well understood. The goal of this study was to measure patients' perceived disability, kinematic adjustment, and forearm supination power after nonoperative treatment of distal biceps ruptures. METHODS: Fourteen individuals after nonoperative treatment of distal biceps ruptures were matched to a control group of 18 uninjured volunteers. Both groups prospectively completed the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE), and Biceps Disability Questionnaire. Both performed a new timed isotonic supination test that was designed to simulate activities of daily life. The isotonic torque dynamometer measures the supination arc, center of supination arc, torque, angular velocity, and power. Motion analysis quantifies forearm and shoulder contributions to the arc of supination. RESULTS: The nonoperative treated group's DASH (23.2 ± 10.3) and SANE (59.6 ± 16.2) scores demonstrated a clinical meaningful impairment. The control group showed no significant differences in kinematic values between dominant and nondominant arms (P = .854). The nonoperative biceps ruptured arms, compared with their uninjured arms, changed supination motion by decreasing the supination arc (P ≤ .036), shifting the center of supination arc to a more pronated position (P ≤ .030), and increasing the shoulder contribution to rotation (P ≤ .001); despite this adaptation, their average corrected power of supination decreased by 47% (P = .001). CONCLUSION: Patients should understand that nonoperative treatment for distal biceps ruptures will result in varying degrees of functional loss as measured by the DASH, SANE, and Biceps Disability Questionnaire, change their supination kinematics during repetitive tasks, and that they will lose 47% of their supination power.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The radial tuberosity contributes to the biceps supination moment arm and the elbow flexion moment. The purpose of our study was to compare the impact of a cortical bone trough versus an anatomic repair on measurements of the forearm supination moment arm and elbow flexion force efficiency. Our hypothesis was that a trough repair would decrease the tuberosity height, the native biceps supination moment arm, and elbow flexion force efficiency compared with an anatomic repair. METHODS: The isometric supination moment arm and elbow flexion force efficiency were measured in ten matched pairs of cadaveric upper limbs. After testing, the geometry of the proximal aspect of the radius was reconstructed with use of stereophotogrammetry. All of the repair sites were three-dimensionally reconstructed to quantify the disturbance of the trough on native anatomy. The tuberosity distance was defined as the distance between the central axis of the radius and the centroid of the respective repair site. RESULTS: Specimens with a trough repair had a 27% lower supination moment arm at 60° of supination (p = 0.036). There were no differences found for pronation or neutral forearm positioning (p > 0.235). Flexion force efficiency was not significantly different between the trough and anatomic repair groups. The average tuberosity distance was 11.0 ± 2.1 mm for the anatomic repairs and 8.3 ± 1.4 mm for the trough repairs (p = 0.003). The percentage of distance lost due to the trough was 25%. Furthermore, the supination moment arm in the supinated position was significantly correlated with the tuberosity distance. CONCLUSIONS: The trough technique resulted in a significant decrease (p = 0.036) in the moment arm of a 60° supinated forearm and a significant reduction (p = 0.003) in radial tuberosity height. The loss of the supination moment arm was correlated with the decrease in tuberosity height, providing evidence that the radial protuberance acts as a mechanical cam. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The anterior protuberance of the radial tuberosity functions as a supination cam; therefore, consideration should be given to preserve its topographical anatomy during a distal biceps repair.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)