Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am Heart J ; 163(3): 438-45, 2012 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22424015

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the 5-year clinical safety and efficacy outcomes of patients treated for in-stent restenosis of bare-metal stents (BMSs). BACKGROUND: The SISR trial is a prospective, randomized trial that compared the safety and efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) vs vascular brachytherapy (VBT) for the treatment of BMS in-stent restenosis. METHODS: A total of 384 patients with BMS in-stent restenosis were randomized to treatment with SES (n = 259) or VBT (n = 125) and were followed for 5 years. RESULTS: At 5 years, the rates of target lesion revascularization (TLR) had narrowed and were nonsignificant between the SES and VBT groups, with TLR rates of 24.7% and 31.2% (95% CI -16.3% to 2.8%, P = .179) respectively. Target vessel failure was 33.6% vs 36.8% (95% CI -13.5% to 6.7% P = .568) for SES compared with VBT. The rate of major adverse cardiac event at 5 years was 34.0% vs 36.8% (95% CI -13.1% to7.1%, P = .648) for the SES compared with VBT. There were no differences between SES and VBT in terms of survival free from TLR (72.9% vs 66.4%, log-rank P = .08) or from target vessel failure (64.4% vs 61.3%, log-rank P = .349). There were no significant differences in the rates of definite/probable stent thrombosis (5.9% vs 2.5%, 95% CI -7.9% to 1.3%, P = .182) between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: At a 5-year follow-up, no differences in safety or efficacy outcomes were observed for treatment of BMS restenosis with SES vs VBT. There were no significant differences in survival free from TLR, target vessel revascularization, or major adverse cardiac events between the 2 groups at 5 years. Sirolimus-eluting stent is a viable treatment option compared with VBT for BMS restenosis.


Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia/métodos , Reestenosis Coronaria/terapia , Vasos Coronarios/efectos de la radiación , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Sirolimus/farmacología , Angiografía Coronaria , Reestenosis Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Vasos Coronarios/efectos de los fármacos , Vasos Coronarios/cirugía , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/farmacología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 1(4): 439-48, 2008 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19463342

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term outcome of patients treated for in-stent restenosis of bare-metal stents (BMS). BACKGROUND: Treatment of restenosis of BMS is characterized by high recurrence rates. Vascular brachytherapy (VBT) improved outcome although late catch-up events were documented. Drug-eluting stents tested against VBT in this setting were found superior for at least the first year; superiority at longer follow-up is uncertain. METHODS: We evaluated 3-year outcome of the multicenter SISR (Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Vascular Brachytherapy for In-Stent Restenosis) trial, which randomized patients with restenosis of BMS to either a sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) or VBT. RESULTS: Target vessel failure (cardiac death, infarction, or target vessel revascularization [TVR]) at 9 months as previously reported was significantly improved with SES. Kaplan-Meier analysis at 3 years documented that survival free from target lesion revascularization (TLR) and TVR continues to be significantly improved with SES: freedom from TLR 81.0% versus 71.6% (log-rank p = 0.018), and TVR 78.2% versus 68.8% (log-rank p = 0.022), SES versus VBT. At 3 years, target vessel failure and major adverse cardiac events (death, infarction, emergency coronary artery bypass grafting, or repeat TLR) remained improved with SES, but did not reach statistical significance. There was no statistically significant difference in definite or probable stent thrombosis (3.5% for SES, 2.4% for VBT; p = 0.758). CONCLUSIONS: At 3 years of follow-up, after treatment of in-stent restenosis of BMS, patients treated with SES have improved survival free of TLR and TVR compared with patients treated with VBT. Stent thrombosis rates are not different between the 2 groups but are higher than reported in trials of treatment of de novo lesions.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/instrumentación , Braquiterapia , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/administración & dosificación , Reestenosis Coronaria/terapia , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Sirolimus/administración & dosificación , Stents , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/efectos adversos , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/mortalidad , Braquiterapia/efectos adversos , Braquiterapia/mortalidad , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Reestenosis Coronaria/etiología , Reestenosis Coronaria/radioterapia , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Metales , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Infarto del Miocardio/prevención & control , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Estudios Prospectivos , Diseño de Prótesis , Recurrencia , Medición de Riesgo , Trombosis/etiología , Trombosis/prevención & control , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA