RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Histopathologic regression following neoadjuvant treatment (NT) of oesophageal cancer is a prognostic factor of survival, but the nodal status is not considered. Here, a score combining both to improve prediction of survival after neoadjuvant therapy is developed. METHODS: Seven hundred and fifteen patients with oesophageal squamous cell (SCC) or adenocarcinoma (AC) undergoing NT and esophagectomy were analysed. Histopathologic response was classified according to percentage of vital residual tumour cells (VRTC): complete response (CR) without VRTC, major response with <10% VRTC, minor response with >10% VRTC. Nodal stage was classified as ypN0 and ypN+. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression were used for survival analysis. RESULTS: Survival analysis identified three groups with significantly different mortality risks: (1) low-risk group for CR (ypT0N0) with 72% 5-year overall survival (5y-OS), (2) intermediate-risk group for minor/major responders and ypN0 with 59% 5y-OS, and (3) high-risk group for minor/major responders and ypN+ with 20% 5y-OS (p < 0.001). Median survival in AC and SCC cohorts were comparable (3.8 (CI 95%: 3.1, 5.3) vs. 4.6 years (CI 95%: 3.3, not reached), p = 0.3). CONCLUSIONS: Histopathologic regression and nodal status should be combined for estimating AC and SCC prognosis. Poor survival in the high-risk group highlights need for adjuvant therapy.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Humanos , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Pronóstico , Terapia Combinada , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Esofagectomía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy (ILE) is the standard surgical care for esophageal cancer patients but postoperative morbidity impairs quality of life and reduces long-term oncological outcome. Two-stage ILE separating the abdominal and thoracic phase into two distinct surgical procedures has proven to enhance microcirculation of the gastric conduit and therefore most likely reduces complications. However, two-stage ILE has not been evaluated systematically in selected groups of patients scheduled for this procedure. This investigation aims to demonstrate the feasibility of two-stage ILE in high-risk patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective analysis of data obtained from a prospective database, a consecutive series of 275 hybrid ILE (hILE) were included. Patients were divided into two groups based on one- or two-stage hILE. Postoperative complications were assessed according to ECCG (Esophageal Complication Consensus Group) criteria and compared using the Clavien-Dindo score. Indication for two-stage esophagectomy was classified as pre- or intraoperative decision. RESULTS: 34 out of 275 patients (12.7%) underwent two-stage hILE. Patients of the two-stage group were significantly older. In 21 of 34 patients (61.8%) the decision for a two-stage procedure was made prior to esophagectomy, in 13 (38.2%) patients intraoperatively after completion of the laparoscopic gastric mobilization. The most frequent preoperative reason to select the two-stage procedure was a stenosis of the coeliac trunc and superior mesenteric artery (n = 10). The predominant cause for an intraoperative change of strategy was a laparoscopically diagnosed hepatic fibrosis/cirrhosis (n = 5).Overall morbidity and major' complications (CD > IIIa) were comparable for both groups (11.7% in both groups). The overall anastomotic leak rate was 12.4% and was non-significant lower for the two-stage procedure. CONCLUSION: Two-stage hILE is a feasible concept to individualize the surgical treatment of patients with well-defined clinical risk factors for postoperative morbidity. It can also be applied after completion of the abdominal phase of IL esophagectomy without compromising the patient safety.
Asunto(s)
Esofagectomía/métodos , Morbilidad/tendencias , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Anciano , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pretransplant psychosocial evaluation of living-donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) candidates identifies recipients with potentially inferior posttransplant outcomes. Rating instruments, based on semi-standardized interviews, help to improve and standardize psychosocial evaluation. The goal of this study was to retrospectively investigate the correlation between the Transplant Evaluation Rating Scale (TERS) and transplant outcome in LDKT recipients. METHODS: TERS scores were retrospectively generated by 2 raters based on comprehensive interviews of 146 LDKT recipients conducted by mental health professionals (interrater reliability, 0.8-0.9). All patients were eligible for transplantation according to pretransplant psychosocial evaluation. Patients were classified into 2 groups according to their TERS scores, in either two thirds excellent risk (TERS <29) and one third at least moderate risk (TERS ≥29) candidates. Analyzed medical parameters were change in estimated glomerular filtration rate and acute rejection (AR) episodes within the first year posttransplant. In addition, a subgroup of 65 patients was tested for de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) posttransplant. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the excellent (n = 97) and at least moderate (n = 49) risk candidates according to TERS in terms of organ function (estimated glomerular filtration rate decline >25%: 17 of 97 vs 11 of 49; P = .51) and episodes of AR (19 of 97 vs 15 of 49; P = .15). Patients developing de novo DSA (n = 18 [28%]) did not have higher pretransplant TERS scores (DSA positive, 11 of 42 vs 7 of 23; P = .78). CONCLUSIONS: Classifying LDKT recipients according to TERS score did not predict medical outcome at 1 year posttransplant or the occurrence of de novo DSA.
Asunto(s)
Rechazo de Injerto/psicología , Trasplante de Riñón/psicología , Donadores Vivos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/psicología , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anticuerpos/sangre , Anticuerpos/inmunología , Femenino , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Antígenos HLA/inmunología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Periodo Posoperatorio , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Immunosuppressive strategies applied in renal transplantation traditionally focus on T cell inhibition. B cells were mainly examined in the context of antibody-mediated rejection, whereas the impact of antibody-independent B cell functions has only recently entered the field of transplantation. Similar to T cells, distinct B cell subsets can enhance or inhibit immune responses. In this study, we prospectively analyzed the evolution of B cell subsets in the peripheral blood of AB0-compatible (n = 27) and AB0-incompatible (n = 10) renal transplant recipients. Activated B cells were transiently decreased and plasmablasts were permanently decreased in patients without signs of rejection throughout the first year. In patients with histologically confirmed renal allograft rejection, activated B cells and plasmablasts were significantly elevated on day 365. Rituximab treatment in AB0-incompatible patients resulted in long-lasting B cell depletion and in a naïve phenotype of repopulating B cells 1 year following transplantation. Acute allograft rejection was correlated with an increase of activated B cells and plasmablasts and with a significant reduction of regulatory B cell subsets. Our study demonstrates the remarkable effects of standard immunosuppression on circulating B cell subsets. Furthermore, the B cell compartment was significantly altered in rejecting patients. A specific targeting of deleterious B cell subsets could be of clinical benefit in renal transplantation.