RESUMEN

Background: The split anconeus fascia transfer (SAFT) is an option for reconstruction of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) in chronic posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI) of the elbow with potential advantages of using only local tissue within the surgical exposure and not requiring ulnar fixation. This study aimed to assess SAFT strength compared to a traditional free graft reconstruction in a PLRI biomechanical model. Methods: To measure biomechanical strength, eight cadaveric upper extremity pairs were utilized. Within each pair, one specimen was randomly assigned to LUCL reconstruction with autograft palmaris longus and the other to SAFT reconstruction. Torque load to failure was assessed on a load frame with the elbow in 30 degrees of flexion, 5 degrees of valgus, and 25 N axial load as the elbow was brought into external rotation. Torque load to failure was compared between the two reconstruction techniques. Results: No difference was found in the torque load to failure between SAFT specimens compared to palmaris longus autograft specimens (mean 14.6 ± 4.4 Nm vs. mean 11.3 ± 3.9 Nm; P = .16). Discussion: In this biomechanical study, the SAFT LUCL reconstruction provided torque load to failure similar to that of the traditional technique. These findings suggest that the SAFT technique warrants continued study as a biomechanically sound option for LUCL reconstruction in the setting of elbow PLRI.

RESUMEN

Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) use by both orthopedic surgeons and primary care providers (PCP) for analysis of elbow pathology is expensive and growing in frequency. In light of this, scrutiny regarding the appropriate utilization of this technology is increasing. Currently, there is no literature investigating the appropriateness of MRI use for complex elbow pathology from either orthopedic surgeons or PCPs. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on consecutive elbow MRIs performed at a tertiary care center between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2015. A total of 225 patients were included. Patients meeting the inclusion criteria were divided into two cohorts, determined by whether the ordering provider was an orthopedic surgeon or a PCP. MRI referrals were made by orthopedic surgeons in 94 patients and by nonorthopedic surgery providers in 131 patients. MRI diagnoses of no pathology, muscle/tendon tear, neuritis/nerve injury, tendinosis, ligament injury/instability, osteoarthritis/degenerative joint disease/decreased range of motion/contracture, or fracture/osteochondral injury were analyzed, as were the interventions of no intervention, nonprocedural treatment (therapy, orthosis, or nonoperative modality), nonsurgical procedure/referral for procedure, referral to surgeon, surgery, additional imaging/electrodiagnostic nerve testing, or other. Results: 1. Orthopedic surgeons are more accurate in their diagnoses after MRI, while PCPs order more MRI scans for 'routine' diagnoses typically made without MRI. 2. When the MRI did not validate an orthopedic surgeon's preimaging diagnosis, rates of surgery decreased. The same discrepancy in diagnosis leads to an increase in orthopedic surgeon referrals within the PCP cohort. 3. An MRI was ordered for "pain" by orthopedic surgeons and PCPs in approximately 30% of the patients in both groups with a similarly low rate of pathology discovery. Conclusions: The unexpected result of this study is that there is still a large quantity of MRI exams being conducted by orthopedic surgeons for the preMRI diagnosis of "pain." In both groups, there was a similar rate of negative imaging. We expected orthopedic surgeons who have advanced knowledge in musculoskeletal pathology would be less likely to order an MRI for pain and would also less likely order an MRI that resulted in no pathology. This places an increased and unnecessary burden on the financial aspect of the health care system.

RESUMEN

The one bone forearm is a salvage procedure for treatment of painful, instability of the forearm that results from trauma, congenital deformity, tumor, infection, and failed reconstructive efforts. By creating a stable osseous bridge between the ulnohumeral and radiocarpal joints, one bone forearm addresses defects in the bony architecture of the radius and ulna, their articulations, and their associated ligamentous complexes. Global instability of the forearm is a complex clinical pathology with few other answers. Choice of technique should be dictated by adjacent bone loss. This article presents experience with creating a one bone forearm in patients using synostosis procedures.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk factors for hypovitaminosis D and to determine the baseline vitamin D supplementation associated with normal vitamin D levels at presentation. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Level I trauma center. PATIENTS: This study included 259 adult patients undergoing operative treatment for orthopaedic trauma (OTA 11-15, 21-23, 31-34, 41-44, 61-62, 70C, 81-82, 87) between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2014. INTERVENTION: Prospective, observational study. MAIN OUTCOMES: Association of hypovitaminosis D with patient characteristics, injury factors, and vitamin D supplementation. RESULTS: Univariate predictors of hypovitaminosis D included a lack of preinjury supplementation, non-white race, younger age, female sex, non-Medicare insurance, smoking, obesity, Charlson Comorbidity Index <2, and high-energy mechanism. On multivariate analysis, preinjury supplementation was associated with a lower risk (odds ratio: 0.31, 95% confidence interval: 0.15-0.63, P = 0.001) and non-white race was associated with a higher risk (odds ratio: 3.63, 95% confidence interval: 1.58-8.37, P = 0.001) of hypovitaminosis D. Logistic regression analysis found a dose-dependent relationship between vitamin D supplementation and hypovitaminosis D. Each 100-IU increase in vitamin D supplementation was associated with an 8% decrease in the risk of hypovitaminosis D. CONCLUSIONS: A lack of preinjury supplementation and non-white race were independently associated with hypovitaminosis D. Baseline supplementation consistent with Endocrine Society guidelines (2000 IU daily) was more effective than that consistent with Institute of Medicine guidelines (400 IU daily) in maintaining 25-hydroxyvitamin D above 30 ng/mL in this population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Previous retrospective research found that the presence or absence of bridging callus within 4 months postoperatively discriminated accurately between eventual union and nonunion of fractures of the tibial shaft. However, there remains no consensus regarding early prognostication of long bone nonunion. We prospectively assessed the accuracy and reliability of the presence of any bridging callus within 4 months in a cohort that was expanded to include both tibial and femoral shaft fractures. METHODS: We identified 194 consecutive fractures of the shaft of the tibia (OTA/AO type 42-A, B, or C) and femur (OTA/AO type 32-A, B, or C) that were treated with intramedullary nailing. Exclusions for inadequate follow-up (55), extended delay prior to nailing (10), and skeletal immaturity (3) resulted in a study population of 126 fractures (56 tibiae and 70 femora) in 115 patients. Digital radiographs made between 3 and 4 months postoperatively were independently assessed by 3 orthopaedic traumatologists. The accuracy of assessment of the presence of any bridging callus, bicortical bridging, and tricortical bridging to predict union or nonunion was assessed with chi-square analysis and by interobserver reliability (kappa statistic). RESULTS: The nonunion rate was 4% (5 of 126 fractures). The presence of any bridging callus by 4 months accurately predicted union (121 of 122 fractures) and its absence predicted nonunion (4 of 4 fractures). There was 1 incorrect prediction of union for a fracture that failed to unite (p < 0.001). Bicortical or greater bridging predicted union when present (116 of 116 fractures) and nonunion when absent (5 of 10 fractures), incorrectly predicting that 5 healing fractures would go on to nonunion (p < 0.001). Tricortical or greater bridging predicted union when present (103 of 103 fractures) and nonunion when absent (5 of 23 fractures), incorrectly predicting that 18 healing fractures would go on to nonunion (p < 0.001). Interobserver reliability was calculated for any bridging (kappa value, 0.91), bicortical bridging (kappa value, 0.79), tricortical bridging (kappa value, 0.71), and the exact number of cortices bridged (kappa value, 0.67). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of any bridging callus within 4 months accurately predicts the final healing outcome for tibial and femoral shaft fractures treated with intramedullary nailing. This criterion is simple and reliable, and only standard radiographs are needed to make the determination. Basing the prognosis on the bridging of additional cortices risks overestimation of the nonunion rate and is associated with relatively poor reliability.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To compare the radiographic outcomes of 2 widely used side loading, press fit, RHA implants used to reconstruct complex elbow trauma. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Level-1 Academic trauma center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients undergoing RHA. INTERVENTION: Cohort 1 received Synthes Radial Head Prosthesis. Cohort 2 received Biomet ExploR Radial Head Replacement. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Radial neck dilatory remodeling. RESULTS: Eighty-two subjects were included in final analysis, 63 from the Biomet Cohort, and 19 from Synthes cohort. Demographic and injury characteristics were similar among cohorts. Radial neck dilatory remodeling as well as periprosthetic radiographic lucency were seen significantly more frequently and to a significantly greater degree in the Synthes cohort. The average percentage of dilatory remodeling of the Synthes cohort was 34.9% and that of the Biomet cohort was 2.7%. There were no differences in rates of revision surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates significant radiographic differences between 2 frequently used RHA implants. Radial neck dilatory remodeling is a common, rapidly progressive, and dramatic finding frequently seen with the Synthes Radial Head Prosthesis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Asunto(s)