RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To describe the semibranch as new tool to treat patients with thoracoabdominal, para- and juxtarenal aortic pathologies. TECHNIQUE: The technique is demonstrated in 2 patients with aortic pathologies. First, a 76-year-old woman with a type Ia endoleak after endovascular repair of abdominal aneurysm (EVAR). Due to the short mainbody of the EVAR and suprarenal extension of the pathology, a 4-branched device with integrated bifurcation was chosen. To realize a branched device in small diameters of the suprarenal aorta, 2 semibranches, for the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and the celiac trunc (CT), were planned. The second patient, a 75-year-old man, had a juxtarenal aneurysm. Due to small diameters of the aorta, semibranches for the SMA and the CT were planned. In both cases, a total transfemoral approach was used with a steerable sheath. Placement, cannulation of the semibranch, forwarding of the bridging stentgraft, and sealing was uneventful. All 4 semibranches were successful in sealing the aneurysm. CONCLUSION: The semibranch is another tool in the armamentarium of the endovascular interventionalist, which can expand the range of patients that can be treated. Especially patients with small aortic diameter or short distances between target vessels with the same offspring angle can profit from the semibranch design. CLINICAL IMPACT: The semibranch is a new tool to treat thoracoabdominal as well para- and juxtarenal aortic pathologies. Due to its reduced length, packaging density can be higher and diameter of the stentgraft can be larger. It closes the gap in pathologies where fenestration are not suitable (kinked aortas) and there is not enough space for standard inner branches (small diameters).

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Carbon dioxide (CO2) angiography for endovascular aortic repair (CO2-EVAR) is used to treat abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), especially in patients with chronic kidney disease or allergy to iodinated contrast medium (ICM). However, some technical issues regarding the visualization of the lowest renal artery (LoRA) and the best quality image through angiographies performed from pigtail or introducer sheath are still unsolved. The aim of this study was to analyze different steps of CO2-EVAR to create an operative standardized protocol. METHODS: Patients undergoing CO2-EVAR were prospectively enrolled in five European centers from 2019 to 2021. CO2-EVAR was performed using an automated injector (pressure, 600 mmHg; volume, 100 cc); a small amount of ICM was injected in case of difficulty in LoRA visualization. LoRA visualization and image quality (1 = low, 2 = sufficient, 3 = good, 4 = excellent) were analyzed at different procedure steps: preoperative CO2 angiography from pigtail and femoral introducer sheath (first step), angiographies from pigtail at 0%, 50%, and 100% of proximal main body deployment (second step), contralateral hypogastric artery (CHA) visualization with CO2 injection from femoral introducer sheath (third step), and completion angiogram from pigtail and femoral introducer sheath (fourth step). Intraoperative and postoperative CO2-related adverse events were also evaluated. χ2 and Wilcoxon tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: In the considered period, 65 patients undergoing CO2-EVAR were enrolled (55/65 [84.5%] male; median age, 75 years [interquartile range (IQR), 11.5 years]). The median ICM injected was 17 cc (IQR, 51 cc); 19 (29.2%) of 65 procedures were performed with 0 cc ICM. Fifty-five (84.2%) of 65 patients underwent general anesthesia. In the first step, median image quality was significantly higher with CO2 injected from femoral introducer (pigtail, 2 [IQR, 3] vs introducer, 3 [IQR, 3]; P = .008). In the second step, LoRA was more frequently detected at 50% (93% vs 73.2%; P = .002) and 100% (94.1% vs 78.4%; P = .01) of proximal main body deployment compared with first angiography from pigtail; similarly, image quality was significantly higher at 50% (3 [IQR, 3] vs 2 [IQR, 3]; P ≤ .001) and 100% (4 [IQR, 3] vs 2 [IQR, 3]; P = .001) of proximal main body deployment. CHA was detected in 93% cases (third step). The mean image quality was significantly higher when final angiogram (fourth step) was performed from introducer (pigtail, 2.6 ± 1.1 vs introducer, 3.1 ± 0.9; P ≤ .001). The intraoperative (7.7%) and postoperative (12.5%) adverse events (pain, vomiting, diarrhea) were all transient and clinically mild. CONCLUSIONS: Preimplant CO2 angiography should be performed from femoral introducer sheath. Gas flow impediment created by proximal main body deployment can improve image quality and LoRA visualization with CO2. CHA can be satisfactorily visualized with CO2 alone. Completion CO2 angiogram should be performed from femoral introducer sheath. This operative protocol allows performance of CO2-EVAR with 0 cc or minimal ICM, with a low rate of mild temporary complications.

Asunto(s)

Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Humanos , Masculino , Anciano , Femenino , Aortografía/métodos , Dióxido de Carbono/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Medios de Contraste/efectos adversos , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/complicaciones , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto

RESUMEN

(1) Successful endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms is based on the complete exclusion of the aneurysm sac from the systemic circulation. Type Ia endoleak (ELIA) is defined as the persistent perfusion of the aneurysm sac due to incomplete proximal sealing between aorta and endograft, with a consequent risk of rupture and death. Endoleak embolization has been sporadically reported as a viable treatment for ELIA. (2) A systematic literature search in PubMed of all publications in English about ELIA embolization was performed until February 2022. Research methods and reporting were performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Data regarding patient numbers, technical success (endoleak absence at control angiography), reinterventions, clinical and imaging follow-up, and outcomes were collected and examined by two independent authors. (3) Twenty-one papers (12 original articles, 9 case reports) reported on 126 patients (age range 58-96 years) undergoing ELIA embolization 0-139 months after the index procedure. Indication for embolization was most often founded on unfavorable anatomy and patient comorbidities. Embolic agents used include liquid embolic agents, coils, plugs and combinations thereof. Technical success in this highly selected cohort ranged from 67-100%; the postprocedural complication rate within 30 days was 0-24%. ELIA recurrence was reported as 0-42.8%, with a secondary ELIA-embolization-intervention success rate of 50-100%. At a follow-up at 0-68 months, freedom from sac enlargement amounted to 76-100%, freedom from ELIA to 66.7-100%. (4) Specific literature about ELIA embolization is scant. ELIA embolization is a valuable bailout strategy for no-option patients; the immediate technical success rate is high and midterm and long-term outcomes are acceptable.