Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Pediatr ; 240: 319-320, 2022 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34416261

Asunto(s)
Vacunación , Humanos
2.
Bioethics ; 35(6): 563-573, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33951203

RESUMEN

Genetic engineering has been a topic of discussion for over 50 years, but it is only recently that gene editing has become a reality. CRISPR biotechnologies have made gene editing much safer, precise and feasible. We have witnessed the first cases of human germline genetic modification resulting in live births, conducted by He Jiankui. In this paper, we will analyse He Jiankui's case in relation to one of the most difficult problems in procreative ethics (or the ethics of future generations): the non-identity problem. We believe that this analysis will help us to understand the ethics involved in gene editing and hopefully allow for a better, more philosophically grounded legislation on CRISPR and other gene-editing technologies.


Asunto(s)
Repeticiones Palindrómicas Cortas Agrupadas y Regularmente Espaciadas , Edición Génica , Ingeniería Genética , Células Germinativas , Humanos
3.
J Pediatr ; 231: 10-16, 2021 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33484698

RESUMEN

Whether children should be vaccinated against coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) (or other infectious diseases such as influenza) and whether some degree of coercion should be exercised by the state to ensure high uptake depends, among other things, on the safety and efficacy of the vaccine. For COVID-19, these factors are currently unknown for children, with unanswered questions also on children's role in the transmission of the virus, the extent to which the vaccine will decrease transmission, and the expected benefit (if any) to the child. Ultimately, deciding whether to recommend that children receive a novel vaccine for a disease that is not a major threat to them, or to mandate the vaccine, requires precise information on the risks, including disease severity and vaccine safety and effectiveness, a comparative evaluation of the alternatives, and the levels of coercion associated with each. However, the decision also requires balancing self-interest with duty to others, and liberty with usefulness. Separate to ensuring vaccine supply and access, we outline 3 requirements for mandatory vaccination from an ethical perspective: (1) whether the disease is a grave threat to the health of children and to public health, (2) positive comparative expected usefulness of mandatory vaccination, and (3) proportionate coercion. We also suggest that the case for mandatory vaccine in children may be strong in the case of influenza vaccination during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19/prevención & control , Política de Salud , Programas Obligatorios/ética , Vacunación Masiva/ética , Niño , Coerción , Humanos , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana/prevención & control
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA