Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open ; 9(1): e001367, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39296594

RESUMEN

Background: End-of-life (EOL) care is associated with high resource utilization. Recognizing and effectively communicating that EOL is near promotes more patient-centered care, while decreasing futile interventions. We hypothesize that provider assessment of futility during the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) admission would result in higher rates of Do Not Resuscitate (DNR). Methods: We performed a retrospective review of a prospective SICU registry of all deceased patients across a health system, 2018-2022. The registry included a subjective provider assessment of patient's expected survival. We employed multivariable logistic regression to adjust for clinical factors while assessing for association between code status at death and provider's survival assessment with attention to race-based differences. Results: 746 patients-105 (14.1%) traumatically injured and 641 (85.9%) non-traumatically injured-died over 4.5 years in the SICU (mortality rate 5.9%). 26.3% of these deaths were expected by the ICU provider. 40.9% of trauma patients were full code at the time of death, compared with 15.6% of non-traumatically injured patients. Expected death was associated with increased odds of DNR code status for non-traumatically injured patients (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.03 to 3.18), but not for traumatically injured patients (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.22 to 3.08). After adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics, black patients were less likely to be DNR at the time of death (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.75). Conclusion: 20% of patients who died in our SICU had not declared a DNR status, with injured black patients more likely to remain full code at the time of death. Further evaluation of this cohort to optimize recognition and communication of EOL is needed to avoid unnecessary suffering. Level of evidence: Level III/prognostic and epidemiological.

2.
J Trauma Nurs ; 30(6): 318-327, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37937871

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Transitions between clinical units are vulnerable periods for patients. A significant body of evidence describes the importance of structured transitions, but there is limited reporting of what happens. Describing transitions within a conceptual model will characterize the salient forces that interact during a patient transition and, perhaps, lead to improved outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To describe the processes and resources that trauma centers use to transition patients from critical care to nonintensive care units. METHODS: This cross-sectional study surveyed all Level I and II trauma centers listed in the American Trauma Society database from September 2020 to November 2020. Data were merged from the American Hospital Association 2018 Hospital Survey. RESULTS: A total of 567 surveys were distributed, of which 152 responded for a (27%) response rate. Results were organized in categories: capital input, organizational facets, employee behavior, employee terms/scope, and labor inputs. Resources and processes varied; the most important opportunities for transition improvement included: (1) handoff instruments were only reported at 36% (n = 27) of trauma centers, (2) mandatory resident education about transitions was only reported at 70% (n = 16) of trauma centers, and (3) only 6% (n = 4) of trauma centers reported electronic medical record applications that enact features to influence employee behavior. CONCLUSIONS: After years of focusing on transitions as a high-stake period, there remain many opportunities to develop resources and enact effective processes to address the variability in transition practice across trauma centers.


Asunto(s)
Transferencia de Pacientes , Centros Traumatológicos , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Estudios Transversales , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Cuidados Críticos
4.
Int J Qual Health Care ; 29(3): 412-419, 2017 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28371889

RESUMEN

QUALITY PROBLEM: Patients recently discharged from the intensive care unit (ICU) are at high risk for clinical deterioration. INITIAL ASSESSMENT: Unreliable and incomplete handoffs of complex patients contributed to preventable ICU readmissions. Respiratory decompensation was responsible for four times as many readmissions as other causes. CHOICE OF SOLUTION: Form a multidisciplinary team to address care coordination surrounding the transfer of patients from the ICU to the surgical ward. IMPLEMENTATION: A quality improvement intervention incorporating verbal handoffs, time-sensitive patient evaluations and visual cues was piloted over a 1-year period in consecutive high-risk surgical patients discharged from the ICU. Process metrics and clinical outcomes were compared to historical controls. EVALUATION: The intervention brought the primary team and respiratory therapists to the bedside for a baseline examination within 60 min of ward arrival. Stakeholders viewed the intervention as such a valuable adjunct to patient care that the intervention has become a standard of care. While not significant, in a comparatively older and sicker intervention population, the rate of readmissions due to respiratory decompensation was 12.5%, while 35.0% in the control group (P = 0.28). LESSONS LEARNED: The implementation of this ICU transition protocol is feasible and internationally applicable, and results in improved care coordination and communication for a high-risk group of patients.


Asunto(s)
Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Pase de Guardia/organización & administración , Transferencia de Pacientes/organización & administración , Centros Médicos Académicos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cuidados Críticos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Transferencia de Pacientes/métodos , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/prevención & control , Terapia Respiratoria , Factores de Riesgo
5.
J Homosex ; 55(3): 504-23, 2008.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19042283

RESUMEN

This study provides an analysis of gay men's magazines, examining both the content and advertisements. Four magazine titles were selected, including The Advocate, Genre, Instinct, and Out, each targeting gay men as its target audience. These magazines were coded for both article content and advertisement content. In the advertisement analysis, both the type of advertisement and characteristics of the men depicted within the advertisement when present. The results mirror previous research findings relating to the portrayal of women, including the objectification of specific body parts and the high community standards set by the images depicted. These findings were reinforced by both the advertisements and content analyzed to include a high degree of importance being placed on having the right body type. Implications for further research are discussed.


Asunto(s)
Homosexualidad Masculina , Publicaciones Periódicas como Asunto , Autoimagen , Publicidad , Imagen Corporal , Humanos , Masculino
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA