RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to elucidate whether the survival and long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes of extremely preterm infants have improved in a Japanese tertiary center with an active treatment policy for infants born at 22-23 weeks of gestation. STUDY DESIGN: This single-centered retrospective cohort study enrolled extremely preterm infants treated at Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, from 2003 to 2014. Patients with major congenital abnormalities were excluded. Primary outcomes were in-hospital survival and severe neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) at 6 years of age, which was defined as having severe cerebral palsy, severe cognitive impairment, severe visual impairment, or deafness. We assessed the changes in primary outcomes between the first (period 1; 2003-2008) and the second half (period 2; 2009-2014) of the study period and evaluated the association between birth-year and primary outcomes using multivariate logistic regression models. RESULTS: Of the 403 eligible patients, 340 (84%) survived to discharge. Among 248 patients available at 6 years of age, 43 (14%) were classified as having severe NDI. Between the 2 periods, in-hospital survival improved from 155 of 198 (78%) to 185 of 205 (90%), but severe NDI increased from 11 of 108 (10%) to 32 of 140 (23%). In multivariate logistic regression models adjusted for gestational age, birthweight, sex, singleton birth, and antenatal corticosteroids, the aOR (95% CI) of birth-year for in-hospital survival and severe NDI was 1.2 (1.1-1.3) and 1.1 (1.0-1.3), respectively. CONCLUSION: Mortality among extremely preterm infants has improved over the past 12 years; nevertheless, no significant improvement was observed in the long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Pueblos del Este de Asia , Recien Nacido Extremadamente Prematuro , Trastornos del Neurodesarrollo , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Edad Gestacional , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Hospitales/normas , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales/tendencias , Trastornos del Neurodesarrollo/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros de Atención Terciaria/normas , Centros de Atención Terciaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros de Atención Terciaria/tendencias , Preescolar , NiñoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To establish the superiority of blood flow (BF)-based circulatory management over conventional blood pressure (BP)-based management strategies used for preventing intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) in infants of very low birth weight (VLBW). STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a nonblinded, single-centered randomized trial with the aim to prevent IVH by managing BF. Infants with VLBW were assigned randomly to a BF-based group or BP-based (BP group) circulatory management group. The incidence of IVH was the outcome of interest. The IVH also data were compared among healthy patients and patients responsive and unresponsive to the intervention. RESULTS: A total of 219 and 220 infants with VLBW were assigned to the BF and BP groups, respectively. The IVH incidence rate was lower in the BF group, but the difference was not statistically significant (BF group, 6.8% vs BP group, 10.9%; P = .14). In 21% of patients of the BP group and 20% of the BF group, the intervention failed. In BF group, the IVH incidence rate was significantly greater in infants with unsuccessful intervention when compared with healthy individuals (6% vs 23%, P = .001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed a correlation between low blood flow and IVH (aOR 3.24; 95% CI 1.49-7.08, P = .003) but not between low BP and IVH (P = .73). CONCLUSIONS: The BF management protocol did not significantly decrease the incidence of IVH. However, after further optimization, we speculate the treatment strategy holds promise in decreasing the incidence of IVH. Trial registration UMIN-CTR: UMIN000013296.