RESUMEN
Background Chronic liver disease (CLD) is one of the most significant causes of morbidity and mortality among the pediatric age group. The identification of the etiology of the disease is of utmost importance for the effective management of the disease. Objective To determine the various causes of CLD in pediatric patients attending a large public sector pediatric hospital. Patients and methods A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted at the National Institute of Child Health, Karachi, Pakistan from August 1, 2021, to February 28, 2022. All patients below 16 years of age of either gender with more than three months of symptoms duration on admission were enrolled. The diagnosis was labeled after the standard reference ranges for the pediatric age group. Results Of 136 patients, the mean age was 4.42 ± 3.92 years. More than half of the patients were males (76, 55.9%). Hepatitis B (31, 22.8%), idiopathic (23, 16.9%), glycogen storage disorder (GSD) (21, 15.4%), and Wilson disease (14, 10.3%) were the most common cause of CLD. A significant association of hepatitis was observed with age (p-value < 0.001), residence (p-value = 0.048), symptomatic (p-value < 0.001), total bilirubin level (p-value = 0.003), direct bilirubin level (p-value = 0.002), and albumin level (p-value = 0.003). Whereas a significant association of GSD was observed with age (p-value = 0.001), residence (p-value < 0.001), and serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) level (p-value = 0.033). Conclusion In our cohort, hepatitis B, idiopathic, GSD, and Wilson disease were the most common causes of CLD in pediatric patients. Moreover, age, residence, symptomatic, total bilirubin level, direct bilirubin level, SGPT, and albumin level were the important predictor variables.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to compare the knowledge and attitudes of pharmacy and medical students regarding adverse drug reactions (ADRs), as well as their perceptions of barriers to ADR reporting, in a Higher Education Commission-recognised Pakistani university. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among final-year pharmacy (n=91) and medical (n=108) students in Pakistan from June 1 to July 31, 2014. A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect the data. The responses of pharmacy students were compared to those of medical students. RESULTS: Pharmacy students had a significantly better knowledge of ADRs than medical students (mean±SD, 5.61±1.78 vs. 3.23±1.60; P<0.001). Gender showed a significant relationship to knowledge about ADRs, and male participants were apparently more knowledgeable than their female counterparts (P<0.001). The attitudes of pharmacy students regarding their capability to handle and report ADRs were significantly more positive than those of medical students (P<0.05). In comparison to pharmacy students, a lack of knowledge of where and how to report ADRs was the main barrier that medical students perceived to ADR reporting (P=0.001). CONCLUSION: Final-year pharmacy students exhibited more knowledge about ADRs and showed more positive attitudes regarding their capacity to handle and report ADRs than final-year medical students.