RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To present an atypical case of acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy in a 15 year old treated with immunosuppressive therapy. METHODS: Interventional case report. RESULTS: On initial presentation, the vision was 20/200 in the right eye and 20/300 in the left eye. The posterior poles of both eyes showed numerous creamy-white placoid lesions. Fundus autofluorescence demonstrated hypoautofluorescence lesions with hyperautofluorescence rims, while fluorescein angiography showed early blockage followed by late staining. These findings were consistent with a diagnosis of acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy. Optical coherence tomography demonstrated outer retinal disruptions and thinning. Due to the severity of his disease, the patient was treated first with oral prednisone and later transitioned to mycophenolate mofetil by 2 months. His poor vision persisted beyond a 5-month follow-up visit despite fading of the lesions and reconstitution of the outer retinal layers and thickness on optical coherence tomography. By 8 months of follow-up, the visual acuity returned to 20/20 bilaterally without any further recurrences. CONCLUSION: Although most patients with acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy have a relatively short course and recover vision quickly, the use of steroids and immunosuppression may be of benefit for those patients with severe and prolonged visual loss.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de la Visión , Síndromes de Puntos Blancos , Adolescente , Angiografía con Fluoresceína , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos de la Visión/etiología , Síndromes de Puntos Blancos/complicaciones , Síndromes de Puntos Blancos/diagnósticoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To report a case of caterpillar setae embedded in the corneal stroma and inferotemporal retina with minimal inflammation. DESIGN: Observational case report. METHODS: A 4-year-old boy developed a red eye after playing with a caterpillar. He was placed on topical tobramycin/dexamethasone and referred for evaluation of embedded setae in his conjunctiva, cornea, iris, and retina. Examination revealed no iridocyclitis or vitritis. RESULTS: Because of the lack of intraocular inflammatory response, no invasive intervention was conducted to remove or destroy the setae and he was tapered off the tobramycin/dexamethasone. At 4-month follow-up he remained asymptomatic with the setae still present in both his cornea and retina. In addition, vitreous membranes had formed in the immediate vicinity of the intraretinal setae. CONCLUSION: Intraretinal and corneal setae can be embedded with minimal inflammation and can be tolerated without need for surgical intervention.