RESUMEN
To investigate the clinical usefulness of coronary arteriography using a gadolinium contrast medium (hereinafter referred to as Gd contrast medium) in patients with iodine allergy, images obtained using an iodinated contrast medium and a Gd contrast medium were compared using respective phantoms. Within the range of the effective energy (34.8 to 41.0 keV) in clinical use, the tube-voltage dependency of the Gd contrast medium was lower than that of the iodinated contrast medium. The contrast ratios were found to be comparable for the images obtained by a 4-fold-diluted iodinated contrast medium and the undiluted Gd contrast medium. Although the assessment of stenotic ratio was difficult to obtain by visual evaluation of the clinical images, due to unclear borders of the blood vessels, the presence or absence of significant stenosis was discriminative by arteriography using the Gd contrast medium. Based on these findings, it was considered necessary to make a confirmed diagnosis using a Gd contrast medium with concurrent diagnosis by intravascular echography. In conclusion, coronary arteriography and PCI using a Gd contrast medium are considered to offer benefit to the diagnosis and treatment of patients with iodine allergy.
Asunto(s)
Medios de Contraste , Angiografía Coronaria/métodos , Gadolinio , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/métodos , Medios de Contraste/efectos adversos , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/etiología , Humanos , Yodo/efectos adversos , Fantasmas de ImagenRESUMEN
The INNOVA 2000, an all-digital cardiovascular X-ray system with flat panel detector, is equipped with a monitoring function that makes it possible to track a patient's absorbed dose by displaying the real-time presumed absorbed dose. We verified this dose monitoring system and evaluated how it is affected by various parameters. We also compared the INNOVA 2000 to a conventional machine, the Advantx LC. The average absorbed dose of the INNOVA 2000 was 1,066 mGy, while that of the Advantx LC was calculated to be 2,028 mGy. Dose reduction with the INNOVA 2000 was 76% at Low mode and 52% even at Normal mode. The INNOVA provides an advantage in lowering absorbed dose, even considering that it has a rectangular image intensifier (I.I.) versus the Advantx LC's round I.I. This comparison was made by cine and digital angiography.