RESUMEN

Background: Personalized Normative Feedback (PNF) aims to modify misperceptions about peer consumption that influence one's drinking. PNF is usually a component in Brief Interventions delivered to university students. Despite this, whether PNF contributes to improving the effect of brief interventions is unclear. Objectives: This randomized controlled trial aimed to determine the role of PNF as an active ingredient in a face-to-face motivational brief intervention. Results: Participants were students from an Argentinian university (n=806; M=20.14; SD=3.17; 63.2% women) who presented at least one binge drinking episode in the last 12 months. Students were randomly assigned to 1) a Brief Intervention, 2) a Brief Intervention with PNF, or 3) an evaluation-only control group. The follow-up was three months later. After controlling sex and age, General Linear Models showed that both the brief intervention and the brief intervention with PNF reduced the quantity and frequency of alcohol consumption, binge drinking, and alcohol problems compared to the control condition. No differences were found between the brief intervention and the brief intervention with PNF. Also, treating eight students with brief intervention and 10 with brief intervention with PNF was necessary to benefit one student. Conclusions: In conclusion, this study demonstrates that brief intervention reduces alcohol consumption among Latin American university students and that PNF might not be an active ingredient of its effectiveness in this population. However, PNF could benefit students with specific characteristics, like those who overestimate their peers' drinking, highlighting the need to study moderators of effectiveness further.

RESUMEN

Current efforts to better understand alcohol use disorder (AUD) have led to revisions of the most used classification systems, the DSM and the ICD. There is scarce information regarding how the latest versions of those two classification systems (DSM-5 and ICD-11) relate to functional characteristics (functional impairment (FI) and subjective distress (SD)) associated with AUD. Aim:To examine how the primary diagnostic system's criteria (DSM) and guidelines (ICD) were related to two functional characteristics (FI and SD) as evidence of these systems' concurrent validity in Argentineans with AUD. Methods:We conducted a cross-sectional correlational study with a clinical sample (n=34) in 2018. Results:AUD's severity was more strongly related to SD than FI. FI was weakly related to the criterion of much time spent usingit. We found weak associations between SD and role impairment, interpersonal problems, tolerance, and physical or psychological problems due to use, withdrawal, and much time spent using. Only one of the ICD guidelines was weakly related to SD, and we found moderate positive correlations between DSM-5 and FI and between DSM-5 and SD. Conclusion:DSM-5 was more accurate than ICD-11 in identifying those with higher levels of FI and SD and, thus, had a greater concurrent validity among a clinical sample of Argentineans with AUD. Our results contribute to a better understanding of the detection of alcohol-related conditions. Keywords:alcohol-related disorders; diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders; international classification of diseases;psychological distress

Los esfuerzos por comprender mejor el trastorno por uso de alcohol (TUA) han dado lugar a revisiones de los sistemas de clasificación más utilizados, el DSM y la ICD. Hay escasa información sobre cómo sus últimas versiones (DSM-5 y ICD-11) se relacionan con las características funcionales (deterioro funcional (DF) y angustia subjetiva (AS)) asociadas con el TUA. Objetivo: examinar cómo los criterios de los sistemas de diagnóstico se relacionaron con dos características funcionales (DF y AS) como evidencia de la validez concurrente en argentinos con TUA. Métodos: Realizamos un estudio correlacional-transversal con una muestra clínica (n= 34) en el año 2018. Resultados: La gravedad del AUD estuvo más fuertemente relacionada con la AS que con la DF. El DF se relacionó débilmente con el criterio mucho tiempo dedicado al uso. Se encontraron asociaciones débiles entre AS y deterioro de roles, problemas interpersonales, tolerancia y problemas físicos o psicológicos debido al uso, abstinencia y mucho tiempo dedicado al uso. Sólo una de las guías de la CIE estaba débilmente relacionada con la AS, y encontramos correlaciones positivas moderadas entre el DSM-5 y AS y entre el DSM-5 y DF. Conclusión: El DSM-5 fue más preciso que la CIE-11 para identificar a aquellos con mayores niveles de AS y DF y, por tanto, tuvo una mayor validez concurrente en la población observada. Estos resultados contribuyen a una mejor comprensión de la detección de las condiciones mentales relacionadas con el uso de alcohol. Palabras clave: trastornos relacionados con alcohol; manual diagnóstico y estadístico de los trastornos mentales; clasificación internacional de enfermedades; distrés psicológico

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objective: To report the risk from alcohol, cannabis, and their combined use for non-fatal road traffic injuries for drivers, passengers, and pedestrians. Methods: Risk was estimated using the case-crossover method. Participants (N= 306) were injured patients from an emergency department in Mar del Plata, Argentina. Results: Alcohol use (OR= 6.78, CI 95% 3.75-12.25) as well as combined alcohol and cannabis use (OR= 7.05, CI 95% 1.16-42.73) significantly increased the risk of a road traffic injuries. Alcohol use increased the risk in both, women (OR= 8.87, CI 95% 2.69-29.21) and men (OR= 6.16, CI 95% 3.10-12.23); in those >30 years old (OR= 6.01, CI 95% 2.09-17.24) and those <30 years old (OR= 7.15, CI 95% 3.49-14.65). This last group also had an increased risk after combined alcohol and cannabis use (OR= 7.05, CI 95% 1.16-42.75). Both drivers (OR= 6.40, CI 95% 3.23-12.69) and passengers (OR= 13.83, CI 95% 2.87-66.42) had an increased risk after alcohol consumption. Conclusions: To our knowledge, these are the first estimates of the risk of having a road traffic injury after alcohol and cannabis consumption in one of the countries of the Southern Cone (Argentina, Chile, and Uruguay). These results highlight the urgent need to implement and enforce comprehensive alcohol control measures. Furthermore, given the global trend towards legalizing cannabis for recreational use, our results could also inform policymakers to enact or amend impaired driving laws.

RESUMEN

[ABSTRACT]. Objective. To report the risk from alcohol, cannabis, and their combined use for non-fatal road traffic injuries for drivers, passengers, and pedestrians. Methods. Risk was estimated using the case-crossover method. Participants (N= 306) were injured patients from an emergency department in Mar del Plata, Argentina. Results. Alcohol use (OR= 6.78, CI 95% 3.75-12.25) as well as combined alcohol and cannabis use (OR= 7.05, CI 95% 1.16-42.73) significantly increased the risk of a road traffic injuries. Alcohol use increased the risk in both, women (OR= 8.87, CI 95% 2.69-29.21) and men (OR= 6.16, CI 95% 3.10-12.23); in those >30 years old (OR= 6.01, CI 95% 2.09-17.24) and those <30 years old (OR= 7.15, CI 95% 3.49-14.65). This last group also had an increased risk after combined alcohol and cannabis use (OR= 7.05, CI 95% 1.16-42.75). Both drivers (OR= 6.40, CI 95% 3.23-12.69) and passengers (OR= 13.83, CI 95% 2.87-66.42) had an increased risk after alcohol consumption. Conclusions. To our knowledge, these are the first estimates of the risk of having a road traffic injury after alcohol and cannabis consumption in one of the countries of the Southern Cone (Argentina, Chile, and Uruguay). These results highlight the urgent need to implement and enforce comprehensive alcohol control measures. Furthermore, given the global trend towards legalizing cannabis for recreational use, our results could also inform policymakers to enact or amend impaired driving laws.

[RESUMEN]. Objetivo. Informar sobre el riesgo lesiones por accidentes de tránsito debido al consumo de alcohol, cannabis o su combinación en conductores, pasajeros y peatones. Métodos. Se estimó el riesgo mediante el método de casos cruzados. Los participantes (N = 306) fueron pacientes que habían sufrido lesiones, provenientes de una sala de urgencias en Mar del Plata (Argentina). Resultados. El consumo de alcohol (OR = 6,78, IC95% 3,75-12,25), así como el consumo combinado de alcohol y cannabis (OR = 7,05, IC95% 1,16-42,73) aumentaron significativamente el riesgo de traumatismos por accidentes de tránsito. El consumo de alcohol aumentó el riesgo tanto en mujeres (OR = 8,87, IC95% 2,69-29,21) como en hombres (OR = 6,16, IC95% 3,10-12,23); así como en mayores de 30 años (OR = 6,01, IC95% 2,09-17,24) y en menores de 30 años (OR = 7,15, IC95% 3,49-14,65). Este último grupo también tuvo mayor riesgo tras un consumo combinado de alcohol y cannabis (OR = 7,05, IC95% 1,16-42,75). Tanto los conductores (OR = 6,40, IC95% 3,23-12,69) como los pasajeros (OR = 13,83, IC95% 2,87-66,42) presentaron mayor riesgo después del consumo de alcohol. Conclusiones. Hasta donde sabemos, estas son las primeras estimaciones del riesgo de sufrir lesiones por accidentes de tránsito tras el consumo de alcohol y cannabis en uno de los países del Cono Sur (Argentina, Chile y Uruguay). Estos resultados ponen de relieve la urgente necesidad de aplicar y hacer cumplir medidas integrales de control del alcohol. Además, dada la tendencia mundial hacia la legalización del cannabis para consumo recreativo, nuestros resultados también podrían orientar a los responsables de las políticas para que promulguen o enmienden las leyes sobre la conducción con capacidades alteradas debido al consumo de sustancias.

[RESUMO]. Objetivo. Relatar o risco de lesões não fatais no trânsito atribuível ao álcool, à cannabis e a seu uso combinado para motoristas, passageiros e pedestres. Métodos. O risco foi estimado usando o método clínico cruzado (case-crossover). Os participantes (N=306) eram feridos atendidos em um pronto-socorro em Mar del Plata, Argentina. Resultados. O uso de álcool (OR = 6,78, IC95% 3,75; 12,25) e o uso combinado de álcool e cannabis (OR= 7,05, IC95% 1,16; 42,73) aumentaram significativamente o risco de lesões no trânsito. O uso de álcool aumentou o risco tanto em mulheres (OR = 8,87, IC95% 2,69; 29,21) quanto em homens (OR = 6,16, IC95% 3,10; 12,23); naqueles >30 anos de idade (OR = 6,01, IC95% 2,09; 17,24) e <30 anos de idade (OR = 7,15, IC95% 3,49; 14,65). Esse último grupo também apresentou um risco maior após o uso combinado de álcool e cannabis (OR = 7,05, IC95% 1,16; 42,75). Tanto motoristas (OR = 6,40, IC95% 3,23; 12,69) quanto passageiros (OR = 13,83, IC95% 2,87; 66,42) apresentaram risco maior após o consumo de álcool. Conclusões. Até onde sabemos, estas são as primeiras estimativas do risco de lesões de trânsito após o consumo de álcool e cannabis em um dos países do Cone Sul (Argentina, Chile e Uruguai). Os resultados destacam a necessidade urgente de implementar e aplicar medidas abrangentes de controle do álcool. Além disso, considerando a tendência global de legalização da cannabis para uso recreativo, nossos resultados também poderiam ajudar os formuladores de políticas a decretar ou alterar as leis sobre a condução sob efeito de substâncias psicoativas.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

This study aimed to identify alcohol use disorder (AUD) criteria that better characterized those who seek treatment and those who recover on their own. We gathered data from help-seeking (HS) patients in an alcohol unit and compared them with self-achieved remission (SAR) patients. The best criteria to predict HS were psychological problems due to use, physical problems due to use, repeated attempts or desire to stop using, and not being able to stop drinking. The best criteria to predict SAR were tolerance, craving, hazardous use, much time spent, larger/longer use than intended, and role impairment. We discuss the impact of these results in current efforts to improve the accuracy of AUD diagnosis.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT Objective. To report the risk from alcohol, cannabis, and their combined use for non-fatal road traffic injuries for drivers, passengers, and pedestrians. Methods. Risk was estimated using the case-crossover method. Participants (N= 306) were injured patients from an emergency department in Mar del Plata, Argentina. Results. Alcohol use (OR= 6.78, CI 95% 3.75-12.25) as well as combined alcohol and cannabis use (OR= 7.05, CI 95% 1.16-42.73) significantly increased the risk of a road traffic injuries. Alcohol use increased the risk in both, women (OR= 8.87, CI 95% 2.69-29.21) and men (OR= 6.16, CI 95% 3.10-12.23); in those >30 years old (OR= 6.01, CI 95% 2.09-17.24) and those <30 years old (OR= 7.15, CI 95% 3.49-14.65). This last group also had an increased risk after combined alcohol and cannabis use (OR= 7.05, CI 95% 1.16-42.75). Both drivers (OR= 6.40, CI 95% 3.23-12.69) and passengers (OR= 13.83, CI 95% 2.87-66.42) had an increased risk after alcohol consumption. Conclusions. To our knowledge, these are the first estimates of the risk of having a road traffic injury after alcohol and cannabis consumption in one of the countries of the Southern Cone (Argentina, Chile, and Uruguay). These results highlight the urgent need to implement and enforce comprehensive alcohol control measures. Furthermore, given the global trend towards legalizing cannabis for recreational use, our results could also inform policymakers to enact or amend impaired driving laws.

RESUMEN Objetivo. Informar sobre el riesgo lesiones por accidentes de tránsito debido al consumo de alcohol, cannabis o su combinación en conductores, pasajeros y peatones. Métodos. Se estimó el riesgo mediante el método de casos cruzados. Los participantes (N = 306) fueron pacientes que habían sufrido lesiones, provenientes de una sala de urgencias en Mar del Plata (Argentina). Resultados. El consumo de alcohol (OR = 6,78, IC95% 3,75-12,25), así como el consumo combinado de alcohol y cannabis (OR = 7,05, IC95% 1,16-42,73) aumentaron significativamente el riesgo de traumatismos por accidentes de tránsito. El consumo de alcohol aumentó el riesgo tanto en mujeres (OR = 8,87, IC95% 2,69-29,21) como en hombres (OR = 6,16, IC95% 3,10-12,23); así como en mayores de 30 años (OR = 6,01, IC95% 2,09-17,24) y en menores de 30 años (OR = 7,15, IC95% 3,49-14,65). Este último grupo también tuvo mayor riesgo tras un consumo combinado de alcohol y cannabis (OR = 7,05, IC95% 1,16-42,75). Tanto los conductores (OR = 6,40, IC95% 3,23-12,69) como los pasajeros (OR = 13,83, IC95% 2,87-66,42) presentaron mayor riesgo después del consumo de alcohol. Conclusiones. Hasta donde sabemos, estas son las primeras estimaciones del riesgo de sufrir lesiones por accidentes de tránsito tras el consumo de alcohol y cannabis en uno de los países del Cono Sur (Argentina, Chile y Uruguay). Estos resultados ponen de relieve la urgente necesidad de aplicar y hacer cumplir medidas integrales de control del alcohol. Además, dada la tendencia mundial hacia la legalización del cannabis para consumo recreativo, nuestros resultados también podrían orientar a los responsables de las políticas para que promulguen o enmienden las leyes sobre la conducción con capacidades alteradas debido al consumo de sustancias.

RESUMO Objetivo. Relatar o risco de lesões não fatais no trânsito atribuível ao álcool, à cannabis e a seu uso combinado para motoristas, passageiros e pedestres. Métodos. O risco foi estimado usando o método clínico cruzado (case-crossover). Os participantes (N=306) eram feridos atendidos em um pronto-socorro em Mar del Plata, Argentina. Resultados. O uso de álcool (OR = 6,78, IC95% 3,75; 12,25) e o uso combinado de álcool e cannabis (OR= 7,05, IC95% 1,16; 42,73) aumentaram significativamente o risco de lesões no trânsito. O uso de álcool aumentou o risco tanto em mulheres (OR = 8,87, IC95% 2,69; 29,21) quanto em homens (OR = 6,16, IC95% 3,10; 12,23); naqueles >30 anos de idade (OR = 6,01, IC95% 2,09; 17,24) e <30 anos de idade (OR = 7,15, IC95% 3,49; 14,65). Esse último grupo também apresentou um risco maior após o uso combinado de álcool e cannabis (OR = 7,05, IC95% 1,16; 42,75). Tanto motoristas (OR = 6,40, IC95% 3,23; 12,69) quanto passageiros (OR = 13,83, IC95% 2,87; 66,42) apresentaram risco maior após o consumo de álcool. Conclusões. Até onde sabemos, estas são as primeiras estimativas do risco de lesões de trânsito após o consumo de álcool e cannabis em um dos países do Cone Sul (Argentina, Chile e Uruguai). Os resultados destacam a necessidade urgente de implementar e aplicar medidas abrangentes de controle do álcool. Além disso, considerando a tendência global de legalização da cannabis para uso recreativo, nossos resultados também poderiam ajudar os formuladores de políticas a decretar ou alterar as leis sobre a condução sob efeito de substâncias psicoativas.