RESUMEN
Urinary diversion following radical cystectomy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the gold standard for the management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Urinary diversions are at an increased risk of urolithiasis as a result of various factors. Traditional surgical intervention has included open cystolithotomy which has given way to minimally invasive techniques as of late. We describe a case of a robotic-assisted cystolithotomy from a neobladder in a 54-year-old female patient with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. This is the first description of a robotic-assisted removal of a stone in an orthotopic neobladder. This approach has many advantages, especially in the removal of larger stones. Further study is needed to investigate the efficacy and success of this approach.
RESUMEN
Ureteroiliac artery fistulas are a rare, life-threatening condition that requires a high index of suspicion for prompt diagnosis. Presurgical diagnosis is challenging as this condition can lie hidden despite advanced imaging modalities. We present two cases of patients presenting with gross hematuria and exsanguination in the setting of a ureteroiliac artery fistula. These cases highlight the difficulties in timely diagnosis and treatment in a multidisciplinary team.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Mixed evidence exists regarding the effects of statins among men with prostate cancer. We aimed to determine the association between statin use and clinical outcomes in prostate cancer using systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: Original articles published until second week of August 2015 were searched in electronic databases (Medline-Ovid, Pubmed, Scopus, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ProQuest) for studies on statin use in prostate cancer. The main clinical outcomes for the review were: biochemical recurrence (BCR), metastases, and all-cause and prostate cancer-specific mortality. Meta-analysis was performed to calculate the pooled hazard ratio (pHR) and their 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Heterogeneity between the studies was examined using I(2) statistics. Meta-regression was performed, wherever significant heterogeneity was found in the meta-analyses, to find factors associated with poor outcomes, and sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of findings. The analyses were conducted using RevMan v5.3, STATA v14, and R v3.1.1. RESULTS: Out of the 1002 retrieved citations, 34 observational cohort studies met the inclusion criteria. Statin use was associated with a 21% reduction in the risk of BCR among those treated with radiation therapy (pHR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.65, 0.95, P-value=0.01, 10 studies, I(2)=54%), whereas it was not associated with the BCR among those treated with radical prostatectomy (pHR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.81, 1.09, P-value=0.43, 15 studies, I(2)=65%). Statin use was associated with a 22% reduction in the risk of metastases (pHR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.68, 0.87, P-value<0.001, 6 studies, I(2)=0%), and a 24% reduction in risk of both all-cause mortality (pHR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.63, 0.91, P-value=0.004, 6 studies, I(2)=71%), and prostate cancer-specific mortality (pHR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.64, 0.89, P-value=0.0007, 5 studies, I(2)=40%). CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review found that statin significantly reduced the all-cause and prostate cancer-specific mortality and improved the BCR in certain subgroup of men with prostate cancer. In future, randomized controlled trials should be conducted to establish efficacy of statins among men with prostate cancer.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de la Próstata/epidemiología , Biomarcadores de Tumor , Causas de Muerte , Terapia Combinada , Humanos , Masculino , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Evaluación del Resultado de la Atención al Paciente , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Neoplasias de la Próstata/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Conflicting evidence exists regarding the beneficial effects of metformin in prostate cancer. To determine the association between metformin and clinical outcomes in prostate cancer using systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: Original articles published in English until third week of July, 2014 were searched in electronic databases (Medline-Ovid, Scopus, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ProQuest) for studies on metformin use in prostate cancer. The clinical outcomes assessed were: development of biochemical recurrence, metastases or castration-resistant metastatic cancer, all-cause and prostate cancer-specific mortality. Meta-analysis was performed to calculate the pooled hazard ratio (pHR) and their 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Heterogeneity between the studies was examined using I2 statistics. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the robustness of findings and publication bias was assessed by the Egger's regression asymmetry test and contour plot. RESULTS: Out of 230 retrieved citations, eight retrospective cohort studies and one nested-case-control study met the inclusion criteria. Metformin use was marginally associated with reduction in the risk of biochemical recurrence (pHR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.67, 1.01, P-value=0.06, I2=25%, five studies). Metformin use was not significantly associated with metastases (pHR: 0.59, 95% 0.30-1.18, P-value=0.14, I2=74%, three studies), all-cause mortality (pHR: 0.86; 95% CI, 0.67, 1.10, P-value=0.23, I2: 73%, six studies) and prostate cancer-specific mortality (pHR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.43, 1.33, P-value = 0.33, I2=60%, four studies). Pooled estimates for all outcomes varied in sensitivity analysis by diabetes status and primary treatment of prostate cancer. Systematic review revealed mixed findings on metformin use and the risk of CRPC. CONCLUSIONS: Metformin may reduce the risk of biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer. Given the potential of selection bias in the observational studies, randomized trials should be designed to assess the efficacy of metformin use in prostate cancer.