RESUMEN
Pancreaticobiliary diseases are the important causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Among the imaging modalities, Transabdominal ultrasound (TUS) is cheap, available, and noninvasive but it has some limitations. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is invasive but it has some diagnostic and therapeutic advantages over TUS. This study was aimed to see the diagnostic yields of EUS and TUS in the pancreatobiliary diseases. This cross sectional study was conducted in Sir Salimullah Medical College Mitford Hospital (SSMC&MH), Dhaka, Bangladesh from March 2017 to February 2019. All (n=222) patients were evaluated clinically and with relevant investigations. TUS and EUS were done in all patients. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was done in 60 patients. Among 222 patients 56.8% were males; mean age was 46±16 years; the main presenting symptoms were abdominal pain and jaundice. In diseases of biliary tree, EUS showed dilated CBD alone or in combination with stone in 50 and 67 cases and TUS showed 37, 63 patients respectively. The difference between the findings of EUS and TUS was statistically significant (p=0.00). In gall bladder, EUS found microlithiasis in 6(2.6%) and sludges in 24(10.8%) cases whereas TUS found microlithiasis in 1(0.5%) and sludges in 17(7.7%) cases respectively (p=0.00). Both EUS and TUS detected cholelithiasis in equal number of patients 46(20.3%). On pancreatic evaluation, EUS and TUS detected pancreatic parenchymal abnormalities in 24(10.8%) and 12(5.5%) patients respectively with significant p value (0.00). In cases of pancreatic and cholangiocarcinoma the difference between the findings of EUS and TUS were statistically significant (p<0.05). EUS detected 7 cases of ampullary/peri-ampullary neoplasms whereas TUS detected only 2 cases. The sensitivity of EUS for detecting CBD dilatation, CBD stones, CBD SOL and pancreatic SOL was 85%, 91%, 93%, and 92% respectively. The sensitivity of TUS for detecting CBD dilatation, CBD stones, CBD SOL and pancreatic SOL was 42%, 52%, 40%, and 37% respectively. EUS is more sensitive than TUS in diagnosing pancreaticobiliary disorders. It is of paramount importance in patients in diagnosing CBD dilatation, choledocholithiasis, biliary microlithiasis and pancreaticobiliary neoplasm. EUS has important role before proceeding to further management by more invasive techniques like ERCP or surgery.
Asunto(s)
Coledocolitiasis , Adulto , Bangladesh , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Coledocolitiasis/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Transversales , Endosonografía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
Gastroesophageal reflux disease is widely reported most prevalent disease of the gastrointestinal tract. The burden of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is increasing in Asia and the majority of patients have non-erosive reflux disease. This prospective, open label, non random (consecutive), experimental study was performed due to compare the therapeutic efficacy of alginate and omeprazole in relieving symptoms of non erosive reflux disease (NERD) and was carried out in the Outpatient Department of Gastroenterology, Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh from December 2013 to May 2014. Sixty patients were enrolled for this study and were divided into two groups. Among them, 30 subjects were assigned to the omeprazole group (Group I) and 30 subjects to the alginate group (Group II). Omeprazole 20mg enteric coated capsule daily and alginate 10ml three times daily were administered 14 days in this study. In ITT analysis, achieving complete symptom relief (heart burn) was 56.7% in alginate group & 60% in omeprazole group. Statistically which was not significant (p=0.793). In PP analysis, this was 65.4% and 66.7% respectively. In this study, the overall satisfaction of omeprazole & alginate was more than 86% and the mean duration of heart burn free was found 5.0±4.0 days in Group I and 3.65±2.8 days in Group II. The difference was not statistically (p>0.05) significant between two groups in this study. Therapeutic efficacy and safety profiles of alginate were comparable to omeprazole after two weeks treatment in NERD subjects. So alginate may be considered as a relevant and effective alternative medication in non-erosive reflux.