Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod ; 52(6): 102598, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37087045

RESUMEN

Cesarean delivery rates have been steadily rising since the beginning of the 21st century. The growing incidence is even more prominent in developing countries owing to lack of evidence-based guidance and audit, and the expansion of private practice. The uprise in Cesarean delivery rate has been associated with considerable financial burden and has increased the risk otherwise uncommon serious complications such as placenta accreta disorders and uterine rupture. In addition to primary prevention of Cesarean delivery, trial of labor after cesarean section is one of the most successful strategies to reduce Cesarean deliveries and minimize risks associated with higher order Cesarean deliveries. This guideline appraises patient selection strategies and use of prediction model to promote counseling and enhance safety in women considering vaginal birth after Cesarean.


Asunto(s)
Cesárea , Parto Vaginal Después de Cesárea , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Esfuerzo de Parto , Ginecólogos , Obstetras
2.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 35(25): 7280-7289, 2022 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34470117

RESUMEN

Since the 50 s of the last century, labor charts have been proposed and appraised as a tool to diagnose labor abnormalities and guide decision-making. The partogram, the most widely adopted form of labor charts, has been endorsed by the world health organization (WHO) since 1994. Nevertheless, recent studies and systematic reviews did not support clinical significance of application of the WHO partogram. These results have led to further studies that investigate modifications to the structure of the partogram, or more recently, to reconstruct new labor charts to improve their clinical efficacy. This guideline appraises current evidence on use of labor charts in management of labor specially in low-resource settings.


Asunto(s)
Trabajo de Parto , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Educación de Postgrado , Medio Oriente
3.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 158(2): 424-431, 2022 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34674270

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To validate the use of placenta accreta risk-antepartum (PAR-A) score as a predictive tool of clinical outcomes of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS). METHODS: This is a prospective study, conducted in six PAS specialized centers in six different countries. The study was conducted between October 1, 2020 and March 31, 2021. Women who were provisionally diagnosed with PAS during pregnancy were considered eligible. A machine-learning-based PAR-A score was calculated. Diagnostic performance of the PAR-A score was evaluated using a receiver operating characteristic curve, for perioperative massive blood loss and admission to intensive care unit (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04525001). RESULTS: Of 97 eligible women, 86 were included. PAS-associated massive blood loss occurred in 10 patients (11.63%). Median PAR-A scores of massive blood loss in the current cohort were 8.9 (interquartile range 6.9-14.1). In predicting massive blood loss, the area under the curve of PAR-A scores was 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-0.95), which was not significantly different from the original cohort (P = 0.2). PAR-A score prediction of intensive care unit admission was slightly higher compared with the original cohort (0.88, 95% CI 0.81-0.95; P = 0.06). CONCLUSION: PAR-A score is a novel scoring system of PAS outcomes, which showed external validity based on current data.


Asunto(s)
Placenta Accreta , Placenta Previa , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Placenta , Placenta Accreta/diagnóstico , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
4.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 35(25): 5087-5098, 2022 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33627019

RESUMEN

Rectovaginal colonization with group B streptococcus (GBS) is commonly encountered in pregnancy. GBS is the most common cause of early onset neonatal sepsis, which is associated with 12% case-fatality rate. Although screening protocols and prophylactic treatment are readily available worldwide, practice in low-resource countries is challenged by lack of awareness and limited implementation of these protocols. In addition, antibiotic susceptibility pattern may vary globally owing to different regulations of antibiotic prescription or prevalence of certain bacterial serotypes. This guideline appraises current evidence on screening and management of GBS colonization in pregnancy particularly in low-resource settings.


Asunto(s)
Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo , Infecciones Estreptocócicas , Embarazo , Recién Nacido , Femenino , Humanos , Transmisión Vertical de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/prevención & control , Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Streptococcus agalactiae , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/prevención & control , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Educación de Postgrado
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA