RESUMEN
Prediction of disease progression is challenging in multiple sclerosis as the sequence of lesion development and retention of inflammation within a subset of chronic lesions is heterogeneous among patients. We investigated the sequence of lesion-related regional structural disconnectivity across the spectrum of disability and cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. In a full cohort of 482 multiple sclerosis patients (age: 41.83 ± 11.63 years, 71.57% females), the Expanded Disability Status Scale was used to classify patients into (i) no or mild (Expanded Disability Status Scale <3) versus (ii) moderate or severe disability groups (Expanded Disability Status Scale ≥3). In 363 out of 482 patients, quantitative susceptibility mapping was used to identify paramagnetic rim lesions, which are maintained by a rim of iron-laden innate immune cells. In 171 out of 482 patients, Brief International Cognitive Assessment was used to identify subjects as being cognitively preserved or impaired. Network Modification Tool was used to estimate the regional structural disconnectivity due to multiple sclerosis lesions. Discriminative event-based modelling was applied to investigate the sequence of regional structural disconnectivity due to (i) all representative T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery lesions, (ii) paramagnetic rim lesions versus non-paramagnetic rim lesions separately across disability groups ('no to mild disability' to 'moderate to severe disability'), (iii) all representative T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery lesions and (iv) paramagnetic rim lesions versus non-paramagnetic rim lesions separately across cognitive status ('cognitively preserved' to 'cognitively impaired'). In the full cohort, structural disconnection in the ventral attention and subcortical networks, particularly in the supramarginal and putamen regions, was an early biomarker of moderate or severe disability. The earliest biomarkers of disability progression were structural disconnections due to paramagnetic rim lesions in the motor-related regions. Subcortical structural disconnection, particularly in the ventral diencephalon and thalamus regions, was an early biomarker of cognitive impairment. Our data-driven model revealed that the structural disconnection in the subcortical regions, particularly in the thalamus, is an early biomarker for both disability and cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Paramagnetic rim lesions-related structural disconnection in the motor cortex may identify the patients at risk for moderate or severe disability in multiple sclerosis. Such information might be used to identify people with multiple sclerosis who have an increased risk of disability progression or cognitive decline in order to provide personalized treatment plans.
RESUMEN
Objective: Prediction of disease progression is challenging in multiple sclerosis (MS) as the sequence of lesion development and retention of inflammation within a subset of chronic lesions is heterogeneous among patients. We investigated the sequence of lesion-related regional structural disconnectivity across the spectrum of disability and cognitive impairment in MS. Methods: In a full cohort of 482 patients, the Expanded Disability Status Scale was used to classify patients into (i) no or mild vs (ii) moderate or severe disability groups. In 363 out of 482 patients, Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping was used to identify paramagnetic rim lesions (PRL), which are maintained by a rim of iron-laden innate immune cells. In 171 out of 482 patients, Brief International Cognitive Assessment was used to identify subjects with cognitive impairment. Network Modification Tool was used to estimate the regional structural disconnectivity due to MS lesions. Discriminative event-based modeling was applied to investigate the sequence of regional structural disconnectivity due to all representative lesions across the spectrum of disability and cognitive impairment. Results: Structural disconnection in the ventral attention and subcortical networks was an early biomarker of moderate or severe disability. The earliest biomarkers of disability progression were structural disconnections due to PRL in the motor-related regions. Subcortical structural disconnection was an early biomarker of cognitive impairment. Interpretation: MS lesion-related structural disconnections in the subcortex is an early biomarker for both disability and cognitive impairment in MS. PRL-related structural disconnection in the motor cortex may identify the patients at risk for moderate or severe disability in MS.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: People living with multiple sclerosis (MS) and other disorders treated with immunomodulatory therapies remain concerned about suboptimal responses to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines. Important questions persist regarding immunological response to third vaccines, particularly with respect to newer virus variants. The objective of this study is to evaluate humoral and cellular immune responses to a third COVID-19 vaccine dose in people on anti-CD20 therapy and sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) modulators, including Omicron-specific assays. METHODS: This is an observational study evaluating immunological responses to third COVID-19 vaccine dose in participants treated with anti-CD20 agents, S1PR modulators, and healthy controls. Neutralizing antibodies against USA-WA1/2020 (WA1) and B.1.1.529 (BA.1) severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) were measured before and after third vaccine. Groups were compared by one-way ANOVA with Tukey multiple comparisons. Cellular responses to spike peptide pools generated from WA1 and BA.1 were evaluated. Pre-post comparisons were made by Wilcoxon paired t-tests, inter-cohort comparisons by Mann-Whitney t-test. RESULTS: This cohort includes 25 participants on anti-CD20 therapy, 12 on S1PR modulators, and 14 healthy controls. Among those on anti-CD20 therapy, neutralizing antibodies to WA1 were significantly reduced compared to healthy controls (ID50% GM post-vaccination of 8.1 ± 2.8 in anti-CD20 therapy group vs 452.6 ± 8.442 healthy controls, P < 0.0001) and neutralizing antibodies to BA.1 were below the threshold of detection nearly universally. However, cellular responses, including to Omicron-specific peptides, were not significantly different from controls. Among those on S1PR modulators, neutralizing antibodies to WA1 were detected in a minority, and only 3/12 had neutralizing antibodies just at the limit of detection to BA.1. Cellular responses to Spike antigen in those on S1PR modulators were reduced by a factor of 100 compared to controls (median 0.0008% vs. 0.08%, p < 0.001) and were not significantly "boosted" by a third injection. CONCLUSIONS: Participants on anti-CD20 and S1PR modulator therapies had impaired antibody neutralization capacity, particularly to BA.1, even after a third vaccine. T cell responses were not affected by anti-CD20 therapies, but were nearly abrogated by S1PR modulators. These results have clinical implications warranting further study.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Humanos , Esfingosina , SARS-CoV-2 , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes , Anticuerpos Antivirales , VacunaciónRESUMEN
Importance: People living with multiple sclerosis (MS) and other disorders treated with immunomodulatory therapies remain concerned about suboptimal responses to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines. Important questions persist regarding immunological response to third vaccines, particularly with respect to newer virus variants. Objective: Evaluate humoral and cellular immune responses to third COVID-19 vaccine dose in people on anti-CD20 therapy and sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) modulators, including Omicron-specific assays. Design: Observational study evaluating immunological response to third COVID-19 vaccine dose in volunteers treated with anti-CD20 agents, S1PR modulators, and healthy controls. Neutralizing antibodies against USA-WA1/2020 (WA1) and B.1.1.529 (BA.1) severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) were measured before and after third vaccine. Cellular responses to spike peptide pools generated from WA1 and BA.1 were evaluated. Setting: Mount Sinai Hospital. Participants: People treated with anti-CD20 therapy or S1PR modulators and healthy volunteers. Exposure: Treatment with anti-CD20 therapy, S1PR modulator, or neither. Main outcomes and measures: Serum neutralizing antibodies and ex vivo T cell responses against SARS-CoV-2 antigens. Results: This cohort includes 25 participants on anti-CD20 therapy, 12 on S1PR modulators, and 14 healthy controls. Among those on anti-CD20 therapy, neutralizing antibodies to WA1 were significantly reduced compared to healthy controls (ID50% GM post-vaccination of 8.1 ± 2.8 in anti-CD20 therapy group vs 452.6 ± 8.442 healthy controls, P<0.0001) and neutralizing antibodies to BA.1 were below the threshold of detection nearly universally. However, cellular responses, including to Omicron-specific peptides, were not significantly different from controls. Among those on S1PR modulators, neutralizing antibodies to WA1 were detected in a minority, and only 3/12 had neutralizing antibodies just at the limit of detection to BA.1. Cellular responses to Spike antigen in those on S1PR modulators were reduced by a factor of 100 compared to controls (median 0.0008% vs. 0.08%, p<0.001) and were not significantly "boosted" by a third injection. Conclusions and Relevance: Participants on immunomodulators had impaired antibody neutralization capacity, particularly to BA.1, even after a third vaccine. T cell responses were not affected by anti-CD20 therapies, but were nearly abrogated by S1PR modulators. These results have clinical implications warranting further study.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Prior studies suggest reduced humoral response to COVID-19 vaccination in immunosuppressed populations. Disease modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS) have variable immunomodulatory effects, and limited data are available for all DMTs. We aimed to determine the impact of DMTs on antibody response to COVID-19 vaccination among MS patients. METHODS: Patients with documented COVID-19 vaccination dates and anti-spike antibody results post-vaccination were identified between March-August 2021. Clinical data were retrospectively abstracted from chart review. Deidentified data were analyzed to evaluate antibody response, and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify clinical and demographic predictors of antibody response. Data analysis was completed with SAS Studio, v3.8. RESULTS: A total of 353 individuals had documented COVID-19 vaccine and antibody test dates (58% Pfizer, 38% Moderna, and 4% Johnson & Johnson). Of these 353 patients, 72% developed antibodies, with a mean antibody test interval of 53 days (median 46) post final vaccine dose. 100% of those on no DMT (n = 34), injectables (n = 20), teriflunomide (n = 10), natalizumab (n = 71), and 97.8% of those on fumarates (n = 46/47) had a positive antibody result. One patient on cladribine (n = 1) had a negative antibody result. Of those on sphingosine-1 phosphate (S1P) modulators, 72.4% (n = 21/29) had a positive antibody result. Of those on anti-CD20 therapies, 37.6% (n = 53/141) had a positive antibody result. Multivariate modeling of the total cohort showed anti-CD20 therapy was significantly associated with lower odds of positive antibody response (OR = 0.024, 95% CI 0.01;0.05, p < 0.0001). Among S1P modulators, increased duration of therapy, and not lymphopenia, may be associated with lower odds of positive antibody response. Multivariate modeling of anti-CD20 therapies showed therapy duration < 1 year (OR 8.14, 95% CI 2.896;22.898 p < .0001) and prior COVID-19 infection (OR = 3.95, 95% CI 1.137;13.726, p = .03) were significantly associated with higher odds of a positive antibody response. In patients with recent B-cell data, mean B-cell count was higher in antibody-positive individuals compared to antibody-negative (32.9 vs. 3.9 cells, p = .0056). CONCLUSION: MS DMTs had variable impact on antibody response with mRNA and viral vector COVID-19 vaccines. All patients on no DMT, interferons, glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide, natalizumab, and nearly all on fumarates had positive antibody responses post-vaccine. S1P modulators and anti-CD20 therapies attenuated antibody response post-vaccine. For patients on anti-CD20 therapies, shorter duration of therapy and prior COVID-19 infection predicted positive antibody response. Further studies are needed to determine clinical significance of antibody testing, development of cellular mediated immunity, and benefits of booster vaccinations.