RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of displacement patterns of the molar teeth in response to different asymmetric headgear loading using 3D finite element method. METHODS: A series of twenty-five facebow with different left vs. right outer bow length and different expansion of left vs. right were designed. The non-favored side (right side) was shortened at intervals of 10 mm, and favored side (left side) was expanded 10 degree greater than right side and 5 degree expansion were successively added. At the first phase, each side received 200-g load, implying the neck strap to displace toward shorter arm. At the second phase, a total of 400-g load was applied to the ends of the outer bow. Because of the neck strap displacement, the shorter arm received greater load than the left side, the magnitude of the applied force to each side depended on difference of left vs. right outer bow length and expansion. RESULTS: All systems were effective in promoting asymmetric distal movement of the molars. However, the asymmetrical facebow with the 40 mm shortening and 25 degree expansion outer bow when unequal force applied could be used in asymmetric mechanics. Medial and occlusal displacing forces were observed in all systems. CONCLUSIONS: Both equal and unequal force application is effective for molar distalization. Expansion of the outer bow in the affected side and shortening of the outer bow in the normal side were effective to produced differential distal molar movement.
Asunto(s)
Aparatos de Tracción Extraoral , Diseño de Aparato Ortodóncico , Análisis del Estrés Dental , Análisis de Elementos Finitos , Diente Molar , Técnicas de Movimiento DentalRESUMEN
Abstract Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of displacement patterns of the molar teeth in response to different asymmetric headgear loading using 3D finite element method. Methods: A series of twenty-five facebow with different left vs. right outer bow length and different expansion of left vs. right were designed. The non-favored side (right side) was shortened at intervals of 10 mm, and favored side (left side) was expanded 10 degree greater than right side and 5 degree expansion were successively added. At the first phase, each side received 200-g load, implying the neck strap to displace toward shorter arm. At the second phase, a total of 400-g load was applied to the ends of the outer bow. Because of the neck strap displacement, the shorter arm received greater load than the left side, the magnitude of the applied force to each side depended on difference of left vs. right outer bow length and expansion. Results: All systems were effective in promoting asymmetric distal movement of the molars. However, the asymmetrical facebow with the 40 mm shortening and 25 degree expansion outer bow when unequal force applied could be used in asymmetric mechanics. Medial and occlusal displacing forces were observed in all systems. Conclusions: Both equal and unequal force application is effective for molar distalization. Expansion of the outer bow in the affected side and shortening of the outer bow in the normal side were effective to produced differential distal molar movement.
Resumo Objetivo: o objetivo desse estudo foi usar o método de elementos finitos 3D para avaliar o efeito no padrão de deslocamento dos molares em resposta ao uso de aparelhos extrabucais com diferentes forças assimétricas. Métodos: foram confeccionados 25 aparelhos extrabucais (AEB) com diferenças, entre os lados direito e esquerdo, quanto ao comprimento e ao grau de abertura do braço externo. O lado não favorecido (lado direito) foi encurtado em intervalos de 10 mm e o lado favorecido (lado esquerdo) foi aberto 10 graus a mais do que o lado direito, sendo adicionados 5 graus de abertura sucessivamente. Na primeira fase, cada lado recebeu carga de 200 g, causando o deslocamento da tala cervical em direção ao braço mais curto. Na segunda fase, foi aplicada carga total de 400 g às extremidades dos braços externos dos AEB. Devido ao deslocamento da tala cervical, o braço mais curto recebeu uma força maior do que o lado oposto; a magnitude da força aplicada em cada lado dependeu da diferença no comprimento e na abertura dos braços externos do AEB. Resultados: todos os sistemas foram efetivos em promover movimentação distal assimétrica dos molares. Porém, o AEB assimétrico com 40 mm de encurtamento e 25 graus de abertura do braço externo poderia ser usado na mecânica assimétrica, com aplicação diferenciada de força. Foram observadas forças mediais e oclusais de deslocamento em todos os sistemas. Conclusões: tanto a aplicação de forças simétricas quanto assimétricas são efetivas para a distalização dos molares. A expansão do braço externo do AEB no lado afetado e o encurtamento no lado normal foram efetivos na produção de movimento distal assimétrico dos molares.