RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a progressive multisystem disorder following an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern that presents with multiple neurological manifestations. METHODS: We reviewed medical histories of patients with NF1 followed up at our hospital's paediatric neurology department from May 1990 to 31 December 2018. We collected data on neurological symptoms. RESULTS: A total of 128 patients with NF1 were identified. Mean age (SD) at NF1 diagnosis was 4.43 (3.38) years (range, 0.5-14.5 years). There was a slight female predominance (53.1%). Macrocephaly (head circumference over 2 SDs above average for age) was present in 37.5% of cases. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder was recorded in 28.9% of patients (37): combined type in 20 patients, predominantly inattentive in 15, and predominantly impulsive/hyperactive in 2. Other manifestations included headache (18.6%), cognitive impairment (7.8%), motor deficit (6.2%), and epilepsy (4.68%). Brain MRI was performed in 85 patients, revealing T2-weighted hyperintensities in the basal ganglia and/or cerebellum in 60 patients (70.5%), Chiari malformation type 1 in 4 cases, and arachnoid cysts in 3. Optic nerve gliomas were identified by MRI in 22 patients (25.8%). Other MRI findings included plexiform neurofibromas (9.3%) and central nervous system gliomas (3.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The neurological manifestations identified in our sample are consistent with those reported in the literature. Effective transfer strategies from paediatric neurology departments and subsequent clinical follow-up by adult neurology departments are needed to prevent loss to follow-up in adulthood.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Introducción: La neurofibromatosis tipo 1 (NF1) es un desorden progresivo multisistémico de herencia autosómica dominante que presenta numerosas manifestaciones neurológicas. Métodos: Revisión de historias clínicas de pacientes afectos de NF1 controlados en una Unidad de Neuropediatría de mayo de 1990 a 31 de diciembre de 2018 y sus manifestaciones neurológicas asociadas. Resultados: Se revisaron 128 pacientes afectos de NF1. Edad media al diagnóstico de NF1, 4,43 años ± 3,38 SDS (rango 6 meses-14,5 años) con discreto predominio femenino (53,1%). Se asocia macrocefalia (PC> 2SDS) en el 37,5% de los casos. TDAH en el 28,9% de los casos (37), subtipo combinado 20, inatento 15 casos y predominantemente hiperactivo 2 casos. Otras manifestaciones incluyen; cefalea (18,7%), déficit cognitivo (7,8%), afectación motora (6,2%) y epilepsia (4,68%). Se realizó RM cerebral a 85 pacientes, mostrando 60 (70,5%) hiperseñales en T2 en ganglios basales y/o cerebelo, junto con otras alteraciones como Chiari I (4 casos) y quistes aracnoideos (3 casos). Se identificaron gliomas de nervio óptico en 22 casos (25,8%). Otros hallazgos diagnosticados por RM incluyen neurofibromas plexiformes (9,3%) y otros gliomas localizados en sistema nervioso central (3,1%). Conclusiones: Las manifestaciones neurológicas encontradas concuerdan con lo recogido en la literatura. El seguimiento de estos pacientes se pierde en la edad adulta, siendo necesario establecer adecuadas estrategias de transferencia y posterior seguimiento de pacientes a los servicios de adultos. (AU)

Introduction: Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a progressive multisystem disorder following an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern that presents with multiple neurological manifestations. Methods: We reviewed medical histories of patients with NF1 followed up at our hospital's paediatric neurology department from May 1990 to 31 December 2018. We collected data on neurological symptoms. Results: A total of 128 patients with NF1 were identified. Mean age (SD) at NF1 diagnosis was 4.43 (3.38) years (range, 0.5-14.5 years). There was a slight female predominance (53.1%). Macrocephaly (head circumference over 2 SDs above average for age) was present in 37.5% of cases. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder was recorded in 28.9% of patients (37): combined type in 20 patients, predominantly inattentive in 15, and predominantly impulsive/hyperactive in 2. Other manifestations included headache (18.6%), cognitive impairment (7.8%), motor deficit (6.2%), and epilepsy (4.68%). Brain MRI was performed in 85 patients, revealing T2-weighted hyperintensities in the basal ganglia and/or cerebellum in 60 patients (70.5%), Chiari malformation type 1 in 4 cases, and arachnoid cysts in 3. Optic nerve gliomas were identified by MRI in 22 patients (25.8%). Other MRI findings included plexiform neurofibromas (9.3%) and central nervous system gliomas (3.1%). Conclusions: The neurological manifestations identified in our sample are consistent with those reported in the literature. Effective transfer strategies from paediatric neurology departments and subsequent clinical follow-up by adult neurology departments are needed to prevent loss to follow-up in adulthood. (AU)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Introducción y objetivos: Se presenta nuestra experiencia en neuritis óptica (ON) y se elabora un protocolo diagnóstico-terapéutico, que contempla descartar otras causas, principalmente infecciosas y se elabora una hoja informativa para padres.Material y métodoEstudio descriptivo retrospectivo de los pacientes con ON en 27 años (1990-2017). Revisión de evidencia científica para elaboración del protocolo y hoja informativa.ResultadosEn nuestra sección de neuropediatría se valoraron 20.744 niños en 27 años, 14 con ON: 8 ON aisladas, una esclerosis múltiple (EM), un episodio clínicamente aislado (CIS), 3 encefalomielitis agudas diseminadas y un paciente con ON aislada que el año anterior había sufrido una encefalomielitis aguda diseminada. Edades entre 4-13 años, 50% varones. Mayores de 10 años, 8 pacientes: 7 ON aisladas y un EM. Bilaterales 9, retrobulbares 3. Resonancia magnética cerebral normal en 7, solo afectación del nervio óptico en 2 y con desmielinización del SNC en 5 casos. Recibieron corticoterapia 13/14. Un caso vacunado de meningococo-C el mes anterior. Todos evolucionaron favorablemente, salvo la EM. Se presentan el protocolo y la hoja de información.ConclusionesHabitual curso favorable. En niños a partir de 10 años, con factores de riesgo de desarrollar EM o neuromielitis óptica (presencia de hiperseñales en RM cerebral, bandas oligoclonales, anti-NMO, recurrencia de ON), se consensúa con Neurología el inicio de tratamiento inmunomodulador. Utilidad del protocolo para la toma de decisiones diagnósticas, de seguimiento y tratamiento, de una patología poco frecuente pero con posibles repercusiones importantes. Importancia de la protocolización y hojas informativas. (AU)

Introduction and objective: In this article, we present our experience on optic neuritis (ON) and provide a diagnostic/therapeutic protocol, intended to rule out other aetiologies (particularly infection), and a fact sheet for parents.Material and methodsWe conducted a descriptive, retrospective study of patients with ON over a 27-year period (1990-2017). A review of the available scientific evidence was performed in order to draft the protocol and fact sheet.ResultsOur neuropaediatrics department has assessed 20,744 patients in the last 27 years, of whom 14 were diagnosed with ON: 8 had isolated ON, 1 had multiple sclerosis (MS), 1 had clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), 3 had acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, and 1 had isolated ON and a history of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis one year previously. Patients’ age range was 4-13 years; 50% were boys. Eight patients were aged over 10: 7 had isolated ON and 1 had MS. Nine patients had bilateral ON, and 3 had retrobulbar ON. MRI results were normal in 7 patients and showed involvement of the optic nerve only in 2 patients and optic nerve involvement + central nervous system demyelination in 5. Thirteen patients received corticosteroids. One patient had been vaccinated against meningococcus-C the previous month. Progression was favourable, except in the patient with MS. A management protocol and fact sheet are provided.ConclusionsON usually has a favourable clinical course. In children aged older than 10 years with risk factors for MS or optic neuromyelitis (hyperintensity on brain MRI, oligoclonal bands, anti-NMO antibody positivity, ON recurrence), the initiation of immunomodulatory treatment should be agreed with the neurology department. The protocol is useful for diagnostic decision-making, follow-up, and treatment of this rare disease with potentially major repercussions. The use of protocols and fact sheets is important. (AU)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: In this article, we present our experience on optic neuritis (ON) and provide a diagnostic/therapeutic protocol, intended to rule out other aetiologies (particularly infection), and a fact sheet for parents. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a descriptive, retrospective study of patients with ON over a 27-year period (1990-2017). A review of the available scientific evidence was performed in order to draft the protocol and fact sheet. RESULTS: Our neuropaediatrics department has assessed 20,744 patients in the last 27 years, of whom 14 were diagnosed with ON: 8 had isolated ON, 1 had multiple sclerosis (MS), 1 had clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), 3 had acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, and 1 had isolated ON and a history of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis one year previously. Patients' age range was 4-13 years; 50% were boys. Eight patients were aged over 10: 7 had isolated ON and 1 had MS. Nine patients had bilateral ON, and 3 had retrobulbar ON. MRI results were normal in 7 patients and showed involvement of the optic nerve only in 2 patients and optic nerve involvement + central nervous system demyelination in 5. Thirteen patients received corticosteroids. One patient had been vaccinated against meningococcus-C the previous month. Progression was favourable, except in the patient with MS. A management protocol and fact sheet are provided. CONCLUSIONS: ON usually has a favourable clinical course. In children aged older than 10 years with risk factors for MS or optic neuromyelitis (hyperintensity on brain MRI, oligoclonal bands, anti-NMO antibody positivity, ON recurrence), the initiation of immunomodulatory treatment should be agreed with the neurology department. The protocol is useful for diagnostic decision-making, follow-up, and treatment of this rare disease with potentially major repercussions. The use of protocols and fact sheets is important.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

TITLE: Neurofibromatosis 1 y cavernomatosis multiple familiar en un lactante con sialorrea profusa episodica.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a progressive multisystem disorder following an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern that presents with multiple neurological manifestations. METHODS: We reviewed medical histories of patients with NF1 followed up at our hospital's paediatric neurology department from May 1990 to 31 December 2018. We collected data on neurological symptoms. RESULTS: A total of 128 patients with NF1 were identified. Mean age (SD) at NF1 diagnosis was 4.43 (3.38) years (range, 0.5-14.5 years). There was a slight female predominance (53.1%). Macrocephaly (head circumference over 2 SDs above average for age) was present in 37.5% of cases. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder was recorded in 28.9% of patients (37): combined type in 20 patients, predominantly inattentive in 15, and predominantly impulsive/hyperactive in 2. Other manifestations included headache (18.6%), cognitive impairment (7.8%), motor deficit (6.2%), and epilepsy (4.68%). Brain MRI was performed in 85 patients, revealing T2-weighted hyperintensities in the basal ganglia and/or cerebellum in 60 patients (70.5%), Chiari malformation type 1 in 4 cases, and arachnoid cysts in 3. Optic nerve gliomas were identified by MRI in 22 patients (25.8%). Other MRI findings included plexiform neurofibromas (9.3%) and central nervous system gliomas (3.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The neurological manifestations identified in our sample are consistent with those reported in the literature. Effective transfer strategies from paediatric neurology departments and subsequent clinical follow-up by adult neurology departments are needed to prevent loss to follow-up in adulthood.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) have a high predisposition to develop attention-deficit disorder. The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of NF1 patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) diagnosis attending our Child Neurology Department. We assess patient adherence and medical treatment outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Identification of patients with NF1 being followed up from December 31 2015 to June 31 2017 with ADHD diagnosis. Clinical and treatment data were collected. RESULTS: 56 patients with NF1 were enrolled in the study with a mean age of 9.83 ± 4.17 years. 23 patients (41%) were diagnosed with ADHD, mean age at ADHD diagnosis of 7.53 ± 2.46 years. School-age children with ADHD represented 48.8% of cases. All but one of the children received treatment, mean duration of treatment was 3.85 ± 3.04 years. 19 out of 22 patients (86%) continue medical treatment. Positive effects were reported by eleven patients with a moderate response in eight patients. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of ADHD in patients with NF1 is high. Early diagnosis and treatment of ADHD in patients with NF1 is highlighted by this study. Our study reveals good patient adherence and medical treatment outcomes in most patients.

TITLE: Neurofibromatosis tipo 1 y trastorno por deficit de atencion. Nuestra experiencia actual.Introduccion. Los pacientes con neurofibromatosis de tipo 1 (NF1) tienen una gran predisposicion a desarrollar deficit de atencion. El objetivo del estudio es determinar los pacientes controlados en nuestra seccion de neuropediatria con NF1 y diagnostico de trastorno por deficit de atencion/hiperactividad (TDAH), valorando la adhesion y respuesta al tratamiento. Pacientes y metodos. Se identifica a los pacientes afectos de NF1 que siguen controlados entre el 31 de diciembre de 2015 y el 31 de junio de 2017, y de ellos, los que presentan diagnostico de TDAH, revisando datos clinicos y de tratamiento. Resultados. Se ha controlado a 56 pacientes afectos de NF1, con una edad media de 9,83 ± 4,17 años. De ellos, 23 (41%) presentan diagnostico clinico de TDAH, con una edad media de 7,53 ± 2,46 años en el momento del diagnostico. El 48,8% de los niños en edad escolar esta afecto de TDAH. Todos los pacientes menos uno recibieron tratamiento con estimulantes, con un tiempo medio de tratamiento de 3,85 ± 3,04 años. Continuan con el tratamiento 19 pacientes de los 22 tratados (86%). Once casos refieren una clara mejoria, y ocho, una mejoria moderada. Conclusiones. El TDAH es muy prevalente en niños con NF1. Se destaca la importancia de la identificacion y el tratamiento del TDAH en niños afectos de NF1. Nuestra revision muestra una buena adhesion al tratamiento con estimulantes, con mantenida buena respuesta en la mayor parte de los casos.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Acute cerebellitis is a rare inflammatory disease with a highly variable clinical course that ranges from benign self-limiting symptoms to a fulminant presentation associated with a high risk of death due to compression of the posterior fossa, acute hydrocephalus, and intracranial hypertension. METHODS: We reviewed clinical, laboratory, and radiological findings from children diagnosed with acute cerebellitis between May 2007 and November 2016. We analysed treatments and clinical and radiological progression. RESULTS: Nine children met the diagnostic criteria for cerebellitis. Headache, vomiting, and drowsiness were the most frequent initial symptoms; ataxia, dysarthria, and dysmetria were the most common cerebellar signs. Cerebellitis was diagnosed with magnetic resonance imaging, which revealed cerebellar involvement (unilateral or bilateral); computerised tomography images either were normal or showed indirect signs such as triventricular hydrocephalus due to extrinsic compression of the aqueduct of Sylvius. Corticosteroids were the most commonly used treatment (6 patients). One patient required surgery due to triventricular hydrocephalus. Eight patients recovered completely, whereas the ninth displayed neurological sequelae. CONCLUSIONS: Cerebellitis is a medical and surgical emergency; diagnosis requires a high level of suspicion and an emergency brain magnetic resonance imaging study. It is a clinical-radiological syndrome characterised by acute or subacute encephalopathy with intracranial hypertension and cerebellar syndrome associated with T2-weighted and FLAIR hyperintensities in the cerebellar cortex (unilaterally or bilaterally) and possible triventricular dilatation. Treatment is based on high-dose corticosteroids and may require external ventricular drain placement and decompressive surgery.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Introducción. En la sección de neuropediatría, se trabaja con hojas de información que pretenden explicar de forma rigurosa los problemas y su seguimiento. La de «la epilepsia en la infancia» se entrega cuando existe sospecha o diagnóstico certero de epilepsia. Método. Se analiza, a través de unas encuestas, el grado de satisfacción y las percepciones de los padres o tutores que recibieron dicha hoja. Resultados. 658 pacientes recibieron la hoja de información desde febrero de 2012 hasta diciembre de 2014. La tasa de respuesta es del 56,8%. El 63,10% de los pacientes que recibieron la hoja de información tenían un diagnóstico definitivo de epilepsia. Un 92,7% está satisfecho de haber recibido la hoja. Solo un 0,3% de los pacientes hubiera preferido no recibir la hoja de información. Conclusiones. La mayoría de padres o tutores de los pacientes con sospecha o diagnóstico de epilepsia se mostraron satisfechos por recibir la hoja de información. La hoja de información de «epilepsia en la infancia» mejora la información y la satisfacción percibida y su evaluación para corregir y mejorar, es necesaria en el proceso de mejora que no tiene punto final (AU)

Introduction. In the Pediatric Neurology service, we work with fact sheets that aim to rigorously explain the problems and their follow—up. The «epilepsy in childhood» fact sheet is given when there is suspicion or accurate diagnosis of epilepsy. Methods. The degree of satisfaction and the perceptions of the parents or guardians who received this sheet were analyzed through surveys. Results. 658 patients received the fact sheet from February 2012 to December 2014. The response rate was 56.8%. 63.10% of the patients who received the information sheet had a definitive diagnosis of epilepsy. 92.7% are satisfied to have received the sheet. Only 0.3% of the patients would have preferred not to receive the fact sheet. Conclusion. The majority of parents or guardians of patients with suspected or diagnosed epilepsy were satisfied by receiving the fact sheet. The «epilepsy in childhood» fact sheet improves information and perceived satisfaction, and its evaluation (to correct and improve it) is necessary in the continua] improvement process (AU)

Asunto(s)