RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: to identify the prevalence and predictors of frailty in older people in Primary Health Care. METHOD: this is a descriptive and correlational study, carried out in a convenience sample of 136 older people in the community. Data were collected through a sociodemographic and clinical questionnaire and frailty phenotype. Student's t test or U-Mann-Whitney test, chi-square and binary logistic regression were used for data analysis. RESULTS: the prevalence of frailty was 26.5% (n=36). Frail individuals had older age (p=0.011), worse self-rated health (p=0.001) and lower physical capacity (p<0.001). In the multivariable regression, it was observed that frail individuals had older age (Odds Ratio=1.111; 95% confidence interval=1.026-1.203) and worse physical capacity (Odds Ratio=0.673; 95% confidence interval=0.508-0.893). CONCLUSIONS: the prevalence of frailty in older people in Primary Health Care was considerable. Advanced age and worse physical capacity were the most relevant predictors of frailty in the elderly.
Asunto(s)
Fragilidad , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Anciano Frágil , Fragilidad/epidemiología , Evaluación Geriátrica , Humanos , Atención Primaria de SaludRESUMEN
ABSTRACT Objective: to identify the prevalence and predictors of frailty in older people in Primary Health Care. Method: this is a descriptive and correlational study, carried out in a convenience sample of 136 older people in the community. Data were collected through a sociodemographic and clinical questionnaire and frailty phenotype. Student's t test or U-Mann-Whitney test, chi-square and binary logistic regression were used for data analysis. Results: the prevalence of frailty was 26.5% (n=36). Frail individuals had older age (p=0.011), worse self-rated health (p=0.001) and lower physical capacity (p<0.001). In the multivariable regression, it was observed that frail individuals had older age (Odds Ratio=1.111; 95% confidence interval=1.026-1.203) and worse physical capacity (Odds Ratio=0.673; 95% confidence interval=0.508-0.893). Conclusions: the prevalence of frailty in older people in Primary Health Care was considerable. Advanced age and worse physical capacity were the most relevant predictors of frailty in the elderly.
RESUMEN Objetivo: identificar la prevalencia y predictores de fragilidad en ancianos en Atención Primaria de Salud. Método: estudio descriptivo y correlacional, realizado en una muestra de conveniencia con 136 ancianos de la comunidad. Los datos fueron recolectados a través de un cuestionario sociodemográfico, clínico y de fenotipo de fragilidad. Para el análisis de los datos se utilizaron la prueba t de Student o la prueba U-Mann-Whitney, chi-cuadrado y regresión logística binaria. Resultados: la prevalencia de fragilidad fue del 26,5% (n=36). Los ancianos frágiles eran mayores (p=0,011), peor autoevaluación de la salud (p=0,001) y menos capaces físicamente (p <0,001). En la regresión multivariante, se observó que los ancianos frágiles eran mayores (Odds Ratio=1,111; Intervalo de confianza del 95%=1,026-1,203) y peor capacidad física (Odds Ratio=0,673; Intervalo de confianza del 95%=0,508-0,893). Conclusiones: la prevalencia de fragilidad en ancianos en Atención Primaria de Salud fue considerable. La edad avanzada y la peor capacidad física fueron los predictores más relevantes de fragilidad en el anciano
RESUMO Objetivo: identificar a prevalência e preditores da fragilidade de idosos na Atenção Primária à Saúde. Método: estudo descritivo e correlacional, realizado em amostra de conveniência com 136 idosos na comunidade. Os dados foram coletados através de um questionário sociodemográfico, clínico e pelo fenótipo de fragilidade. Utilizaram-se o teste t de Student ou U-Mann-Whitney, o Qui-Quadrado e a regressão logística binária na análise dos dados. Resultados: a prevalência da fragilidade foi de 26,5% (n=36). Os idosos frágeis apresentaram idade mais avançada (p=0,011), pior autoavaliação de saúde (p=0,001) e menor capacidade física (p<0,001). Na regressão multivariável, observou-se que os idosos frágeis apresentavam idade mais avançada (Odds Ratio=1,111; Intervalo de Confiança 95%=1,026-1,203) e pior capacidade física (Odds Ratio=0,673; Intervalo de Confiança 95%=0,508-0,893). Conclusões: a prevalência da fragilidade nos idosos na Atenção Primária à Saúde foi considerável. A idade avançada e a pior capacidade física foram os preditores mais relevantes da fragilidade nos idosos.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To characterise the degree of disability in pulmonary hypertension (PH) patients based on the World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0). METHOD: A prospective and observational study of patients with documented PH (N = 46). Patients completed the WHODAS 2.0 questionnaire during a scheduled routine clinical visit, and their demographic and clinical characteristics were retrieved from electronic medical records (EMR). In subsequent visits, selected clinical variables were registered to assess disease progression. RESULTS: WHODAS 2.0 scores were indicative of mild to moderate disability for the domains of mobility (22.0 ± 23.2), life activities (23.7 ± 25.5), and participation in society (17.2 ± 15.9), as well as total WHODAS 2.0 score (15.3 ± 15.2). For the domains of cognition (9.1 ± 14.1), self-care (8.3 ± 14.4), and interpersonal relationships (11.7 ± 15.7), scores were lower. Disability scores were, generally, proportional to the PH severity. The main baseline correlates of disability were World Health Organisation (WHO) functional class, fatigue, dyspnoea, 6-minute walking distance (6MWD), and N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP). Baseline WHODAS 2.0 scores showed significant associations with disease progression. However, this effect was not transversal to all domains, with only a few domains significantly associated with disease progression variables. CONCLUSIONS: This PH population shows mild disability, with higher degree of disability in the domains of mobility and life activities. This study is the first one to assess disability in PH using WHODAS 2.0. Further studies should apply this scale to larger PH populations with suitable representations of more severe PH forms.
Asunto(s)
Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Hipertensión Pulmonar/fisiopatología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/normas , Organización Mundial de la Salud , Adulto , Anciano , Análisis de Varianza , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Valores de Referencia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Prueba de PasoRESUMEN
ABSTRACT Objective: To characterise the degree of disability in pulmonary hypertension (PH) patients based on the World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0). Method: A prospective and observational study of patients with documented PH (N = 46). Patients completed the WHODAS 2.0 questionnaire during a scheduled routine clinical visit, and their demographic and clinical characteristics were retrieved from electronic medical records (EMR). In subsequent visits, selected clinical variables were registered to assess disease progression. Results: WHODAS 2.0 scores were indicative of mild to moderate disability for the domains of mobility (22.0 ± 23.2), life activities (23.7 ± 25.5), and participation in society (17.2 ± 15.9), as well as total WHODAS 2.0 score (15.3 ± 15.2). For the domains of cognition (9.1 ± 14.1), self-care (8.3 ± 14.4), and interpersonal relationships (11.7 ± 15.7), scores were lower. Disability scores were, generally, proportional to the PH severity. The main baseline correlates of disability were World Health Organisation (WHO) functional class, fatigue, dyspnoea, 6-minute walking distance (6MWD), and N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP). Baseline WHODAS 2.0 scores showed significant associations with disease progression. However, this effect was not transversal to all domains, with only a few domains significantly associated with disease progression variables. Conclusions: This PH population shows mild disability, with higher degree of disability in the domains of mobility and life activities. This study is the first one to assess disability in PH using WHODAS 2.0. Further studies should apply this scale to larger PH populations with suitable representations of more severe PH forms.
RESUMO Objetivo: Caracterizar o nível de deficiência em pacientes com hipertensão pulmonar (HP) com base no World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0). Método: Estudo prospectivo e observacional em pacientes com HP documentada (N = 46). Os pacientes completaram o questionário WHODAS 2.0 durante uma consulta de rotina, e seus dados demográficos e clínicos foram retirados de prontuários médicos eletrônicos. Nas visitas subsequentes, variáveis clínicas específicas foram registradas para avaliar a progressão da doença. Resultados: a pontuação no WHODAS 2.0 indicaram deficiência leve a moderada para os domínios de mobilidade (22,0 ± 23,2), atividades da vida (23,7 ± 25,5) e participação em sociedade (17,2 ± 15,9), assim como a pontuação total do WHODAS 2.0 (15,3 ± 15,2). Para os domínios de cognição (9,1 ± 14,1), autocuidado (8,3 ± 14,4) e relações interpessoais (11,7 ± 15,7), a pontuação foi mais baixa. Os pontos referentes à deficiência foram, em geral, proporcionais à gravidade da HP. Os principais parâmetros da deficiência foram a classificação de funcionalidade da Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS), fatiga, dispneia, teste de caminhada de 6 minutos (TC6M), e a porção N-terminal do pró-hormônio do peptídeo natriurético do tipo B (NT-proBNP). Os valores de parâmetro do WHODAS 2.0 mostraram associações significativas com a progressão da doença. Porém, este efeito não foi transversal a todos os domínios; apenas alguns estiveram significativamente associados às variáveis da progressão da doença. Conclusão: Esta população com HP mostra deficiência leve, com níveis mais altos nos domínios de mobilidade e atividades da vida diária. Este estudo é o primeiro a avaliar a deficiência em HP usando o WHODAS 2.0. Outros estudos devem aplicar esta escala em populações maiores com HP, com representações de formas mais graves da HP.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Organización Mundial de la Salud , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/normas , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Hipertensión Pulmonar/fisiopatología , Calidad de Vida , Valores de Referencia , Factores Socioeconómicos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Factores de Riesgo , Análisis de Varianza , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Medición de Riesgo , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Prueba de PasoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: to analyze the relationship between the perceptions of nurses about geriatric care (GC) environment and geriatric nurses' knowledge and attitudes according to unit type considering the northern and central regions of Portugal. METHOD: a cross-sectional study was developed among 1068 Portuguese's nurses in five hospitals. The instrument was Geriatric Institutional Assessment Profile - Portuguese version. The independent samples t-test was when the assumption of normality was verified, otherwise, the Mann-Whitney U test was used. The level of significance was 5%. RESULTS: the profile of perceptions of GC showed a relatively homogeneous pattern (no statistically significant results were found). For the geriatric care environment scale, only the CC/ED units presented significant differences in all considered subscales (resource availability; aging-sensitive care; institutional values; and continuity of care), with more positive perceptions among nurses in the northern region. In Professional Issues scales, only the scale perception of burden related with upsetting behaviors revealed significant differences between regions in all specialties. CONCLUSION: the findings suggest the need for increased investment by hospital leaders to promote a geriatric nursing practice environment that supports the specialized needs of hospitalized older adults.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Enfermería Geriátrica , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Hospitalización , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , PortugalRESUMEN
Resume Objective: to analyze the relationship between the perceptions of nurses about geriatric care (GC) environment and geriatric nurses' knowledge and attitudes according to unit type considering the northern and central regions of Portugal. Method: a cross-sectional study was developed among 1068 Portuguese's nurses in five hospitals. The instrument was Geriatric Institutional Assessment Profile - Portuguese version. The independent samples t-test was when the assumption of normality was verified, otherwise, the Mann-Whitney U test was used. The level of significance was 5%. Results: the profile of perceptions of GC showed a relatively homogeneous pattern (no statistically significant results were found). For the geriatric care environment scale, only the CC/ED units presented significant differences in all considered subscales (resource availability; aging-sensitive care; institutional values; and continuity of care), with more positive perceptions among nurses in the northern region. In Professional Issues scales, only the scale perception of burden related with upsetting behaviors revealed significant differences between regions in all specialties. Conclusion: the findings suggest the need for increased investment by hospital leaders to promote a geriatric nursing practice environment that supports the specialized needs of hospitalized older adults.
Resumo Objetivo: analisar a relação entre as percepções dos enfermeiros sobre o ambiente de cuidado geriátrico (CG) e os conhecimentos e atitudes destes de acordo com o tipo de unidade, considerando as regiões Norte e Central de Portugal. Método: estudo transversal, desenvolvido com 1068 enfermeiros portugueses em cinco hospitais. O instrumento foi o Geriatric Institutional Assessment Profile - versão em Português. Foi utilizado o teste t para amostras independentes quando a suposição de normalidade foi verificada; caso contrário, utilizou-se o teste de Mann-Whitney. O nível de significância foi de 5%. Resultados: o perfil de percepções de cuidado geriátrico mostrou um padrão relativamente homogêneo (não foram encontrados resultados estatisticamente significantes). Para a escala de ambiente de cuidado geriátrico, apenas as unidades de cuidados intensivos e serviço de urgência apresentaram diferenças significativas em todas as subescalas consideradas (disponibilidade de recursos, cuidado sensível à idade, valores institucionais; e continuidade do cuidado), com percepções mais positivas entre os enfermeiros da região Norte. Nas escalas de Questões Profissionais, somente a escala percepção da sobrecarga relacionada aos comportamentos perturbadores revelou diferenças significativas entre as regiões em todas as especialidades. Conclusão: os resultados sugerem a necessidade de maior investimento pelos gerentes hospitalares para promover um ambiente de prática de enfermagem geriátrica e que vá ao encontro das necessidades e especificidades das pessoas idosas hospitalizadas.
Resume Objetivo: analizar la relación entre la percepción de los enfermeros sobre el entorno de la atención geriátrica y el su conocimiento y actitudes según el tipo de unidad tomando en cuenta las regiones del Norte y Centro de Portugal. Método: estudio transversal desarrollado con 1068 enfermeros portugueses en cinco hospitales. El instrumento fue Geriatric Institutional Assessment Profile - versión en portugués. Se utilizo la prueba t para muestra independientes cuando fue verificada la supuesta normalidad; de lo contrario, se utilizó la prueba de Mann-Whitney. El nivel de significancia fue del 5 %. Resultados: el perfil de las percepciones de atención geriátrica mostró un patrón relativamente homogénea (no se encontraron resultados estadísticamente significativos). Para la escala de entorno atención geriátrica, solo las unidades de cuidados intensivos y servicios de urgencias presentaron diferencias significativas en todas las subescalas estudiadas (disponibilidad de recursos; cuidado sensible a edad; valores institucionales y continuidad del cuidado), con una percepción más positiva entre los enfermeros en la región Norte. En las escalas de las cuestiones de carácter profesional, solo la escala percepción de la sobrecarga relacionada con comportamientos desconcertantes reveló diferencias significativas entre las regiones en todas las especialidades. Conclusión: los hallazgos sugieren la necesidad de una mayor inversión por parte de los gerentes del los hospitales para promover un entorno de la práctica de enfermería geriátrica que sea compatible con las necesidades específicas de los adultos mayores hospitalizados.