RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Racially minoritized youth with T1D are made vulnerable to disproportionately adverse health outcomes compared to White peers due to enduring systems of oppression. Thus, understanding modifiable psychosocial factors associated with diabetes-related outcomes in racially minoritized youth may help to buffer deleterious effects of racism. One factor meriting exploration is racial-ethnic identity. There is currently limited research on measures fit to assess ethnic identity in youth with chronic illnesses. This study's purpose is to examine the factor structure, reliability, and validity of the revised Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure (MEIM-R) in a racially- and income-diverse sample of youth with T1D across sociodemographic and illness-related proxies for one's positionality in oppressive systems. METHOD: As part of a larger study examining resilience, 142 youth with T1D ages 12-18 (Mage = 14.66, SDage = 1.62, 55.6% Black/African-American, 44.4% White) completed the MEIM-R and various psychosocial measures. HbA1c levels and illness duration were extracted from medical records and caregivers reported income information. Confirmatory factor analyses compared the structural validity of competing MEIM-R models, and uniform and non-uniform differential item functioning (DIF) was explored across sociodemographic and illness-related factors. RESULTS: While a bifactor structure was supported, the MEIM-R was found to exhibit DIF by race and gender on multiple MEIM-R items and did not demonstrate linear bivariate relations with other psychosocial factors. CONCLUSIONS: Since different MEIM-R item response patterns were observed across racial/ethnic and gender groups, caution is warranted in using this measure in racially and gender diverse youth with T1D.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop a short form of the Diabetes Stress Questionnaire (DSQ) with adequate psychometric properties (i.e., internal consistency, convergent, criterion, discriminant validity, construct validity, and measurement invariance). METHODS: In total, 181 youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D) completed the 65-item DSQ, and archival data were obtained from 142 youth with T1D to serve as an independent cross-validation sample. Twenty-four items were chosen to retain the original eight scales of the DSQ and to maximize internal consistency and correlations to full subscales. Confirmatory factor analyses were used to evaluate the proposed factor structure of the Diabetes Stress Questionnaire-Short Form (DSQ-SF) and to assess invariance of the DSQ-SF across sex, race, grade level, glycemic control, illness duration, and annual income categories. RESULTS: The 24-item DSQ-SF was found to have good internal consistency, factor structure and fit, correlated highly to the full scale (r = .98), and was invariant across sex, race, grade level (<9th grade or >9th grade), glycemic control, illness duration, and annual income. CONCLUSIONS: The DSQ-SF appears to be a psychometrically robust measure of diabetes-specific stress in youth with T1D. Present findings suggest that the DSQ-SF has the potential to be a useful, quick, cost-effective, and comprehensive screening tool for identifying youth with T1D who may benefit from T1D-specific stress reduction interventions as a way to improve health behaviors, psychosocial well-being, and glycemic control.