RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cervical spine (c-spine) and shoulder pathology have been known to cause similar symptoms and often co-exist, making an accurate diagnosis difficult, especially in an elderly population. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) has been shown to decrease pain and improve quality of life when shoulder pathology is the source of pain and disability. The purpose of this study was to identify the prevalence of c-spine pathology in a cohort of patients who underwent rTSA and to compare postoperative outcome scores to a cohort without c-spine pathology. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed utilizing a single institution's operative records of primary rTSAs. Radiology reports, imaging, and operative reports were reviewed, and presence of any c-spine pathology or previous surgery were recorded. Additionally, postoperative outcome scores (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES], Constant Score, University of California, Los Angeles [UCLA], and Simple Shoulder Test [SST]) were evaluated at >2 years post-rTSA. RESULTS: A total of 438 primary rTSA cases were evaluated. Of these, 143 (32.6%) had documentation of prior c-spine pathology and/or history of previous c-spine surgery. After applying further exclusion criteria, a total of 50 patients with c-spine pathology and 108 patients without c-spine pathology were found to have complete medical records and postoperative outcome scores to allow comparison between groups. Patients without c-spine pathology were found to have statistically higher postoperative UCLA, ASES, and SST scores when compared to patients with c-spine pathology. Patients without c-spine pathology also demonstrated a significant improvement in the difference between their postoperative and preoperative UCLA and ASES scores. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated a high prevalence of c-spine pathology (32.6%) in a cohort of patients who underwent primary rTSA. Additionally, short-term outcome scores of patients undergoing rTSA with concomitant c-spine pathology are significantly lower than those of patients without a history of c-spine pathology.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Introduction: Odontoid fractures are one of the most common injuries to the cervical spine. Type II odontoid fracture treatment varies depending on age, co-morbidities, and fracture morphology. Treatment ranges from cervical orthosis to surgical intervention. CurrentlyAt present, fractures with high non-union rates are considered for operative management which includes displacement of >6 mm, increasing age (>40--60 years), fracture gap >1 mm, delay in treatment >4 days, posterior re-displacement >2 mm, increased angulation, and history of smoking. While re-displacement of >2 mm has been associated with increased risk of non-union;, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have looked at the risk factors for re-displacement. Case Report: We present two 26-year-old male patients who were found to have minimally displaced type II odontoid fractures initially treated in a cervical collar. These two patients were subsequently found to have displaced their odontoid fracture after having a documented seizure. Conclusion: We suggest that a history of seizures be considered a risk factor for re-displacement of non-displaced type II odontoid fractures.

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Narrative review. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this narrative review is to examine trends in malpractice litigation arising from spine surgery. We also hope to detail mitigation strategies that surgeons can employ to decrease their risk of a claim. METHODS: A review of the relevant literature examining the prevalence, risks, and outcomes of malpractice litigation following spine surgery was conducted using the MEDLINE and Embase databases. RESULTS: Combined queries identified 1140 potentially relevant articles. After eliminating duplicate articles and screening by title and abstract, 38 articles underwent full-text review. Of these, 22 were deemed relevant to the research questions posed. Evaluation of references identified 1 additional relevant article. Spine surgery represents one of the most litigious specialties in the United States health care system. The available literature points to a consistent pattern of common allegations leading to litigation following spine surgery. While a majority of filed lawsuits end in the surgeon's favor, these cases carry high monetary and time expenditures regardless of outcome. Furthermore, the threat of a malpractice lawsuit motivates many surgeons to practice defensive medicine by utilizing unnecessary or unindicated tests and studies. CONCLUSION: Through the examination of trends in malpractice claims and case outcomes, surgeons may be able to adapt practices to minimize their risk of litigation. These changes can include, but are not limited to, identification of those procedures that are most litigious and a more thorough discussion of the informed consent process to include operative and nonoperative treatments prior to all procedures. More important, however, spine surgeons can potentially serve as advocates for change.

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Literature review. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this literature review is to examine the effects of psychological disorders on postoperative complications, surgical outcomes, and long-term narcotic use. We also hope to detail the value of preoperative identification and treatment of these pathologies. METHODS: A series of systematic reviews of the relevant literature examining the effects of psychological disorders and spine surgery was conducted using PubMed and Cochrane databases. RESULTS: Combined, the database queries yielded 2275 articles for consideration. After applying screening criteria, 96 articles were selected for inclusion. Patients with underlying psychological disease have higher rates of delirium, readmission, longer hospital stays, and higher rates of nonroutine discharge following spine surgery. They also have higher rates of chronic postoperative narcotic use and may experience worse surgical outcomes. Because of these defined issues, researchers have developed multiple screening tools to help identify patients with psychological disorders preoperatively for potential treatment. Treatment of these disorders prior to surgery may significantly improve surgical outcomes. CONCLUSION: Patients with psychological disorders represent a unique population with respect to their higher rates of spinal pain complaints, postoperative complications, and worsened functional outcomes. However, proper identification and treatment of these conditions prior to surgery may significantly improve many outcome measures in this population. Future investigations in this field should attempt to develop and validate current strategies to identify and treat individuals with psychological disorders before surgery to further improve outcomes.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pseudomeningocele is an uncommon but widely recognized complication of spinal surgery that can be challenging to correct. When conservative measures fail, patients frequently require reoperation to attempt primary closure of the durotomy, yet attempts at true watertight closures of the dura or fascia sometimes fall short. We describe a technique of lumbosacral pseudomeningocele repair involving a 2-layer pants-over-vest closure of the pseudomeningocele coupled with mobilization of bilateral paraspinal musculature to create a Z-plasty, or a Z-shaped flap. We have demonstrated a high success rate with our small series. METHODS: The technique used meticulous manipulation of the pseudomeningocele to make a 2-layer pants-over-vest closure. This closure coupled with wide mobilization and importation of paraspinous muscle into the wound effectively obliterated dead space with simultaneous tamponade of the dural tear. The lateral row perforators were left intact, providing excellent vascularity with adequate mobility to the patient. RESULTS: This technique was incorporated into the care of 10 patients between 2004 and July 2019. All wounds were closed in a single stage after careful flap section based on the wound's needs. We demonstrated successful pseudomeningocele resolution in all 10 patients with no observed clinical recurrence of symptomatic pseudomeningocele after at least 6 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This technique provides a straightforward option for the spine surgeon to manage these challenging spinal wounds with minimal, if any, need for further laminectomy as well as a high fistula control rate with minimal morbidity.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

By April 7, 2020, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 was responsible for 1,383,436 confirmed cases of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), involving 209 countries around the world; 378,881 cases have been confirmed in the United States. During this pandemic, the urgent surgical requirements will not stop. As an example, the most recent Centers of Disease Control and Prevention reports estimate that there are 2.8 million trauma patients hospitalized in the United States. These data illustrate an increase in the likelihood of encountering urgent surgical patients with either clinically suspected or confirmed COVID-19 in the near future. Preparation for a pandemic involves considering the different levels in the hierarchy of controls and the different phases of the pandemic. Apart from the fact that this pandemic certainly involves many important health, economic, and community ramifications, it also requires several initiatives to mandate what measures are most appropriate to prepare for mitigating the occupational risks. This article provides evidence-based recommendations and measures for the appropriate personal protective equipment for different clinical and surgical activities in various settings. To reduce the occupational risk in treating suspected or confirmed COVID-19 urgent orthopaedic patients, recommended precautions and preventive actions (triage area, emergency department consultation room, induction room, operating room, and recovery room) are reviewed.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Acromioclavicular separations are common injuries. Low-grade separations are typically managed with nonoperative treatment. However, surgical treatment is recommended for high-grade separations, as well as for chronic low-grade separations that remain symptomatic. Multiple fixation techniques have been described over the past several decades, including Kirschner wires, hook plates, and coracoclavicular screws. More recently, a single-tunnel suture-graft repair and an anatomic reconstruction reproducing both the conoid and trapezoid ligaments have been described. All described techniques have reported complications, including implant migration, need for implant removal, clavicle or coracoid fracture, and loss of reduction. As a result, there is no single optimal method of operative fixation. We describe our technique for an arthroscopically assisted anatomic coracoclavicular repair using a 6-strand suture tape and cortical button construct.